Skip to main content

Enhancing a Structured Communication Between the Community Pregnancy Services and the Hospital Maternal Area: A Tool for the Handover Process in High - Risk Pregnancy Through an Ethnographic Study Conducted in the Toscana Centro Trust

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Health and Social Care Systems of the Future: Demographic Changes, Digital Age and Human Factors (HEPS 2019)

Part of the book series: Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing ((AISC,volume 1012))

Included in the following conference series:

  • 595 Accesses

Abstract

Communication between health facilities is one of the fundamental elements for a proper management of women during pregnancy and delivery. Failures of the process, mainly due to an absence of a structured handover, are closely associated with adverse events and near misses. This research has two main aims: to assess the presence and characteristics of the handover process between a community pregnancy service and a hospital maternal area in high-risk pregnancy and to design and test a tool for a structured transfer of clinical information between these two settings. An ethnographic study was conducted through participated observations. From the observations, researchers have been able to define a minimum set of information critical for any referral and that need to be included in any handover between the sending and the receiving setting.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Wong, M.C., Yee, K.C., Turner, P.: Clinical Handover Literature Review. eHealth Services Research Group University of Tasmania, Australia (2008). http://www.thoracic.org.au/. Last accessed June 2018

  2. Toccafondi, G., Albolino, S., Tartaglia, R., et al.: The collaborative communication mode for patient handover at the interface between high-acuity and low-acuity care. BMJ Qual. Saf. 21(Suppl. 1), i58–66 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Joint Commission Homepage (2011). http://www.jointcommission.org/Sentinel_Event_Statistcs. Last accessed July 2018

  4. Bhabra, G., Mackeith, S., Monteiro, P., et al.: An experimental comparison of handover methods. Ann. R. Coll. Surg. Engl. 89, 298–300 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Toccafondi, G., Albolino, S., Bellandi, T., Venneri, F.: Handover process: how to improve quality and safety through an ergonomic solution. Work 41(Suppl. 1), 2941–2945 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  6. WHO (World Health Organisation) Homepage. http://www.who.int/patientsafety/implementation/solutions/high5s/cim_guide. Last accessed 13 Jan 2019

  7. Pezzolesi, C., Schifano, F., Pickles, J., Randell, W., Hussain, Z., Muir, H., Dhillon, S.: Clinical handover incident reporting in one UK general hospital. Int. J. Qual. Health Care 22(5), 396–401 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Till, A., Sall, H., Wilkinson, J.: Safe handover: safe patients - the electronic handover system. BMJ Open Qual. 2, u202926.w1359 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. BMA, Junior Doctors Committee, National Patient Safety Agency, NHS Modernisation Agency: Safe Handover: Safe Patients. Guidance on Clinical Handover for Clinicians and Managers. BMA, London (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Northern Devon Healthcare NHS Trust Homepage. http://www.northdevonhealth.nhs.uk. Last accessed Sep 2018

  11. Norfolk and Norwich University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust Homepage. http://www.nnuh.nhs.uk/. Last accessed Sep 2018

  12. Boaro, N., Fancott, C., Baker, R., et al.: Using SBAR to improve communication. J. Interprof. Care 24(1), 111–114 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Haig, K.M., Sutton, S., Whittington, J.: SBAR: a shared model for in between clinicians. Jt. Comm. J. Qual. Patient Saf. 32(3), 167–175 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Ahmed, J., Mehmood, S., Rehman, S., Ilyas, C., Khan, L.U.R.: Impact of a structured template and staff training on compliance and quality of clinical handover. Int. J. Surg. 10(9), 571–574 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Hesselink, G., Schoonhoven, L., Barach, P., et al.: Improving patient handovers from hospital to primary care: a systematic review. Ann. Intern. Med. 157(6), 417–428 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Owen, R., Candelier, C.: A ‘modified’ CHAPs tool – an effective system for handover of care between medical staff in a maternity unit setting. Arch. Dis. Child.-Fetal Neonatal Ed. 95(Supplement 1), Fa66–Fa67 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Maria Bonito .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Bonito, M., Albolino, S., Dagliana, G., Toccafondi, G., Dubini, V. (2019). Enhancing a Structured Communication Between the Community Pregnancy Services and the Hospital Maternal Area: A Tool for the Handover Process in High - Risk Pregnancy Through an Ethnographic Study Conducted in the Toscana Centro Trust. In: Cotrim, T., Serranheira, F., Sousa, P., Hignett, S., Albolino, S., Tartaglia, R. (eds) Health and Social Care Systems of the Future: Demographic Changes, Digital Age and Human Factors. HEPS 2019. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, vol 1012. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-24067-7_14

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics