Skip to main content

Part of the book series: Contributions to Phenomenology ((CTPH,volume 104))

  • 167 Accesses

Abstract

In this chapter, I explicate how Patočka’s early concept of phenomenology, as presented in his dissertation, was inspired by Husserl. I clarify why Husserl’s phenomenology was attractive for Patočka: Phenomenology as a transcendental theory of experience discovers conditions of the possibility of all reality, and it proceeds as a pure science because its method is not constructive but intuitive, observing. Summarizing Patočka’s analysis of the epistemic process, I explicate his early idea of the relation between finite consciousness and reality. I pay attention to the tension between Patočka’s rejection of absolute idealism and his idea that phenomenology has its point of departure in “something like intellectus dei infinitus.” Finally, I discuss the ontological limits of Patočka’s early transcendentalism.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    So far as I know, the only paper focused exclusively on Patočka’s dissertation has been written by Učník (2015). In German, a concise interpretation of Patočka’s dissertation is offered by Novotný (1999: esp. 137–142).

  2. 2.

    Regarding this fore-knowing, cf. also Učník (2015: 35–36).

  3. 3.

    The importance of the notion of life in Patočka’s early philosophy has been emphasized by Novotný (1995) and Hagedorn (2015).

  4. 4.

    Accordingly, one can say with Novotný that “[d]er Wirklichkeitsbezug der Evidenz ist für Patočka nicht als das Bergsonsche Koinzidieren mit dem schaffenden Prozeß des Geistes aufzufassen“(Novotný 1999: 140).

References

  • Hagedorn, Ludger. 2015. “Quicquid Cogitat.” On the Uses and Disadvantages of Subjectivity. In The Phenomenological Critique of Mathematisation and the Question of Responsibility, ed. Ivan Chvatík and Lubica Učník, 89–104. Dordrecht: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Novotný, Karel. 1995. Dějinnost a svoboda. Heidegger a Patočkova raná filosofie dějin. Reflexe 14 (2): 1–2.36. Praha.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1999. Erscheinung des Ganzen. Patočkas phänomenologische Philosophie der dreissiger Jahre bezüglich seines Spätwerks. In Jan Patočka, Texte, Dokumente, Bibliographie, ed. Ludger Hagedorn and Hans Reiner Sepp, 137–169. München/Prag: Verlag Karl Alber.

    Google Scholar 

  • Patočka, Jan. 2008. Pojem evidence a jeho význam pro noetiku. In Fenomenologické spisy I, ed. Ivan Chvatík and Jan Frei, 14–125. Praha: Oikúmené.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2016. The Natural World as a Philosophical Problem. In The Natural World as a Philosophical Problem, Trans. Erika Abrams, 1–114. Evanston: Northwestern University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Učník, Lubica. 2015. Jan Patočka: From the Concept of Evidence to the Natural World and Beyond. In The Phenomenological Critique of Mathematisation and the Question of Responsibility, ed. Ivan Chvatík and Lubica Učník, 31–42. Dordrecht: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Ritter, M. (2019). Seeking Evidence. In: Into the World: The Movement of Patočka's Phenomenology. Contributions to Phenomenology, vol 104. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-23657-1_2

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics