Skip to main content

Sparsified and Twisted Residual Autoencoders

Mapping Cartesian Factors to the Entorhinal-Hippocampal Complex

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Biologically Inspired Cognitive Architectures 2019 (BICA 2019)

Part of the book series: Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing ((AISC,volume 948))

Included in the following conference series:

  • 838 Accesses

Abstract

Previously, we have put forth the concept of Cartesian abstraction and argued that it can yield ‘cognitive maps’. We suggested a general mechanism and presented deep learning based numerical simulations: an observed factor (head direction) was non-linearly projected to form a discretized representation (head direction cells). That representation, in turn, enabled the development of a complementing factor (place cells) from high dimensional (visual) inputs. It has been shown that a related metric, in the form of oriented hexagonal grids, may also be derived. Elements of the algorithms were connected to the entorhinal-hippocampal complex (EHC loop). Here, we make one step further in the mapping to the neural substrate. We consider (i) the features of signals arriving at deep and superficial CA1 pyramidal cells, (ii) the interplay between lateral and medial entorhinal cortex efferents, and the nature of ‘instructive’ input timing-dependent plasticity, a feature of the loop. We suggest that the circuitry corresponds to a special form of Residual Networks that we call Sparsified and Twisted Residual Autoencoder (ST-RAE). We argue that ST-RAEs can learn Cartesian Factors and fit the structure and the working of the entorhinal-hippocampal complex to a reasonable extent, including certain oscillatory properties. We put forth the idea that the factor learning architecture of ST-RAEs has a double role in serving goal-oriented behavior, such as (a) the lowering the dimensionality of the task and (b) the mitigation of the problem of partial observation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 139.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 179.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Scoville WB, Milner B (1957) Loss of recent memory after bilateral hippocampal lesions. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 20:11–21

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Cohen NJ, Squire LR (1980) Preserved learning and retention of pattern analyzing skill in amnesia: dissociation of knowing how and knowing that. Science 210:207–210

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. O’Keefe J, Dostrovsky J (1971) The hippocampus as a spatial map. Preliminary evidence from unit activity in the freely-moving rat. Brain Res 34:171–175

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Knowlton BJ, Squire LR (1993) The learning of categories: parallel brain systems for item memory and category knowledge. Science 262(5140):1747–1749

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Lavenex P, Lavenex PB, Amaral DG (2007) Spatial relational learning persists following neonatal hippocampal lesions in macaque monkeys. Nat Neurosci 10(2):234

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Moser EI, Kropff E, Moser MB (2008) Place cells, grid cells, and the brain’s spatial representation system. Annu Rev Neurosci 31:69–89

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Yartsev MM, Ulanovsky N (2013) Representation of three-dimensional space in the hippocampus of flying bats. Science 340(6130):367–372

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Constantinescu AO, O’Reilly JX, Behrens TE (2016) Organizing conceptual knowledge in humans with a gridlike code. Science 352(6292):1464–1468

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Lőrincz A (2016) Cartesian abstraction can yield ‘cognitive maps’. Procedia Comput Sci 88:259–271

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Lőrincz A, Sárkány A (2017) Semi-supervised learning of cartesian factors: a top-down model of the entorhinal hippocampal complex. Front Psychol 8:215

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Banino A, Barry C, Uria B, Blundell C, Lillicrap T, Mirowski P, Wayne G, Pritzel A, Chadwick MJ, Degris T, Modayil J, Wayne G, Soyer H, Viola F, Zhang B, Goroshin N, Rabinowitz N, Pascanu R, Beattie C, Petersen S, Sadik A, Gaffney S, King H, Kavukcuoglu K, Hassabis D, Hadsell R, Kumaran D (2018) Vector-based navigation using grid-like representations in artificial agents. Nature 557(7705):429–433

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Garg R, Kumar VBG, Carneiro G, Reid I (2016) Unsupervised CNN for single view depth estimation: Geometry to the rescue. In: European conference on computer vision. Springer, Cham, pp 740–756

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  13. Godard C, Mac Aodha O, Brostow GJ (2017) Unsupervised monocular depth estimation with left-right consistency. In: Proceedings of the IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, pp 270–279

    Google Scholar 

  14. Lőrincz A, Buzsáki G (2000) Two-phase computational model training long-term memories in the entorhinal-hippocampal region. Ann N Y Acad Sci 911(1):83–111

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Chrobak JJ, Lőrincz A, Buzsáki G (2000) Physiological patterns in the hippocampo-entorhinal cortex system. Hippocampus 10(4):457–465

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Lőrincz A, Szirtes G (2009) Here and now: how time segments may become events in the hippocampus. Neural Netw 22(5–6):738–747

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Jaeger H (2002) Tutorial on training recurrent neural networks, covering BPPT, RTRL, EKF and the “echo state network” approach, vol 5. GMD-Forschungszentrum Informationstechnik, Bonn

    Google Scholar 

  18. Maass W, Natschläger T, Markram H (2002) Real-time computing without stable states: a new framework for neural computation based on perturbations. Neural Comput 14(11):2531–2560

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Szita I, Gyenes V, Lőrincz A (2006) Reinforcement learning with echo state networks. In: International conference on artificial neural networks. Springer, Heidelberg, pp 830–839

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  20. Johnson MG, Hudson EL (1988) A variable delay line PLL for CPU-coprocessor synchronization. IEEE J Solid-State Circuits 23(5):1218–1223

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Lőrincz A (1998) Forming independent components via temporal locking of reconstruction architectures: a functional model of the hippocampus. Biol Cybern 79(3):263–275

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Markram H, Gerstner W, Sjöström PJ (2012) Spike-timing-dependent plasticity: a comprehensive overview. Front Synaptic Neurosci 4:2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Dudman JT, Tsay D, Siegelbaum SA (2007) A role for synaptic inputs at distal dendrites: instructive signals for hippocampal long-term plasticity. Neuron 56(5):866–879

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Basu J, Zaremba JD, Cheung SK, Hitti FL, Zemelman BV, Losonczy A, Siegelbaum SA (2016) Gating of hippocampal activity, plasticity and memory by entorhinal cortex long-range inhibition. Science 351(6269):aaa5694

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Mizuseki K, Diba K, Pastalkova E, Buzsáki G (2011) Hippocampal CA1 pyramidal cells form functionally distinct sublayers. Nat Neurosci 14(9):1174

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Valero M, de la Prida LM (2018) The hippocampus in depth: a sublayer-specific perspective of entorhinal–hippocampal function. Curr Opin Neurobiol 52:107–114

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Sanders H, Ji D, Sasaki T, Leutgeb JK, Wilson MA, Lisman JE (2019) Temporal coding and rate remapping: representation of nonspatial information in the hippocampus. Hippocampus 29(2):111–127

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Herzog LE, Pascual LM, Scott SJ, Mathieson ER, Katz DB, Jadhav SP (2019) Interaction of taste and place coding in the hippocampus. J Neurosci 39(16):3057–3069

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Szita I, Lorincz A (2008) Factored value iteration converges. Acta Cybern 18(4):615–635

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  30. Szita I, Lőrincz A (2009) Optimistic initialization and greediness lead to polynomial time learning in factored MDPs. In: Proceedings of the 26th annual int. conf on machine learning. ACM, pp 1001–1008

    Google Scholar 

  31. Miller R (1989) Cortico-hippocampal interplay: self-organizing phase-locked loops for indexing memory. Psychobiology 17(2):115–128

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The research has been supported by the European Union, co-financed by the European Social Fund (EFOP-3.6.3-VEKOP-16-2017-00002) and by the ELTE Institutional Excellence Program (1783-3/2018/FEKUTSRAT) supported by the Hungarian Ministry of Human Capacities.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to András Lőrincz .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Lőrincz, A. (2020). Sparsified and Twisted Residual Autoencoders. In: Samsonovich, A. (eds) Biologically Inspired Cognitive Architectures 2019. BICA 2019. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, vol 948. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-25719-4_41

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics