Skip to main content
  • 439 Accesses

Abstract

To have a better understanding of OL, it is critical to explore how an organization maybe transitioned into an LO, how its OL process is initiated, driven, enabled, facilitated, and measured. This chapter introduces OL as a continuous process called DELO (Driving, Enabling, Learning, Outcome). Each of the core components along the DELO process is discussed in details in this chapter.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Bourne M, Neely A, Platts K, Mills J (2002) The success and failure of performance measurement initiatives: perceptions of participating managers. Int J Oper Prod Manage 22(11):1288–1310

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chatman JA, Barsade SG (1995) Personality, organizational culture and cooperation, evidence from a business simulation. Adm Sci Q 40(3):423–443

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Christensen KS, Bang HK (2003) Knowledge management in a project-oriented organization: three perspectives. J Knowl Manage 7(3):116–128

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clarke J, Thorpe R, Anderson L, Gold J (2006) It’s all action, it’s all learning: action learning in SMEs. J Eur Ind Training 30(6):441–455

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cook DN, Yanow D (1993) Culture and organizational learning. J Manage Inquiry 2(4):373–390

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deshpande R, Farley JU, Webster FE (1993) Corporate culture, customer orientation, and innovativeness in Japanese firms: a quadrad analysis. J Mark 57:23–27

    Google Scholar 

  • DiBella AJ, Nevis EC, Gould JM (1996) Understanding organizational learning capability. J Manage Stud 33(3):361

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Foil M, Lyles M (1985) Organizational learning. Acad Manage Rev 10(4):803–813

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Garvin DA (1993) Building a learning organization. Harvard Bus Rev 1993:78–91

    Google Scholar 

  • Garvin DA (1994) Building a learning organization. Business Credit. New York 96(1):19

    Google Scholar 

  • Hofstede G (1991) Cultures and organizations: software of the mind. McGraw-Hill, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Jashapara A (2003) Cognition, culture and competition: an empirical test of the learning organization. Learn Organ 10(1):31–50

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaplan R, Norton D (1992) The balanced scorecard, measures that drive performance. Harvard Bus Rev 70(1):71–79

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaplan R, Norton D (1996a) The balanced scorecard: translating strategy into action. Harvard Business School Press, Boston, MA

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaplan R, Norton D (1996b) Using the balanced scorecard as a strategic management system. Harvard Bus Rev 74(1):75–87

    Google Scholar 

  • Kimberly JR, Miles RH (1980) The organizational life cycle. Jossey-Bass, San Francisco

    Google Scholar 

  • Law KMY (2009) From driving to learning: the organizational learning process. IEEE Eng Manage Rev 37(1):66–79

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Law KMY, Chuah KB (2004) Project-based action learning as learning approach in learning organization—the theory and framework. Team Perform Manage Int J 10(7/8):178–186

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Law KMY, Chuah KB (2015) PAL driven organizational learning: theory and practices, a light on learning journey of organizations. Springer, Cham

    Google Scholar 

  • Limerick D, Passfield R, Cunnington B (1994) Transformational change: towards an action learning organization. The Learn Organ 1(2):29–40

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Loo ID (2006) Action and organizational learning in an elevator company. Learn Organ 13(2/3):204

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maier R, Remus U (2002) Defining process-oriented knowledge management strategies. Knowl Process Manage 9(2):103

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mintzberg H (1991) The effective organization: forces and forms. Sloan Manage Rev (Winter):54–67

    Google Scholar 

  • Nonaka I (1994) A dynamic theory of organizational knowledge creation. Organ Sci 5(1):14–37

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ouchi WG (1979) A conceptual framework for the design of organizational control mechanisms. Manage Sci 25(9):833

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Quinn RE, Rohrbaugh J (1983) A spatial model of effectiveness criteria: towards a competing values approach to organizational analysis. Manage Sci 29(3):363

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Revans R (1982) The origins and growth of action learning. Chartwell Bratt, Bromley

    Google Scholar 

  • Senge PM (1990) The fifth discipline: the art & practice of the learning organization. Currency Doubleday, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith PAC, Tosey P (1999a) Assessing the learning organization: part 1—theoretical foundations. Learn Organ 6(2):70–75

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith PAC, Tosey P (1999b) Assessing the learning organization: part 2—exploring practical assessment approaches. Learn Organ 6(3):107–115

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sun PY, Scott JL (2003) Towards better qualitative performance measurement in organizations. Learn Organ 10(5):258–271

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Trice HM, Beyer JM (1984) Studying organizational culture through rites and ceremonials. Acad Manage Rev 9:653

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Verweire K, Van den Berghe L (2003) Integrated performance management: adding a new dimension. Manage Decis 41(8):782–790

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wooldridge BR, Minsky BD (2002) The role of climate and socialization in development inter-functional coordination. Learn Organ 9(1):29–38

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yeo R (2002) Learning within organizations: linking the theoretical and empirical perspectives. J Workplace Learn 14(3):109–122

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kris M. Y. Law .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Law, K.M.Y., Chuah, K.B. (2020). Organizational Learning Process as DELO. In: Law, K., Chuah, K. (eds) Project Action Learning (PAL) Guidebook: Practical Learning in Organizations. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-23997-8_4

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-23997-8_4

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-23996-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-23997-8

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics