Skip to main content

Abstract

Perceptual evaluation of the voice is necessary to identify and characterize a voice disorder, to assess change over time, and to determine need for intervention. In this chapter, we discuss the importance of perceptual evaluation, differences between children’s and adults’ voices, perceptual aspects of voice, and how to conduct a perceptual evaluation of the pediatric voice.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Aronson A, Bless D. Clinical Voice Disorders. 4th ed. New York: Thieme; 2009.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Hirano M. Clinical examination of voice. New York: Springer-Verlag; 1981.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Kempster GB, Gerratt BR, Verdolini Abbott K, Barkmeier-Kraemer J, Hillman RE. Consensus auditory-perceptual evaluation of voice: development of a standardized clinical protocol. Am J Speech Lang Pathol. 2009;18. United States:124–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Hartley NA, Braden M, Thibeault SL. Practice patterns of speech-language pathologists in pediatric vocal health. Am J Speech Lang Pathol. 2017;26(2):281–300.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Maturo S, Hill C, Bunting G, Ballif C, Maurer R, Hartnick C. Establishment of a normative pediatric acoustic database. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2012;138(10):956–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Hirano M, Kurita S, Nakashima T. Growth, development and aging of human vocal folds. In: Bless D, Abbs J, editors. Vocal fold physiology. San Diego: College-Hill Press; 1983.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Schweinfurth JM, Thibeault SL. Does hyaluronic acid distribution in the larynx relate to the newborn’s capacity for crying? Laryngoscope. 2008;118(9):1692–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Hill CA, Ojha S, Maturo S, Maurer R, Bunting G, Hartnick CJ. Consistency of voice frequency and perturbation measures in children. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2013;148:637–41. England.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Stathopoulos ET, Sapienza CM. Developmental changes in laryngeal and respiratory function with variations in sound pressure level. J Speech Lang Hear Res. 1997;40(3):595–614.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Lopes LW, Barbosa Lima IL, Alves Almeida LN, Cavalcante DP, de Almeida AA. Severity of voice disorders in children: correlations between perceptual and acoustic data. J Voice. 2012;26(6):819.e7–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Patel RR, Dixon A, Richmond A, Donohue KD. Pediatric high speed digital imaging of vocal fold vibration: a normative pilot study of glottal closure and phase closure characteristics. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2012;76(7):954–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Barsties B, De Bodt M. Assessment of voice quality: current state-of-the-art. Auris Nasus Larynx. 2015;42(3):183–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Wilson DK. Voice problems of children. 3rd ed. Baltimore: Williams and Wilkins; 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Kent RD. Hearing and believing: some limits to the auditory-perceptual assessment of speech and voice disorders. Am J Speech Lang Pathol. 1996;5(3):7–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Zraick RI, Kempster GB, Connor NP, Thibeault S, Klaben BK, Bursac Z, et al. Establishing validity of the consensus auditory-perceptual evaluation of voice (CAPE-V). Am J Speech Lang Pathol. 2011;20. United States:14–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Wolfe VI, Ratusnik DL. Acoustic and perceptual measurements of roughness influencing judgments of pitch. J Speech Hear Disord. 1988;53(1):15–22.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Sauder C, Eadie T. Does the accuracy of medical diagnoses affect novice listeners’ auditory-perceptual judgments of dysphonia severity? J Voice. 2018. pii: S0892-1997(18)30156-5.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Kreiman J, Gerratt BR, Kempster GB, Erman A, Berke GS. Perceptual evaluation of voice quality: review, tutorial, and a framework for future research. J Speech Hear Res. 1993;36(1):21–40.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Anand S, Skowronski MD, Shrivastav R, Eddins DA. Perceptual and quantitative assessment of dysphonia across vowel categories. J Voice. 2018. pii: S0892-1997(17)30492-7.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Gerratt BR, Kreiman J, Garellek M. Comparing measures of voice quality from sustained phonation and continuous speech. J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2016;59(5):994–1001.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Kelchner LN, Brehm SB, Weinrich B, Middendorf J, deAlarcon A, Levin L, et al. Perceptual evaluation of severe pediatric voice disorders: rater reliability using the consensus auditory perceptual evaluation of voice. J Voice. 2010;24(4):441–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Baker S, Kelchner L, Weinrich B, Lee L, Willging P, Cotton R, et al. Pediatric laryngotracheal stenosis and airway reconstruction: a review of voice outcomes, assessment, and treatment issues. J Voice. 2006;20(4):631–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Chan KM, Yiu EM. The effect of anchors and training on the reliability of perceptual voice evaluation. J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2002;45(1):111–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. American Speech Language and Hearing Association. CAPE-V procedures and form. Available from: https://www.asha.org/uploadedFiles/ASHA/SIG/03/CAPE-V-Procedures-and-Form.pdf.

  25. Karnell MP, Melton SD, Childes JM, Coleman TC, Dailey SA, Hoffman HT. Reliability of clinician-based (GRBAS and CAPE-V) and patient-based (V-RQOL and IPVI) documentation of voice disorders. J Voice. 2007;21(5):576–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Goodglass H, Kaplan E, Barresi B. The assessment of aphasia and related disorders. 3rd ed. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Berube S, Nonnemacher J, Demsky C, Glenn S, Saxena S, Wright A, et al. Stealing cookies in the twenty-first century: measures of spoken narrative in healthy versus speakers with aphasia. Am J Speech Lang Pathol. 2018;28:1–9.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Martens JW, Versnel H, Dejonckere PH. The effect of visible speech in the perceptual rating of pathological voices. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2007;133(2):178–85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Gerratt BR, Kreiman J. Measuring vocal quality with speech synthesis. J Acoust Soc Am. 2001;110(5 Pt 1):2560–6.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Kreiman J, Gerratt BR, Ito M. When and why listeners disagree in voice quality assessment tasks. J Acoust Soc Am. 2007;122(4):2354–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Maia N. Braden .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Braden, M.N., Blakeslee, S.D.M. (2020). Perceptual Evaluation of Voice. In: McMurray, J., Hoffman, M., Braden, M. (eds) Multidisciplinary Management of Pediatric Voice and Swallowing Disorders. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-26191-7_12

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-26191-7_12

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-26190-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-26191-7

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics