Abstract
The question of what it means to live a good life is an ancient one. During the same historical era as the ancient Greeks were working on Socrates’ question of what makes a good life, thinkers in other parts of the world were also asking the same thing; for example, Confucius in China, and the Vedic philosophers in India. The Socratic question has continued to occupy the minds of thinkers throughout the ages, and has become an increasingly important part of modern politics and policy. This chapter shows the areas of overlap among accounts of well-being across the ages. First, the parallels between ancient Greek, Confucian, and Hindu ethical frameworks of the good life are discussed. Next, a selection of modern political philosophies of the good are mined for candidate universals. The chapter shows that thinkers across time, geography, tradition and culture have found reason to value certain aspects of human life. These aspects are Social relationships, Work, Leisure, Education, Health (physical and psychological), Aesthetic experience, and Integrity (also known as “Authentic self-direction”). These more detailed accounts add content to the three basic values identified in Chapter 2: Happiness (from Hedonism); Freedom (from Liberalism); and Sociality (from Aristotelianism).
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Chakraborty, D. (2006). Is an Indian ethics of virtue possible? Journal of Human Values, 12(1), 91–98.
Chappell, T. (Ed.). (2006). Values and Virtues: Aristotelianism in Contemporary Ethics. Oxford: Oxford University Press on Demand.
Cleary, T. (1992). Introduction. In T. Cleary (Trans.), The Essential Confucius (pp. 1–11). New York: HarperCollins.
Dworkin, R. (1993). Life’s Dominion: An Argument About Abortion, Euthanasia, and Individual Freedom. London: HarperCollins.
Goldie, P. (2007). Dramatic irony, narrative, and the external perspective. Royal Institute of Philosophy Supplements, 60, 69–84.
Gomez-Lobo, A. (2002). Morality and the Human Goods: An Introduction to Natural Law Ethics. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.
Hacker, P. (2006). Dharma in Hinduism. Journal of Indian Philosophy, 34(5), 479–496.
Huang, C. (Ed.). (1997). The analects of Confucius. Oxford University Press on Demand.
Nussbaum, M. C. (2000). Women and Human Development: The Capabilities Approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Parekh, B. C. (1989). Gandhi’s Political Philosophy: A Critical Examination. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
Sharma, D. S. (2014). Hindu values. Asian Values: Encounter with Diversity, 106.
Tan, S. H. (2003). Confucian Democracy: A Deweyan Reconstruction. Albany: SUNY Press.
Yao, H. C., & Yao, X. (2000). An introduction to Confucianism. Cambridge University Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2020 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Austin, A. (2020). The Conditions and Constituents of Well-being: Overlapping Values. In: A Universal Declaration of Human Well-being. Wellbeing in Politics and Policy. Palgrave Pivot, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-27107-7_3
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-27107-7_3
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Pivot, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-27106-0
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-27107-7
eBook Packages: Political Science and International StudiesPolitical Science and International Studies (R0)