Abstract
The chapter traces the use of allusions to common experience from their beginnings in the case study group. They show that it is often moments where the learners’ shortcomings in linguistic competence are revealed which provide the inspiration for play. Thus, failure, with its potential for face-threat and humiliation, can be transformed into something celebratory and act as an affirming social glue within the group. A number of threads are explored from the moment they were first seeded and are shown to develop and flower through repeated reference to them. Thus, significant cultural reference points are woven into the fabric of communication within the group. These references can, through repetition, become ritualised and mythologised and thus form part of the group’s developing culture.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Armstrong, K. (2005). A short history of myth. Edinburgh: Canongate.
Aston, G. (1993). Notes on the interlanguage of comity. In G. Kasper & S. Blum-Kulka (Eds.), Interlanguage pragmatics (pp. 224–250). New York: Oxford University Press.
Bakhtin, M. M. (1984a). Problems of Dostoevsky’s poetics. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
Bakhtin, M. M. (1984b). Rabelais and his world. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
Baynham, M. (1996). Humour as an interpersonal resource in adult numeracy classes. Language and Education, 10(2–3), 187–200. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500789608666708.
Boxer, D., & Cortés-Conde, F. (1997). From bonding to biting: Conversational joking and identity display. Journal of Pragmatics, 27, 275–294. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-2166(96)00031-8.
Broner, M., & Tarone, E. (2001). Is it fun? Language play in a fifth-grade Spanish immersion classroom. Canadian Modern Language Review, 58(4), 493–525. https://doi.org/10.3138/cmlr.58.4.493.
Brown, P., & Levinson, S. (1987). Politeness. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Carter, R. (2004). Language and creativity: The art of common talk. Abingdon: Routledge.
Cekaite, A., & Aronsson, K. (2005). Language play, a collaborative resource in children’s L2 learning. Applied Linguistics, 26(2), 169–191. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amh042.
Coates, J. (2007). Talk in a play frame: More on laughter and intimacy. Journal of Pragmatics, 39(1), 29–49. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2006.05.003.
Cook, G. (2000). Language play, language learning. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Du Bois, J. W. (1986). Self-evidence and ritual speech. In Evidentiality (pp. 313–336). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
Dynel, M. (2009). Beyond a joke: Types of conversational humour. Linguistics and Language Compass, 3(5), 1284–1299. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1749-818X.2009.00152.x.
Goffman, E. (1974). Frame analysis. Boston: Northeastern University Press.
Goffman, E. (1981). Forms of talk. Oxford: Blackwell.
Gordon, C. (2002). “I’m Mommy and you’ re Natalie”: Role-reversal and embedded frames in mother-child discourse. Language in Society, 31(5), 679–720. https://doi.org/10.1017/S004740450231501X.
Holmes, J. (2000). Politeness, power and provocation: How humour functions in the workplace. Discourse Studies, 2(2), 159–185. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461445600002002002.
Holmes, J. (2007). Making humour work: Creativity on the job. Applied Linguistics, 28(4), 518–537. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amm048.
Morreall, J. (1987). The philosophy of laughter and humour. New York: State University of New York.
Norrick, N. R. (1993). Conversational joking: Humour in everyday talk. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
Rampton, B. (2006a). Language crossing. In J. Maybin & J. Swann (Eds.), The art of English: Everyday creativity (pp. 131–139). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
Rampton, B. (2006b). Language in late modernity: Interaction in an urban school. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Tannen, D. (2006). Intertextuality in interaction: Reframing family arguments in public and private. Text and Talk, 26(4–5), 597–617. https://doi.org/10.1515/TEXT.2006.024.
Tannen, D. (2007). Talking voices: Repetition, dialogue, and imagery in conversational discourse (2nd ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2020 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Hann, D. (2020). Prior Talk: A Key Resource for Play. In: Spontaneous Play in the Language Classroom. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-26304-1_7
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-26304-1_7
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-26303-4
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-26304-1
eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)