Skip to main content

Managing Conflict When There’s Disagreement in Care Between Medical Providers, Caregivers, and Patient

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Ethical Issues in Pediatric Hematology/Oncology

Abstract

The medical care of children with life-threatening and life-limiting illness is a crucible containing many volatile issues and complicated circumstances that predictably provoke conflict between well-meaning people. This chapter will review the prototypical types of conflicts that occur in the practice of pediatric hematology/oncology and propose methods of managing these conflicts that hinge on established ethical principles and disciplined reasoning. We draw on the broader field of conflict management for an empirically grounded understanding of conflict and conflict resolution strategies.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Johnson DW. Constructive controversy: theory, research, practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2015.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Wall JA. Conflict and its management. J Manag. 1995;21(5):515–58.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Deutsch MA. A theory of co-operation and competition. Hum Relat. 1949;2(2):129–52.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Studdert DM, Burns JP, Mello MM, Puopolo AL, Truog RD, Brennan TA. Nature of conflict in the care of pediatric intensive care patients with prolonged stay. Pediatrics. 2003;112(3 Pt 1):553–8.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Azoulay E, Timsit JF, Sprung CL, et al. Prevalence and factors of intensive care unit conflicts: the conflicus study. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2009;180(9):853–60.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Stricker KH, Kimberger O, Schmidlin K, Zwahlen M, Mohr U, Rothen HU. Family satisfaction in the intensive care unit: what makes the difference? Intensive Care Med. 2009;35(12):2051–9.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Davidson JE, Powers K, Hedayat KM, et al. Clinical practice guidelines for support of the family in the patient-centered intensive care unit: American College of Critical Care Medicine Task Force 2004-2005. Crit Care Med. 2007;35(2):605–22.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Mercurio MR, Adam MB, Forman EN, Ladd RE, Ross LF, Silber TJ. American Academy of Pediatrics policy statements on bioethics: summaries and commentaries: part 1. Pediatr Rev. 2008;29(1):e1–8.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Kon AA. The shared decision-making continuum. JAMA. 2010;304(8):903–4.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Committee on Bioethics, American Academy of Pediatrics. Informed consent, parental permission, and assent in pediatric practice. Pediatrics. 1995;95(2):314–7.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Lansdown G, Waterston T, Baum D. Implementing the UN convention on the rights of the child. BMJ. 1996;313(7072):1565–6.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Malek J. What really is in a child’s best interest? Toward a more precise picture of the interests of children. J Clin Ethics. 2009;20(2):175–82.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Fasser C, McGuire A, Erdman K, Nadalo D, Scott S, Waters V. The ethics workup: a case-based approach to ethical decision-making instruction. J Physician Assist Educ. 2007;18(1):34–41.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Hanson MJ, Callahan D. The goals of medicine: the forgotten issues in health care reform. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press; 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Sorta-Bilajac I, Pessini L, Dobrila-Dintinjana R, Hozo I. Dysthanasia: the (il)legitimacy of artificially posponed death. Med Arh. 2005;59(3):199–202.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Kehl KA. Moving toward peace: an analysis of the concept of a good death. Am J Hosp Palliat Care. 2006;23(4):277–86.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Weaver MS, Heinze KE, Bell CJ, et al. Establishing psychosocial palliative care standards for children and adolescents with cancer and their families: an integrative review. Palliat Med. 2016;30(3):212–23.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Kirch R, Reaman G, Feudtner C, et al. Advancing a comprehensive cancer care agenda for children and their families: Institute of Medicine Workshop highlights and next steps. CA Cancer J Clin. 2016;66(5):398–407.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Liberati EG, Gorli M, Scaratti G. Invisible walls within multidisciplinary teams: disciplinary boundaries and their effects on integrated care. Soc Sci Med. 2016;150:31–9.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Hysong SJ, Knox MK, Haidet P. Examining clinical performance feedback in Patient-Aligned Care Teams. J Gen Intern Med. 2014;29(Suppl 2):S667–74.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Bruce CR, Miller SM, Zimmerman JL. A qualitative study exploring moral distress in the ICU team: the importance of unit functionality and intrateam dynamics. Crit Care Med. 2015;43(4):823–31.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. American Society for Bioethics and Humanities. A case-based study guide for addressing patient-centered ethical issues in health care. Chicago: American Society for Bioethics and Humanities; 2017.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Whitney SN, Ethier AM, Frugé E, Berg S, McCullough LB, Hockenberry M. Decision making in pediatric oncology: who should take the lead? The decisional priority in pediatric oncology model. J Clin Oncol. 2006;24(1):160–5.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Rosenberg AR, Feudtner C. What else are you hoping for? Fostering hope in paediatric serious illness. Acta Paediatr. 2016;105(9):1004–5.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Bosslet GT, Pope TM, Rubenfeld GD, et al. An official ATS/AACN/ACCP/ESICM/SCCM policy statement: responding to requests for potentially inappropriate treatments in intensive care units. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2015;191(11):1318–30.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Anderson EE. What we talk about when we talk about goals. Virtual Mentor. 2007;9(6):407–9.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Prentice T, Janvier A, Gillam L, Davis PG. Moral distress within neonatal and paediatric intensive care units: a systematic review. Arch Dis Child. 2016;101(8):701–8.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Piers RD, Azoulay E, Ricou B, et al. Perceptions of appropriateness of care among European and Israeli intensive care unit nurses and physicians. JAMA. 2011;306(24):2694–703.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Freedman B. Equipoise and the ethics of clinical research. N Engl J Med. 1987;317(3):141–5.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Nancarrow SA, Booth A, Ariss S, Smith T, Enderby P, Roots A. Ten principles of good interdisciplinary team work. Hum Resour Health. 2013;11:19.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  31. Global Forum on Innovation in Health Professional Education; Board on Global Health; Institute of Medicine. Establishing transdisciplinary professionalism for improving health outcomes: workshop summary. Washington, DC: National Academies Press; 2014.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Reese JJ. Assertion practices and beliefs among nurses and physicians on an inpatient pediatric medical unit. Hosp Pediatr. 2016;6(5):275–81.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Janss R. What is happening under the surface? Power, conflict and the performance of medical teams. Med Educ. 2012;46(9):838–49.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Myers GG. A cross-hospital exploration of nurses’ experiences with horizontal violence. J Nurs Manag. 2016;24(5):624–33.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Parker KM. Creating a nurse-led culture to minimize horizontal violence in the acute care setting: a multi-interventional approach. J Nurses Prof Dev. 2016;32(2):56–63.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Sulmasy LS, Bledsoe TA. American College of Physicians Ethics Manual: Seventh Edition. Ann Intern Med. 2019;170(2 Supplement):S1–S32.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Payne C, Farrell K. Balancing ethical uncertainty: the dance of interprofessional roles. Hosp Top. 2015;93(4):77–83.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Fallat ME, Glover J. Professionalism in pediatrics: statement of principles. Pediatrics. 2007;120(4):895–7.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Berwick D, Hiatt H, Janeway P, Smith R. An ethical code for everybody in health care. BMJ. 1997;315(7123):1633–4.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  40. Joynes VCT. Defining and understanding the relationship between professional identity and interprofessional responsibility: implications for educating health and social care students. Adv Health Sci Educ. 2018;23(1):133–49.

    Google Scholar 

  41. Bartholdson C, Lützén K, Blomgren K, Pergert P. Clarifying perspectives: ethics case reflection sessions in childhood cancer care. Nurs Ethics. 2015;23(4):421–31.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Pollard CL. What is the right thing to do: use of a relational ethic framework to guide clinical decision-making. Int J Caring Sci. 2015;8(2):362–8.

    Google Scholar 

  43. Rasoal DD. What healthcare teams find ethically difficult. Nurs Ethics. 2016;23(8):825–37.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Carnevale FA. The birth of tragedy in pediatrics: a phronetic conception of bioethics. Nurs Ethics. 2007;14(5):571–82.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Beauchamp TL, Childress JF. Principles of biomedical ethics. 5th ed. New York: Oxford University Press; 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  46. Kim WS. Nurses’ perceptions of conflict as constructive or destructive. J Adv Nurs. 2015;71(9):2073–83.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Overton AR, Lowry AC. Conflict management: difficult conversations with difficult people. Clin Colon Rectal Surg. 2013;26(4):259–64.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  48. Egues AL. The bully within and without: strategies to address horizontal violence in nursing. Nurs Forum. 2013;48(3):185–90.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Purpora CC. Job satisfaction and horizontal violence in hospital staff registered nurses: the mediating role of peer relationships. J Clin Nurs. 2015;24(15–16):2286–94.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Nicotera AM. Communication that builds teams: assessing a nursing conflict intervention. Nurs Adm Q. 2014;38(3):248–60.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Johnson DW, Johnson RT. Creative controversy: intellectual challenge in the classroom. Edina: University of Michigan, Interaction Book Company; 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  52. Johnson DW, Johnson FP. Joining together: group theory and group skills. New York: Pearson, Allyn and Bacon; 2006.

    Google Scholar 

  53. Hellsten M, Frugé E, Loftis L, Berg S, Brackett J. Challenges in inter-professional care coordination. Pediatr Blood Cancer. 2016;63(S3):S1–S321.

    Google Scholar 

  54. Howells A, Frugé E, Lehecka K, McCullough L, Loftis L. Incorporating RP&L methods into professional medical ethics education. In: American Society of Bioethics and Humanities 17th annual meeting. Houston, TX, 22 Oct 2015.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ernest Frugé .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Frugé, E., Sprehe, M., Loftis, L., Brown-Hellsten, M., Bruce, C. (2020). Managing Conflict When There’s Disagreement in Care Between Medical Providers, Caregivers, and Patient. In: Mazur, K., Berg, S. (eds) Ethical Issues in Pediatric Hematology/Oncology . Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-22684-8_4

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-22684-8_4

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-22683-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-22684-8

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics