Abstract
This chapter is the first of three which are dedicated to a case study of a pair of learners and their teacher. It looks in detail at how the challenges and risks of playing in the target language are manifest in the data where failure can throw light on the linguistic and cultural challenges learners face in attempting to play. The data also reveals the importance of non-linguistic elements such as body language which the learners use to overcome the obstacles to play. Another finding is the degree to which the structures and sounds of the target language provide a resource for pleasurable play. The chapter argues that, like children, early-stage learners are not yet inured the target language’s properties and thus are more readily able to see its potential as a plaything.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
By “session” here, I am referring to an unbroken period in the classroom. Although there is no formalised timetable at BizLang, teachers and their groups usually have short breaks from the classroom every hour and a half to two hours.
- 2.
The conversation is keyed in Goffmanian terms in the sense that the question, typically a means of asking for information, is actually a means of practising a grammatical structure.
References
Attardo, S. (2000). Irony as relevant inappropriateness. Journal of Pragmatics, 32(6), 793–826. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-2166(99)00070-3.
Bakhtin, M. M. (1984). Rabelais and his world. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
Baynham, M. (1996). Humour as an interpersonal resource in adult numeracy classes. Language and Education, 10(2–3), 187–200. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500789608666708.
Bell, N. D. (2007). How native and non-native English speakers adapt to humor in intercultural interaction. Humor, 20(1), 27–48. https://doi.org/10.1515/HUMOR.2007.002.
Blommaert, J. (2010). The sociolinguistics of globalization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Boxer, D., & Cortés-Conde, F. (1997). From bonding to biting: Conversational joking and identity display. Journal of Pragmatics, 27, 275–294. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-2166(96)00031-8.
Brock, A. (2017). Modelling the complexity of humour—Insights from linguistics. Lingua, 197, 5–15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lingua.2017.04.008.
Brown, G., & Yule, G. (1983). Discourse analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Carter, R. (2004). Language and creativity: The art of common talk. Abingdon: Routledge.
Chiaro, D. (1992). The language of jokes: Analysing verbal play. London: Routledge.
Coates, J. (2007). Talk in a play frame: More on laughter and intimacy. Journal of Pragmatics, 39(1), 29–49. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2006.05.003.
Cook, G. (2000). Language play, language learning. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Crystal, D. (1998). Language play. London: Penguin Books.
DaSilva Iddings, A. C., & McCafferty, S. G. (2007). Carnival in a mainstream kindergarten classroom: A Bakhtinian analysis of second language learners’ off-task behaviors. Modern Language Journal, 91(1), 31–44. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.2007.00508.x.
Davies, C. E. (2003). How English-learners joke with native speakers: An interactional sociolinguistic perspective on humor as collaborative discourse across cultures. Journal of Pragmatics, 35(9), 1361–1385. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-2166(02)00181-9.
Goffman, E. (1974). Frame analysis. Boston: Northeastern University Press.
Gumperz, J. J. (1982). Discourse strategies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Holmes, J. (2000). Politeness, power and provocation: How humour functions in the workplace. Discourse Studies, 2(2), 159–185. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461445600002002002.
Kotthoff, H. (2003). Responding to irony in different contexts: On cognition in conversation. Journal of Pragmatics, 35(9), 1387–1411. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-2166(02)00182-0.
Seidlhofer, B. (2011). Understanding English as a Lingua Franca. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Tannen, D. (2007). Talking voices: Repetition, dialogue, and imagery in conversational discourse (2nd ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Tarone, E. (2002). Frequency effects, noticing, and creativity. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 24(2), 287–296. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263102002139.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2020 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Hann, D. (2020). A Case Study: Overcoming Failure in the Search for Common Ground. In: Spontaneous Play in the Language Classroom. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-26304-1_6
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-26304-1_6
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-26303-4
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-26304-1
eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)