Skip to main content

Revisiting the Business Model Canvas as a Common Language

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Design Thinking for Strategy

Part of the book series: Management for Professionals ((MANAGPROF))

  • 5401 Accesses

Abstract

With the use of design thinking to address strategic business challenges, the concept of business model has gained traction. The business model canvas, introduced by Pigneur and Osterwalder in 2011, is a visual language for communicating about strategy. It helps structuring gained insights and transforming them into knowledge. It supports designing and validating strategic options efficiently and effectively. Early in the strategy design process, the lightweight business model, a simplified version of the business model canvas, supports the identification of the high-level characteristics on which a firm’s competitive positioning is defined. It helps identify what makes a firm in particular, competitors in general, and an industry as a whole, valuable and unique. The detailed business model, an extended version of the lightweight business model, supports successfully defining the details on how the strategy delivers value to customers in particular, and stakeholders in general. It simplifies the strategy design process and ensures that resources are focused on those aspects that matter most and non-value adding analysis are avoided.

Fact is, inventing an innovative business model is often mostly a matter of serendipity—Gary Hamel

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    The DuPont analysis is an expression which breaks ROE (return on equity) into its parts. Its name comes from the DuPont Corporation that started using this formula in the 1920s. DuPont explosives salesman Donaldson Brown invented this formula in an internal efficiency report in 1912.

References

  • Barney, J. B. (1991). Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. Journal of Management, 17(1), 99–120.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bendle, N. T., Farris, P. W., Pfeifer, P. E., & Reibstein, D. J. (2016). Marketing metrics: The manager’s guide to measuring marketing performance (3rd ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Christensen, C. M., Hall, T., Dillon, K., & Duncan, D. S. (2016a). Know your customers’ “jobs to be done”. Harvard Business Review, 94(9), 54–62.

    Google Scholar 

  • Christensen, C. M., Hall, T., Dillon, K., & Duncan, D. S. (2016b). Competing against luck: The story of innovation and customer choice. New York, NY: HarperCollins Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Court, D., Elzinga, D., Mulder, S., & Vetvik, O. J. (2009). The consumer decision journey. McKinsey Quarterly (3).

    Google Scholar 

  • Diderich, C. (2017). Initiating the strategy process using design thinking. Change Management Strategy eJournal 9(8). SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2927941 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2927941.

  • Drucker, P. F. (2006). The effective executive: The definitive guide to getting the right things done. New York, NY: Harper Collins.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liedtka, J., & Ogilvie, T. (2011). Designing for growth. New York, NY: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liedtka, J., Ogilvie, T., & Brozenske, R. (2014). The design for growth field book. New York, NY: Columbia University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Markides, C., & Geroski, P. A. (2004). Racing to be second. Business Strategy Review, 15(4), 25–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Osterwalder, A., & Pigneur, Y. (2010). Business model generation. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Osterwalder, A., Pigneur, Y., Bernarda, G., & Smith, A. (2014). Value propositon design. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Porter, M. E. (1979). How competitive forces shape strategy. Harvard Business Review, 57(2), 137–145.

    Google Scholar 

  • Porter, M. E. (1985). Competitive advantage. New York, NY: The Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shafer, S. M., Smith, H. J., & Linder, J. C. (2005). The power of business models. Business Horizons, 48, 199–207.

    Google Scholar 

  • Treacy, M., & Wiersema, F. (1995). The discipline of market leaders: Choose your customers, narrow your focus, dominate your market. New York, NY: Perseus Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zott, C., Amit, R., & Massa, L. (2011). The business model: Recent developments and future research. Journal of Management, 37(4), 1019–1042.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Diderich, C. (2020). Revisiting the Business Model Canvas as a Common Language. In: Design Thinking for Strategy. Management for Professionals. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-25875-7_3

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics