Skip to main content

The Future of Energy

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
ITER: The Giant Fusion Reactor

Abstract

The demand for energy continues to grow in virtually every country in the world, a “natural” consequence of demographic changes, boosted by the almost universal increase in quality of life and by the development of emerging economies. The world’s energy consumption has more than doubled since 1973; it could even be tripled by the end of the century. Although the planet’s main fossil fuels—oil, natural gas, and coal—are being depleted, they still provide about 80% of the energy consumed. The pressing reality of climate change calls for a radical and urgent change in our relationship to energy. At the same time we must develop new solutions that are as safe and environmentally friendly as possible, based on sustainable and universally available sources. Fusion energy, which reproduces physical reactions occurring in the Sun and the stars, meets these requirements. Most of the world’s scientific community is convinced that scientific and technological mastery of this energy is within reach. However, will we need fusion energy at all? Several experts argue that an energy supply based solely on renewable sources is possible by 2050. Nevertheless, despite growing investments and encouraging evolutions many experts do not envisage green energies completely supplanting all “unsustainable” sources before the end of this century. They point to physical space constraints and natural fluctuations of solar and wind energies as factors limiting the contribution that clean energies will make to global energy production. In the future energy will probably be supplied through a diverse “mix” of energy sources. Will humanity need controlled fusion to secure its energy future? Maybe, maybe not. Some Nobel laureates, like the French physicist Georges Charpak , have strongly criticized ITER. But high-level government officials have very different ideas. “We would be crazy not to achieve ITER”, said Geneviève Fioraso, then French Minister of Research and National Education, when she inaugurated the headquarters of ITER in 2013. We will address these contradictory statements and apparently irreconcilable positions in the following chapters.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 19.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Not just because oil is depleted but also because of climate change. Moreover, oil is too precious to be used to move cars; it should only be available for pharmaceutical and industrial exploitation.

  2. 2.

    Tonnes of oil equivalent (toe) is a unit of energy defined by convention as the amount of energy released by burning 1 tonne of crude oil and is equivalent to approximately 42 giga/billion joules.

  3. 3.

    Rifkin [1].

  4. 4.

    See also the work carried out in Europe, in particular by ADEME and Association négaWatt, who argue for the feasibility of total conversion to renewable energies by 2050 since in addition to its advantages it would lead to savings of hundreds of billions of euros and the creation of some 500,000 jobs in France, https://www.negawatt.org/.

  5. 5.

    European Commission [2].

  6. 6.

    Kampman et al. [3].

  7. 7.

    McCrone [4].

  8. 8.

    The Conferences of the Parties (COP) is the supreme decision-making body of the UN Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC). All States that are Parties to the Convention are represented at the COP, which annually reviews its implementation and produces protocols and any other legal instruments to define obligations and commitments of the Parties.

  9. 9.

    To date (May 2019) 185 of the 197 Parties to the Convention have ratified the Paris Agreement accounting for around 89% of global emissions, https://unfccc.int/process/the-paris-agreement/status-of-ratification.

  10. 10.

    Hulot [5].

  11. 11.

    The report from the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change shows that it is still technically feasible to avoid a 1.5 °C rise in global temperature. For this to happen emissions will need to reach net-zero around mid-century. USD13.5 trillion is estimated to be necessary to make the energy transition. The report also shows that 2 °C is a critical threshold for the planet. See IPCC (2018) Global warming of 1.5 °C. Switzerland, IPCC, http://www.ipcc.ch/report/sr15/.

  12. 12.

    Report from the Commission to the European Parliament and the Council [6].

  13. 13.

    Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament and Council [7].

  14. 14.

    IEA [8].

  15. 15.

    Martin [9].

  16. 16.

    Created in 1996 the association now has several million members and associates, http://ecolo.org/intro/introfr.htm.

  17. 17.

    “The concept of the need for baseload generation is fading away”, said Paolo Frankl, who heads the renewable power division of the IEA. “Technically, you could run a system 100% on renewables and even 100% just wind and solar”. Bloomberg News, October 20, 2017, https://www.bloomberg.com/news/features/2017-10-20/renewable-energy-threatens-the-world-s-biggest-science-project.

References

  1. Rifkin J (2013) The third industrial revolution: how lateral power is transforming energy, the economy, and the world. Palgrave Macmillan, New York

    Google Scholar 

  2. European Commission (2016) Press release database. http://europa.eu/rapid/press-release_IP-16-4009_en.htm

  3. Kampman B, Blommerde J, Afman M (2016) The potential for energy citizens in the European Union. Committed to the Environment, Delft,http://www.cedelft.eu/publicatie/the_potential_of_energy_citizens_in_the_european_union/1845

  4. McCrone A (2018) Global trends in renewable energy investment 2018, Frankfurt School-UNEP Centre/BNEF, Frankfurt am Main. http://www.iberglobal.com/files/2018/renewable_trends.pdf

  5. Hulot N (2015) Osons—Plaidoyer d’un homme libre. Les liens qui libèrent, Paris

    Google Scholar 

  6. Report from the Commission to the European Parliament and the Council (2017) Two years after Paris—Progress towards meeting the EU’s climate commitments. European Commission, Brussels, https://ec.europa.eu/clima/sites/clima/files/strategies/progress/docs/swd_2017_xxx_en.pdf

  7. Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament and Council (2014) Energy efficiency and its contribution to energy security and the 2030 Framework for climate and energy policy. COM(2014), 520 final. European Commission, Brussels. http://eur-lex.europa.eu/resource.html?uri=cellar:f0db7509-13e5-11e4-933d-01aa75ed71a1.0003.03/DOC_1&format=PDF

  8. IEA (2018) Energy outlook 2018, IEA, Paris. https://www.iea.org/weo2018/

  9. Martin S (2018) Fusion has the power to avert climate change chaos. In: The financial times. https://www.ft.com/content/a5e4a352-d77c-11e8-a854-33d6f82e62f8

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Michel Claessens .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Claessens, M. (2020). The Future of Energy. In: ITER: The Giant Fusion Reactor. Copernicus, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-27581-5_1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-27581-5_1

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Copernicus, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-27580-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-27581-5

  • eBook Packages: EnergyEnergy (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics