Skip to main content

Part of the book series: English Language Education ((ELED,volume 18))

Abstract

In this chapter, I will first provide some general information about the German school system and more specifically the educational context in the German state of Thuringia, since this study focuses on this context. I will then introduce the young L2 learners of English that took part in the study and represent two different L2 learning contexts: an immersion context in which English is the official language, and a typical foreign language context in which English is only spoken in designated foreign language lessons. Subsequently, I will describe the data collection techniques that were employed to elicit written and spoken data from the young learners. I will then provide background information on the EFL primary school teachers that completed the teacher survey, and on how the teacher survey was developed and distributed. Following this, the textbooks and picture books that were analysed in this study are introduced. I will then describe the different speech act frameworks that I used in this project.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Thus, because in contrast to states like Bavaria or Lower Saxony which did not undergo a name-change since the second world war, Thuringia tends to be less well-known internationally than some other parts of Germany.

  2. 2.

    This body is described as follows:

    A decisive factor in the development of the German education system in a similar direction as from 1945 on was the cooperation of the Länder in the Kultusministerkonferenz (KMK), or Standing Conference of the Ministers of Education and Cultural Affairs of the Länder in the Federal Republic of Germany, which was founded in 1948. The Unification Treaty of 1990 (Einigungsvertrag) between the Federal Republic of Germany and the German Democratic Republic required the five Länder in eastern Germany to lay the legislative foundations for the reorganisation of education by 30 June 1991. (Secretariat of the Standing Conference of the Ministers of Education and Cultural Affairs of the Länder in the Federal Republic of Germany 2015, p. 12)

  3. 3.

    See Thüringer Schulordnung (2015) or Thüringer Schulgesetz (2003, § 4 – Schularten)

  4. 4.

    There is one exception and this is the subject German, which is taught in German.

  5. 5.

    Although it would of course have been ideal to have an equal number of young learners in both groups this was unfortunately not possible because the number of parents granting permission for their child to take part in this study was lower in the first than in the second school.

  6. 6.

    In the private international group, there were two 8-year olds and in the state primary school three children chose not to disclose their ages (one in group A and two in group respectively).

  7. 7.

    Both tasks are included in the appendix to this chapter. Due to copyright issues, the original images used in the written task are not included and have been replaced by a written place-holder. The task script followed by the research assistant regarding the spoken task is included in its original.

  8. 8.

    The tasks were developed in consultation with two of my research assistants who were familiar with Thuringian primary school EFL classes and could therefore advise on frequently used task types.

  9. 9.

    This was done deliberately to attract as many teachers as possible and to allow them to withhold information that they felt could have identified them or their school.

  10. 10.

    See Ordnung der Ersten Prüfung für ein Lehramt an öffentlichen Schulen (2008) and Ordnung der Zweiten Staatsprüfung für ein Lehramt an öffentlichen Schulen (2004), the legal texts that set out the requirements for the erste und zweite Staatsexamen in Bavaria ratified by the Bayerische Staatskanzlei for more information.

  11. 11.

    Foreign language instruction is compulsory in Thuringia from primary school grade 3. However, some schools provide English instruction from an earlier grade.

  12. 12.

    Responses to questions in this part of the survey provided the basis of Sect. 3.3.1.

  13. 13.

    For example, Please tick the box next to the age range that you belong to.

  14. 14.

    This also means that I did not investigate any additional materials that are available for the textbooks series and can be accessed/purchased by young L2 learners (e.g. workbooks, audio cds, movies, online materials). The reason for this was that not all learners may have access to all of additional materials available, whereas if a textbook is used in class, then at the very least all learners should have access to the textbook. See also Sect. 6.10 for results on the use of additional and supplementary materials in Thuringian EFL primary classrooms.

  15. 15.

    See Appendix C for a complete list of questions included in the teachers’ survey.

References

  • Andrea, G., & Wojtowycz, D. (2009). The lion who wanted to love. London: Hachette.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aschkar, S., Beattie, T., Kerler, N., & Schröder, C. (2016). Sunshine: Pupil’s book 3. Berlin: Cornelsen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aschkar, S., Beattie, T., Kerler, N., Schröder, C., & Skejic, M. (2015). Sunshine: Pupil’s book 4. Berlin: Cornelsen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baldacchino, C., & Malenfant, I. (2016). Morris Micklewhite and the Tangerine Dress. Toronto: Groundwood Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blum-Kulka, S., & Olshtain, E. (1984). Requests and apologies. A cross-cultural study of speech act realization patterns (CCSARP). Applied Linguistics, 5(3), 196–213.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bayerische Staatskanzlei. (2004). Ordnung der Zweiten Staatsprüfung für ein Lehramt an öffentlichen Schulen. (Lehramtsprüfungsordnung II – LPO II) Vom 28. Oktober 2004 (GVBl. S. 428). BayRS 2038-3-4-8-11-K. München: Freistaat Bayern.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bayerische Staatskanzlei. (2008). Ordnung der Ersten Prüfung für ein Lehramt an öffentlichen Schulen. (Lehramtsprüfungsordnung I – LPO I) Vom 13. März 2008 (GVBl. S. 180) BayRS 2038-3-4-1-1-K. München: Freistaat Bayern.

    Google Scholar 

  • Browne, E. (1994). Handa’s surprise. London: Walker Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bundeszentrale für politische Bildung. (n.d.). http://www.bpb.de/nachschlagen/lexika/handwoerterbuch-politisches-system/202065/land-freistaat-thueringen. Accessed 10 Oct 2018.

  • Carle, E. (1997). Have you seen my cat? New York: Aladdin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carle, E. (2018). The very hungry caterpillar. London: Puffin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cave, K., & Riddell, C. (2011). Something else. London: Puffin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Destatis: Statistisches Bundesamt. (2018). https://www.destatis.de/DE/PresseService/Presse/Pressemitteilungen/2018/09/PD18_347_12411.html. Accessed 10 Oct 2018.

  • Ervin-Tripp, S. (1976). Is Sybil there? The structure of some American English directives. Language in Society, 5, 25–66.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carrell, P. L., & Konneker, B. H. (1981). Politeness: Comparing native and non-native judgement. Language Learning, 31(1), 17–30. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-1770.1981.tb01370.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Caspari-Grote, K., Grandt, I., Kraaz, U., Neuber, C., Simon, C., & Völtz, I. (2013). Ginger: Pupil’s book 3. Berlin: Cornelsen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Caspari-Grote, K., Grandt, I., Kraaz, U., Neuber, C., Simon, C., & Völtz, I. (2014). Ginger: Pupil’s book 4. Berlin: Cornelsen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Donaldson, J., & Scheffler, A. (2006). The snail and the whale. London: Puffin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Donaldson, J., & Scheffler, A. (2016a). The Grufallo. London: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Donaldson, J., & Scheffler, A. (2016b). The smartest giant in town. London: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Donaldson, J., & Scheffler, A. (2017). Monkey puzzle. London: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Edmondson, W., & House, J. (1981). Let’s talk and talk about it. München: Urban und Schwarzenberg.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ehlers, G., Kahstein, G., Muth, M., & Tait, H. (2013). Bumblebee: Textbook 3. Braunschweig: Schroedel Westermann.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ehlers, G., Michailow-Drews, U., Tait, H., Schönau, M., Van Montague, A., & Zeich-Pelsis, A. (2017). Bumblebee: Textbook 4. Braunschweig: Schroedel Westermann.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freistaat Thüringen. (n.d.). https://www.thueringen.de/th2/schulaemter/. Accessed 5 May 2018.

  • Garland, S. (2012). Azzi in between. London: Frances Lincoln.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gerngross, G., Puchta, H., & Becker, C. (2013a). Playway 3: Pupil’s book. Stuttgart: Ernst Klett Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gerngross, G., Puchta, H., & Becker, C. (2013b). Playway 4: Pupil’s book. Stuttgart: Ernst Klett Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • House, J. (1982). Opening and closing phases in English and German dialogues. Grazer Linguistische Studien, 16, 52–82.

    Google Scholar 

  • House, J., & Kasper, G. (1987). Interlanguage pragmatics. Requesting in a foreign language. In W. Lörscher & R. Schulze (Eds.), Perspectives on language in performance (Vol. 2, pp. 1250–1288). Tübingen: Narr.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koike, D. A. (1995). Transfer of pragmatic competence and suggestions in Spanish foreign language learning. In S. M. Gass & J. Neu (Eds.), Speech acts across cultures (pp. 257–284). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leech, G. (1999). The distribution and function of vocatives in American and British English conversation. In H. Hasselgard and S. Oksefjell (Eds.), Out of corpora: Studies in Honour of Stig Johansson (pp. 107–120). Amsterdam: Rodopi.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leech, G. (2014). The pragmatics of politeness. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Leonni, L. (2011). Frederick. New York: Dragonfly.

    Google Scholar 

  • London, J., & Remkiewicz, F. (1994). Froggy gets dressed. London: Puffin.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacMillan. (2007). MacMillan English dictionary for advanced learners. Oxford: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin, B. J., & Carle, E. (2007). Brown bear, brown bear, what do you see? New York: Henry Holt.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martínez Flor, A. (2005). A theoretical review of the speech act of suggesting: Towards a taxonomy for its use in FLT. Revista Alicantina de Estudios Ingleses, 18, 167–187. https://doi.org/10.14198/raei.2005.18.08.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martínez Flor, A. (2010). Suggestions: How social norms affect pragmatic behaviour. In A. M. Flor & E. U. Juan (Eds.), Speech act performance: Theoretical, empirical and methodological issues (pp. 257–274). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • McKee, D. (1989). Elmer. London: Andersen Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • n.a. (2007). Macmillan English Dictionary for advanced learners. Oxford: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • OED Online, Oxford University Press. (n.d.). www.oed.com/view/Entry/230945. Accessed 11 Aug 2018.

  • Rosen, M., & Langley, J. (2003). Snore. London: Harper Collins.

    Google Scholar 

  • Safont, J., & Pilar, M. (2008). The speech act of requesting. In E. A. Soler (Ed.), Learning how to request in an instructed language language context (pp. 41–64). Bern: Peter Lang.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schauer, G. A., & Adolphs, S. (2006). Expressions of gratitude in corpus and DCT data: Vocabulary, formulaic sequences, and pedagogy. System, 34(1), 119–134. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2005.09.003.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schneider, K. P. (2005). No problem, you’re welcome, anytime: Responding to thanks in Ireland, England and the United States. In A. Barron & K. P. Schneider (Eds.), The pragmatics of Irish English (pp. 101–140). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt, R. W., & Richards, J. (1980). Speech acts and second language learning. Applied Linguistics, 1(2), 129–157.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sendak, M. (1991). Where the wild things are. New York: Harper Collins.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sekretariat der Ständigen Konferenz der Kultusminister der Länder in der Bundesrepublik Deutschland. (2005). Entwicklungen in den Bachelor- und Masterstudiengängen seit Einführung der neuen Studiengangstruktur 1999–2003. Bonn: Sekretariat der Kultusministerkonferenz.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seuss, D. (1985). The cat in the hat. New York: Random House.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sharratt, N. (2006). Ketchup on your cornflakes? London: Scholastic.

    Google Scholar 

  • Statistische Ämter des Bundes und der Länder: Gemeinsames Statistikportal. (n.d.). https://www.statistikportal.de/de/bevoelkerung/flaeche-und-bevoelkerung. Accessed 1 Nov 2018.

  • Stoll Walsh, E. (1989). Mouse paint. Boston: HMH.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomas, V., & Paul, K. (2016a). Winnie and Wilbur in winter. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomas, V., & Paul, K. (2016b). Winnie and Wilbur: Winnie the witch. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thüringer Schulämter. (n.d.). https://www.thueringen.de/th2/schulaemter/. Accessed 10 May 2018.

  • Thüringer Ministerium für Bildung, Wissenschaft und Kultur. (2010). Lehrplan für die Grundschule und für die Förderschule mit dem Bildungsgang der Grundschule: Fremdsprache. Erfurt: Thüringer Ministerium für Bildung, Wissenschaft und Kultur.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thüringer Ministerium für Bildung, Jugend und Sport. (2015). Thüringer Schulordnung. Erfurt: Thüringer Ministerium für Bildung, Jugend und Sport.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thüringer Schulgesetz Thüringer Schulgesetz (ThürSchulG) in der Fassung der Bekanntmachung vom 30. April 2003. http://landesrecht.thueringen.de/jportal/portal/t/bfy/page/bsthueprod.psml/action/portlets.jw.MainAction?p1=m&eventSubmit_doNavigate=searchInSubtreeTOC&showdoccase=1&doc.hl=0&doc.id=jlr-SchulGTH2003pP18&doc.part=S&toc.poskey=#focuspoint. Accessed 1 Nov 2018.

  • Trosborg, A. (1994). Interlanguage pragmatics. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.

    Google Scholar 

  • Umfrage Online. (n.d.). https://www.umfrageonline.com/. Accessed 2 Feb 2017.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Appendix

Appendix

3.1.1 A. Written Task Completed by the Young L2 Learners

W1. Match the words and the pictures

The words dog, cat, horse, pencil, ruler, and glue stick are surrounded by phrases that read, image of dog, cat, horse, pencil, ruler, and glue stick.

W2. Find the matching words

Two tables of nine different words like summer, black, school, hello, red, goodbye, house, please, and thank you are depicted.

W3. Complete

An image of a chat between a boy and a girl. Chat reads, hello, how are you? I am fine. Can I have the ruler, please?

3.1.2 B. Spoken Task Completed by the Young L2 Learners

Function

Interviewer

Pupil

Pragmatics

Good morning.

 

What’s your name?

 

How are you?

 

How old are you?

 

Do you like English?

 

Function

Interviewer

Pupil

Colours and Numbers

Show different picture cards.

 
 

Red

 

1

 

Blue

 

5

 

Yellow

 

Orange

 

7

 

Can you count from 1 to 10, please?

 
 

What is your favourite colour?

 

Function

Interviewer

Pupil

TPR

Touch your nose.

 
 

Clap your hands.

 

Stamp your feet.

 

Touch your chair.

 

Stand up.

 

Turn around.

 

Jump.

 

Sit down.

Function

Interviewer

Pupil

Translation

Can you tell me the English words, please.

 
 

Bruder

 

Schwester

 

Haus

 

Bitte

 

Danke

 

Hund

 

Katze

 

Buch

 

Guten Tag

 

Gute Nacht

 

Weihnachtsmann

 

Mutter

 

Vater

 

Löwe

 

Montag

 

Hallo

 

Guten Morgen

Function

Interviewer

Pupil

Conversation

Can you give me the ruler, please?

 
 

Thank you.

 

Can you give me the rubber, please?

 
 

Thank you.

 

Can you ask for this?

 
 

(Child should formulate a request and use please)

 

Can I have the pencil, please?

 
 

Thank you.

 

Can I have the felt tip, please?

 
 

Thank you.

 

Can you ask for this?

 
 

(Child should formulate a request and use please)

Function

Interviewer

Pupil

Favourite word & goodbye

Which favourite words do you know in English?

 

Thank you for the interview. (Pause – give the pupil the chance to reply to the expression of gratitude)

 

Good bye.

 

3.1.3 C. Questions in the Teacher’s Survey

Part

Question

Format

Items

1

1.1) How important do you consider the following lesson components to be?

MC

10

 

1.2a) Do you assess your learners?

YN

1

 

1.2b) If so, how?

O

1

 

1.3) How important do you consider the following skills, knowledge and competences to be?

MC

7

 

1.4) How frequently have you taught the features in 1.3 in the last teaching unit?

MC

7

 

1.5a) What classroom activities /learner groupings do you use in your English lessons?

MC

5

 

1.5b) If you use forms not listed here, which ones are they?

O

1

 

1.6) How frequently have you used these activities/groupings in the last unit you taught?

MC

4

2

2.1) How important do you consider the teaching of politeness forms to be?

SC

1

 

2.2) How often do you teach your pupils the following expressions? Consider the last unit you were teaching. How frequently have you – the teacher – used these expressions?

MC

17

 

2.3) How often have your pupils used the following expressions in your last unit?

MC

17

 

2.4) Do you use a welcome ritual?

YN

1

 

2.5a) If so, which one?

SC

1

 

2.5b) Please briefly describe the welcome ritual you use.

O

1

 

2.6) Do you use a goodbye ritual?

YN

1

 

2.7a) If so, which one?

SC

1

 

2.7b) Please briefly describe the goodbye ritual you use.

O

1

3

3.1) Do you use differentiation in your English lessons?

SC

1

 

3.2) If so, which forms of differentiation do you use?

MC

8

 

3.3a) Does the textbook that you use include differentiation options?

SC

1

 

3.3b) If so, which ones?

O

1

4

4.1) Do you have special needs students in your classes?

SC

1

 

4.2) Which opportunities for special needs teaching do you see in English lessons?

O

1

 

4.3a) Does the textbook that you use offer sufficient options for special needs learners?

SC

1

 

4.3b) If so, please describe the options here.

O

1

5

5.1) Do you set homework in your English lessons?

YN

1

 

5.2) If so, how often do you set homework?

SC

1

 

5.3) If so, what kind of homework tasks do you set?

MC

6

6

6.1a) Which textbook do you use in your English lessons?

SC

1

 

6.1b) Edition of the textbook

O

1

 

6.1c) Year of publication

O

1

 

6.2) How satisfied are you with the textbook that you use?

SC

1

 

6.3) Do you use supplementary material recommended by the publishing house?

MC

6

 

6.4) How happy are you with the supplementary material offered by the publishing house?

SC

1

 

6.5) Do you use additional material that is publicly available (e.g. children’s books, materials available on the internet) or do you design your own materials?

MC

4

 

6.6) Do you use realia?

YN

1

 

6.7) Do you use or would you like to use one of the following children’s books?

MC

15

 

6.8) Which other children’s books have you already used?

O

1

 

6.9) Do you use children’s songs in your lessons?

YN+

1

7

7.1) Your age

SC

1

 

7.2) Your gender

SC

1

 

7.3) How many years have you been teaching English?

SC

1

 

7.4) Which degrees do you have?

MC

7

 

7.5) Which subjects did you study at university?

O

1

 

7.6) Which schools are you qualified to teach at?

MC

6

 

7.7) Which qualifications do you have for teaching English?

O

1

 

7.8) From which grade is English taught at your school?

O

1

 

7.9) How many hours of English lessons do children at your school have?

O

4

 

7.10) Is there a sufficient number of English teachers at your school?

SC

1

 

7.11) Do you teach English at more than one primary school?

SC

1

 

7.12) What is the average class size in your English classes?

O

1

 

7.13) In which school district do you work?

O

1

8

8.1) Do you have any comments on the questionnaire?

O

1

 

8.2) Do you have any recommendations on how English lessons in primary schools could be improved?

O

1

9

9.1) Would you or your school be interested in taking part in a study involving your pupils?

YN

1

 

9.2) If so, at which school do you work?

O

1

  1. Notes: MC (Multiple Choice), O (Open question), SC (single choice) Y/N (Yes or No question), YN+ (yes and no question, where in the case of yes, a textbook is added to allow the teacher to specify what they are doing); Items here refers to the overall number of items listed that the teachers were asked to provide answers for, e.g. in Question 1.1 the teachers were asked to evaluate 10 phases of the lesson and evaluate their importance on an 5 part Likert scale ranging from very important to not at all important

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Schauer, G.A. (2019). Methodology. In: Teaching and Learning English in the Primary School. English Language Education, vol 18. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-23257-3_3

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-23257-3_3

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-23256-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-23257-3

  • eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics