Abstract
South America is the most biologically diverse continent on the planet, including anuran amphibians. However, the continent has been experiencing high levels of habitat degradation, and amphibians are considered the most endangered class of the vertebrate group globally. Therefore, the establishment of effective actions for the anuran protection in the continent is urgent. Here, we generate a spatial conservation prioritization of anurans in South America addressing different human-related and biological diversity metrics using the software MARXAN. We found that the anuran fauna of South America can be totally represented by the selection of ~19.53% of the total area of the continent. Contiguous selected areas are mainly located in the Tropical Andes and the Atlantic Forest coast. To a lesser extent, the selected areas can be also found in specific areas of Venezuela, the Brazilian Amazonian forest, and the temperate Chilean forests. In general, the contiguous areas represent forested areas within rough topographies of tropical countries and should be priority areas for anuran conservation in South America. Other areas within the tropical region, as well as in the southern temperate regions/countries, are less continuous and should involve more complex evaluations by decision-makers to foster reserve creation.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Ardron JA, Possingham HP, Klein CJ (2010) Marxan good practices handbook. Version 2. Pacific Marine Analysis and Research Association, Victoria
Ball IR, Possingham HP (2000) Marxan (v 1.8.6): marine reserve design using spatially explicit annealing. A manual prepared for the Great Barrier Reef Marine Park Authority
Ball IR, Possingham HP, Watts M (2009) Marxan and relatives: software for spatial conservation prioritisation. In: Moilanen A, Wilson KA, Possingham HP (eds) Spatial conservation prioritisation: quantitative methods and computational tools. Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK, pp 185–195
Barnosky AD, Matzke N, Tomiya S et al (2011) Has the Earth’s sixth mass extinction already arrived? Nature 471:51–57. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature09678
Becker CG, Fonseca CR, Haddad CFB et al (2007) Habitat split and the global decline of amphibians. Science 318:1775–1777
Becker CG, Rodriguez D, Lambertini C et al (2015) Historical dynamics of Batrachochytrium dendrobatidis in Amazonia. Ecography 39:954. https://doi.org/10.1111/ecog.02055
Bovo RP, Andrade DV, Toledo LF et al (2016) Physiological responses of Brazilian amphibians to an enzootic infection of the chytrid fungus Batrachochytrium dendrobatidis. Dis Aquat Org 117:245–252
Carvalho SB, Britto JC, Crespo EJ et al (2011) Incorporating evolutionary processes into conservation planning using species distribution data: a case study with the western Mediterranean herpetofauna. Divers Distrib 17:408–421. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1472-4642.2011.00752.x
Catenazzi A (2015) State of the World’s amphibians. Annu Rev Environ Resour 40:91–119
Dixo M, Metzger JP (2010) The matrix-tolerance hypothesis? An empirical test with frogs in the Atlantic Forest. Biodivers Conserv 19:3059–3071
Dobrovolski R, Loyola R, da Fonseca GAB et al (2014) Globalizing conservation efforts to save species and enhance food production. Bioscience 64:539–545. https://doi.org/10.1093/biosci/biu064
Duellman WE, Trueb L (1994) Biology of amphibians. John Hopkins University Press, Baltimore
Durán AP, Duffy JP, Gaston KJ (2014) Exclusion of agricultural lands in spatial conservation prioritization strategies: consequences for biodiversity and ecosystem service representation. Proc Biol Sci 281:20141529
Garcia RA, Cabeza M, Rahbek C et al (2014) Multiple dimensions of climate change and their implications for biodiversity. Science 344:1247579. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1247579
IUCN (2019) The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species. Version 2019-1. http://www.iucnredlist.org. Accessed 21 Mar 2019
Kukkala AS, Moilanen A (2013) Core concepts of spatial prioritization in systematic conservation planning. Biol Rev Camb Philos 88:443–464. https://doi.org/10.1111/brv.12008
Ladle RJ, Whittaker RJ (2011) Conservation biogeography. Wiley-Blackwell, West Sussex
Lagabrielle E, Lombard AT, Harris JM et al (2018) Multi-scale multi-level marine spatial planning: a novel methodological approach applied in South Africa. PLoS One 13:e0192582. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0192582
Margules CR, Pressey RL (2000) Systematic conservation planning. Nature 405:243–253
Millenium Ecosystem Assessment (2005) Ecosystems and human well-being: biodiversity synthesis. World Resources Institute, Washington, DC
Mittermeier RA, Robles-Gil P, Hoffmann M et al (2004) Hotspots revisited: Earths biologically richest and most endangered ecoregions. CEMEX, Mexico City
Moilanen A, Anderson BJ, Arponen A et al (2013) Edge artefacts and lost performance in national versus continental conservation priority areas. Divers Distrib 19:171–183
Primack R, Rozzi R, Massardo F, Feinsinger P (2001) Destrucción y degradación del habitat. In: Primack R, Rozzi R, Massardo F, Feinsinger P (eds) Fundamentos de conservación biológica: perspectivas latinoamericanas. Fondo de Cultura Económica, México, pp 183–223
Scheele BC, Pasmans F, Skerratt LF et al (2019) Amphibian fungal panzootic causes catastrophic and ongoing loss of biodiversity. Science 363:1459–1463. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aav0379
Stebins RC, Cohen NW (1995) A natural history of amphibians. Princeton University Press, New Jersey
UNEP-WCMC (2016) The State of Biodiversity in Latin America and the Caribbean: a mid-term review of progress towards the Aichi Biodiversity Targets. UNEP-WCMC, Cambridge, UK. Available at: https://www.cbd.int/gbo/gbo4/outlook-grulac-en.pdf
Valdujo PH, Silvano DL, Colli G et al (2012) Anuran species composition and distribution patterns in the Brazilian Cerrado, a neotropical hotspot. S Am J Herpetol 7:63–78. http://www.bioone.org/doi/full/10.2994/057.007.0209
Vasconcelos TS, Doro JLP (2016) Assessing how habitat loss restricts the geographic range of Neotropical anurans. Ecol Res 31:913–921
Vasconcelos TS, Prado VHM (2019) Climate change and opposing spatial conservation priorities for anuran protection in the Brazilian hotspots. J Nat Conserv 49:118–124. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jnc.2019.04.003
Vasconcelos TS, Nascimento BTM, Prado VHM (2018) Expected impacts of climate change threaten the anuran diversity in the Brazilian hotspots. Ecol Evol 2018(8):7894–7906. https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.4357
Wake DB, Koo MS (2018) Primer: amphibians. Curr Biol 28:R1221–R1242
Whitmore TC (1997) Tropical forest disturbance, disappearance, and species loss. In: Laurance WF, Bierregaard RO Jr (eds) Tropical forest remnants: ecology, management, and conservation of fragmented communities. The University of Chicago Press, Chicago, pp 3–12
Whittaker RJ, Araújo MB, Jepson P et al (2005) Conservation biogeography: assessment and prospect. Divers Distrib 11:3–23
Wildlife Conservation Society - WCS, Center for International Earth Science Information Network - CIESIN - Columbia University (2005) Last of the Wild Project, Version 2, 2005 (LWP-2): Global Human Footprint Dataset (Geographic)
Acknowledgments
The authors have been continuously supported by research grants and/or fellowships from the Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo (FAPESP 2011/18510-0; 2013/50714-0; 2016/13949-7), Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (CNPq 2037/2014-9; 431012/2016-4; 308687/2016-17; 114613/2018-4), and University Research and Scientific Production Support Program of the Goias State University (PROBIP/UEG).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Vasconcelos, T.S., da Silva, F.R., dos Santos, T.G., Prado, V.H.M., Provete, D.B. (2019). Spatial Conservation Prioritization for the Anuran Fauna of South America. In: Biogeographic Patterns of South American Anurans. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-26296-9_7
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-26296-9_7
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-26295-2
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-26296-9
eBook Packages: Biomedical and Life SciencesBiomedical and Life Sciences (R0)