Skip to main content

Well-being: A Reflective Equilibrium

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
A Universal Declaration of Human Well-being

Part of the book series: Wellbeing in Politics and Policy ((WPP))

  • 265 Accesses

Abstract

The question of what it means to live well has been debated in the public forum for millennia, and continues to occupy a central place in politics and policy. The starting hypothesis of this study was that, if people across the world, from different cultures, languages and worldviews, share common values, and if these overlap with philosophical theories of well-being, then this is evidence that there are good reasons and reason to value those things. This chapter brings together the different strands of analysis to identify common ground between theoretical and practical accounts of well-being. The final analysis shows that good social relationships are a necessary condition of all the other constituents of a good life. Happiness and freedom require other people, and good health, work, education and leisure are grounded in meaningful, mutually respectful social connections. Belonging—the sharing of identities, interests and ends with others—grounds well-being. For politics and policy, focusing on Sociality would reap dividends: Good social relationships are a catalyst of overall well-being. The biggest lesson for politics and policy is that the journey Beyond GDP should be directed towards building a sound infrastructure of sociality to underpin well-being.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 59.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Aristotle. (1976). The Ethics of Aristotle: The Nicomachean Ethics (J. A. K. Thomson, Trans.). London: Penguin Classics.

    Google Scholar 

  • Finnis, J. (2011). Natural law and natural rights. Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lindemann, H. (2016). Holding and Letting Go: The Social Practice of Personal Identities. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nussbaum, M. C. (2000). Women and Human Development: The Capabilities Approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rawls, J. (1972). A Theory of Justice. London: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rawls, J. (2001). Justice as Fairness: A Restatement. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sen, A. (1999). Development as Freedom. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, P. S. (2006). The effects of solitary confinement on prison inmates: A brief history and review of the literature. Crime and Justice, 34(1), 441–528.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Takayama, N., Korpela, K., Lee, J., Morikawa, T., Tsunetsugu, Y., Park, B. J., et al. (2014). Emotional, restorative and vitalizing effects of forest and urban environments at four sites in Japan. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 11(7), 7207–7230.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wolff, J., & de-Shalit, A. (2007). Disadvantage. Oxford: Oxford University Press on Demand.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Annie Austin .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Austin, A. (2020). Well-being: A Reflective Equilibrium. In: A Universal Declaration of Human Well-being. Wellbeing in Politics and Policy. Palgrave Pivot, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-27107-7_9

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics