Abstract
Since the 1970s, people in the U.S. have been more likely than in the past to experience union separation and re-partnering, and children have been more likely to experience more than one kind of family arrangement throughout their childhood (Bzostek et al. 2012; Cherlin 2009, 2010). Previous research has paid important attention to the outcomes of children growing up in step-families and the determinants of union formation of parents. Significant research has focused on the experiences of single mothers. However, less attention has been given to the role of marriage markets on the formation of unions among single parents, and the differences in the impact of marriage markets for men and women with children. The main goal of the research I present in this chapter is to provide a better understanding of the context of union formation after childbearing, with special focus on its determinants and the influence of local marriage markets. I particularly focus on how these effects differ for men and women.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
- 1.
The NSFH includes a category for “other race,” but only 52 cases in the sample were in this category. Given the small sample size, and the difficulty to reach statistically significant and substantively meaningful conclusions from an “other” category, I decided to exclude these records from the analysis.
- 2.
References
Argys, L. M., et al. (2007). Measuring contact between children and nonresident fathers. In S. L. Hofferth & L. M. Casper (Eds.), Handbook of measurement issues in family research (pp. 375–398). Mahwah: Erlbaum.
Buckle, L., Gallup, G. G., & Rodd, Z. A. (1996). Marriage as a reproductive contract: Patterns of marriage, divorce, and remarriage. Ethology and Sociobiology, 377, 363–377.
Bumpass, L. L., Raley, R. K., & Sweet, J. A. (1995). The changing character of stepfamilies: Implications of cohabitation and nonmarital childbearing. Demography, 32(3), 425–436.
Bzostek, S. H., McLanahan, S. S., & Carlson, M. J. (2012). Mothers’ repartnering after a nonmarital birth. Social Forces, 90(3), 817–841.
Çelikaksoy, A., Nekby, L., & Rashid, S. (2010). Assortative mating by ethnic background and education among individuals with an immigrant background in Sweden. Zeitschrift für Familienforschung-Journal of Family Research, 22(Jahrg), 65–88.
Cherlin, A. J. (2004). The deinstitutionalization of American marriage. Journal of Marriage and Family, 66(4), 848–861.
Cherlin, A. J. (2009). The marriage-go-round. New York: Knopf.
Cherlin, A. (2010). Demographic trends in the United States: A review of research in the 2000s. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 72(3), 403–419.
Cooksey, E. C., & Fondell, M. M. (1996). Spending time with his kids: Effects of family structure on fathers’ and children’s lives. Journal of Marriage and Family, 58(August), 693–707.
Donato, K. M. (1999). A dynamic view of Mexican migration to the United States. Gender Issues, 17(1), 52–75.
Donato, K. M. (2010). U.S. migration from Latin America: Gendered patterns and shifts. The Annals of the American Acadamy of Political and Social Science, 630(1), 78–92.
Edin, K., & Kefalas, M. (2005). Promises I can keep: why poor women put motherhood before marriage. University of California Press.
Goldscheider, F. K., & Kaufman, G. (2006). Willingness to stepparent: Attitudes about partners who already have children. Journal of Family Issues, 27, 1415–1436.
Goldscheider, F., & Sassler, S. (2006). Creating stepfamilies: Integrating children into the study of union formation. Journal of Marriage and Family, 68(May), 275–291.
Goldscheider, F., Kaufman, G., & Sassler, S. (2009). Navigating the ‘new’ marriage market: How attitudes toward partner characteristics shape union formation. Journal of Family Issues, 30(6), 719–737.
Guzzo, K. B. (2006). How do marriage market conditions affect entrance into cohabitation vs. marriage? Social Science Research, 35(2), 332–355.
Guzzo, K. B. (2016). Marriage and disolution among women’s cohabitations: Variations by stepfamily status and shared childbearing. Bowling Green.
Harknett, K. (2008). Mate availability and unmarried parents. Demograhy, 45(3), 555–571.
Hofferth, S. L. (2006). Residential father family type and child well-being: Investment versus selection. Demography, 43(1), 53–77.
Hofferth, S. L., & Anderson, K. G. (2003). Are all dads equal? Biology versus marriage as a basis for parental investment. Journal of Marriage and Family, 65(February), 213–232.
Kalmijn, M. (1998). Intermarriage and homogamy: Causes, patterns, trends. Annual Review of Sociology, 24(24), 395–421.
Lewis, S. K., & Oppenheimer, V. K. (2000). Educational assortative mating across marriage markets: Non-hispanic whites in the United States. Demography, 37(1), 29–40.
Lichter, D. T., & Graefe, D. R. (2007). Men and marriage promotion: Who marries unwed mothers? Social Service Review, 81(3), 397–421.
Lichter, D. T., McLaughlin, D. K., Kephart, G., & Landry, D. J. (1992). Race and the retreat from marriage: A shortage of marriageable men? American Sociological Review, 57(6), 781–799.
Lichter, D. T., Anderson, R. N., & Hayward, M. D. (1995). Marriage markets and marital choice. Journal of Family Issues, 16(4), 412–431.
Lichter, D. T., Qian, Z., & Mellott, L. M. (2006). Marriage or dissolution? Union transitions among poor cohabiting women. Demography, 43(2), 223–240.
Lloyd, K. M., & South, S. J. (1996). Contextual influences on young men’s transition to first marriage. Social Forces, 74(3), 1097–1119.
Oppenheimer, V. K. (1988). A theory of marriage timing. American Journal of Sociology, 94(3), 563–591.
Oropesa, R. S., Lichter, D. T., & Anderson, R. N. (1994). Marriage markets and the paradox of Mexican American Nuptiality. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 56(4), 889–907.
Parrado, E. A., & Zenteno, R. M. (2002). Gender differences in union formation in Mexico: Evidence from marital search models. Journal of Marriage and Family, 64(August), 756–773.
Stewart, S. D. (2003). Union formation among men in the US: Does having prior children matter? Journal of Marriage and Family, 65(1), 90–104.
Sweeney, M. M. (2010). Remarriage and stepfamilies: Strategic sites for family scholarship in the 21st century. Journal of Marriage and Family, 72(June), 667–684.
Sweet, J. A., & Bumpass, L. L. (1996). The national survey of families and households – waves 1 and 2: Data description and documentation (pp. 1–598).
Sweet, J. A., Bumpass, L. L, & Call, V. (1988). The design and content of the national survey of families and households. Center for Demography and Ecology, University of Wisconsin-Madison.
Waite, L. J. (2005). Marriage and Family. In D. L. Poston & M. Micklin (Eds.), Handbook of population. New York: Springer US.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Appendix
Appendix
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Sánchez-Soto, G. (2020). Union Formation Selectivity After Childbearing: Do Local Marriage Markets Matter?. In: Singelmann, J., Poston, Jr, D. (eds) Developments in Demography in the 21st Century. The Springer Series on Demographic Methods and Population Analysis, vol 48. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-26492-5_15
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-26492-5_15
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-26491-8
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-26492-5
eBook Packages: Mathematics and StatisticsMathematics and Statistics (R0)