Abstract
The question of what it means to live well has been debated in the public forum for millennia, and continues to occupy a central place in politics and policy. The starting hypothesis of this study was that, if people across the world, from different cultures, languages and worldviews, share common values, and if these overlap with philosophical theories of well-being, then this is evidence that there are good reasons and reason to value those things. This chapter brings together the different strands of analysis to identify common ground between theoretical and practical accounts of well-being. The final analysis shows that good social relationships are a necessary condition of all the other constituents of a good life. Happiness and freedom require other people, and good health, work, education and leisure are grounded in meaningful, mutually respectful social connections. Belonging—the sharing of identities, interests and ends with others—grounds well-being. For politics and policy, focusing on Sociality would reap dividends: Good social relationships are a catalyst of overall well-being. The biggest lesson for politics and policy is that the journey Beyond GDP should be directed towards building a sound infrastructure of sociality to underpin well-being.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Aristotle. (1976). The Ethics of Aristotle: The Nicomachean Ethics (J. A. K. Thomson, Trans.). London: Penguin Classics.
Finnis, J. (2011). Natural law and natural rights. Oxford University Press.
Lindemann, H. (2016). Holding and Letting Go: The Social Practice of Personal Identities. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Nussbaum, M. C. (2000). Women and Human Development: The Capabilities Approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Rawls, J. (1972). A Theory of Justice. London: Oxford University Press.
Rawls, J. (2001). Justice as Fairness: A Restatement. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Sen, A. (1999). Development as Freedom. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Smith, P. S. (2006). The effects of solitary confinement on prison inmates: A brief history and review of the literature. Crime and Justice, 34(1), 441–528.
Takayama, N., Korpela, K., Lee, J., Morikawa, T., Tsunetsugu, Y., Park, B. J., et al. (2014). Emotional, restorative and vitalizing effects of forest and urban environments at four sites in Japan. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 11(7), 7207–7230.
Wolff, J., & de-Shalit, A. (2007). Disadvantage. Oxford: Oxford University Press on Demand.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2020 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Austin, A. (2020). Well-being: A Reflective Equilibrium. In: A Universal Declaration of Human Well-being. Wellbeing in Politics and Policy. Palgrave Pivot, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-27107-7_9
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-27107-7_9
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Pivot, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-27106-0
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-27107-7
eBook Packages: Political Science and International StudiesPolitical Science and International Studies (R0)