Skip to main content

Conclusions and Implications

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Audience Engagement in the Performing Arts

Part of the book series: New Directions in Cultural Policy Research ((NDCPR))

  • 1667 Accesses

Abstract

This chapter draws out the key findings and conclusions from the book and explores their implications for the evolving field of audience studies, and, most significantly, for the future of audience research in the performing arts. It hones in on the phenomenon of engagement and outlines how this core concept might be fruitfully reconceptualised to move the field and the performing arts sector forwards. The chapter considers the implications of the book’s findings for external stakeholders, including arts and cultural organisations, artists and arts professionals, and policymakers. It makes the case for audience-centric organisations fuelled by mutually beneficial relationships of artistic exchange. Finally, the chapter offers some overall conclusions and speculates about the likely direction of future research in the field.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Arvidsson, A. 2008. The ethical economy of customer coproduction. Journal of Macromarketing, 28(4), pp. 326–338.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Auslander, P. 2008. Liveness: Performance in a mediatized culture. 2nd ed. Oxon, Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barker, M. 2006. I have seen the future and it is not here yet …; or, on being ambitious for audience research. The Communication Review, 9(2), pp. 123–141.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ben Chaim, D. 1984. Distance in the theatre: The aesthetics of audience response. London; Ann Arbor, UMI Research Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bitgood, S. 2010. An attention-value model of museum visitors. Available from: https://airandspace.si.edu/rfp/exhibitions/files/j1-exhibition-guidelines/3/An%20Attention-Value%20Model%20of%20Museum%20Visitors.pdf [Accessed 5 April 2019].

  • Boorsma, M. 2006. A strategic logic for arts marketing: Integrating customer value and artistic objectives. The International Journal of Cultural Policy, 12(1), pp. 73–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, A. S., Novak-Leonard, J. L. and Gilbride, S. 2011. Getting in on the act: How arts groups are creating opportunities for active participation. San Francisco, CA, The James Irvine Foundation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burland, K. and Pitts, S. 2012. Rules and expectations of jazz gigs. Social Semiotics, 22(5), pp. 523–543.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Conner, L. 2013. Audience engagement and the role of arts talk in the digital era. New York, Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Department for Culture Media and Sport. 2007. Culture on demand: Ways to engage a broader audience. London, Department for Culture Media and Sport.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heim, C. 2016. Audience as performer: The changing role of theatre audiences in the Twenty-First Century. London and New York, Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Machon, J. 2013. Immersive theatres: Intimacy and immediacy in contemporary performance. London, Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • McMaster, B. 2008. Supporting excellence in the arts: From measurement to judgement. London, Department for Culture Media and Sport.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Toole, J., Adams, R.-J., Anderson, M., Burton, B. and Ewing, R. (eds.). 2014. Young audiences, theatre and the cultural conversation. Dordrecht, Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Payne, A. F. and Frow, P. 2005. A strategic framework for customer relationship management. Journal of Marketing, 69, pp. 167–176.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Prahalad, C. K. and Ramaswamy, V. 2004. Co-creation experiences: The next practice in value creation. Journal of Interactive Marketing, 18(3), pp. 5–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rentschler, R. 2007. Museum marketing: Understanding different types of audiences. In: Sandell, R. and Janes, R. R. (eds.) Museum management and marketing. London; New York, Routledge, pp. 345–365.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sauter, W. 2000. The theatrical event: Dynamics of performance and perception. Iowa city, University of Iowa Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Silvia, P. J. 2005. Emotional responses to art: From collation and arousal to cognition and emotion. Review of General Psychology, 9(4), pp. 342–357.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simon, N. 2010. The participatory museum. Santa Cruz, Museum 2.0.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walmsley, B. 2019. The death of arts marketing: A paradigm shift from consumption to enrichment. Arts and the Market, 9(1), pp. 32–49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Whalley, J. and Miller, L. 2017. Between us: Audiences, affect and the in-between. London, Palgrave.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ben Walmsley .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Walmsley, B. (2019). Conclusions and Implications. In: Audience Engagement in the Performing Arts. New Directions in Cultural Policy Research. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-26653-0_9

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics