Skip to main content

Community Structure in Co-authorship Networks: The Case of Italian Statisticians

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Statistical Learning of Complex Data (CLADAG 2017)

Abstract

Community detection is a very appealing topic in network analysis. A precise definition of community is still lacking, so the comparison of different methods is not a simple task. This paper shows exploratory results by adopting two well-known community detection methods and a new proposal to discover groups of scientists in the co-authorship network of Italian academic statisticians.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 119.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. 1.

    The five subfields established by the Italian governmental official classification are: Methodological Statistics, Statistics for Experimental and Technological Research, Economic Statistics, Demography, and Social Statistics.

References

  1. Azzalini, A., Torelli, N.: Clustering via nonparametric density estimation. Stat. Comput. 17(1), 71–80 (2007)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  2. Bellotti, E., Kronegger, L., Guadalupi, L.: The evolution of research collaboration within and across disciplines in Italian academia. Scientometrics 109, 783–811 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Blondel, V.D., Guillaume, J.-L., Lambiotte, R., Lefebvre, E.: Fast unfolding of communities in large networks. J. Stat. Mech. 2008(10), P10008 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Clauset, A., Newman, M.E.J., Moore, C.: Finding community structure in very large networks. Phys. Rev. E 70, 066111 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. De Stefano, D., Zaccarin, S.: Co-authorship networks and scientific performance: an empirical analysis using the generalized extreme value distribution. J. Appl. Stat. 43, 262–279 (2016)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  6. De Stefano, D., Fuccella, V., Vitale, M.P., Zaccarin, S.: The use of different data sources in the analysis of co-authorship networks and scientific performance. Soc. Netw. 35, 370–381 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Doreian, P., Batagelj, V., Ferligoj, A.: Generalized Blockmodeling. Structural Analysis in the Social Sciences. Cambridge University Press, New York (2005)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  8. Ferligoj, A., Kronegger, L., Mali, F., Snijders, T.A.B., Doreian, P.: Scientific collaboration dynamics in a national scientific system. Scientometrics 104, 985–1012 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Fortunato, S., Hric, D.: Community detection in networks: a user guide. Phys. Rep. 659, 1–44 (2016)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  10. Freeman, L.C.: Centrality in social networks conceptual clarification. Soc. Netw. 1, 215–239 (1978)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Fuccella, V., De Stefano, D., Vitale, M.P., Zaccarin, S.: Improving co-authorship network structures by combining multiple data sources: evidence from Italian academic statisticians. Scientometrics 107, 167–184 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Menardi, G., De Stefano, D.: Modal clustering of social network. In: Cabras, S., Di Battista, T., Racugno, W. (eds.) Proceedings of the 47th SIS Scientific Meeting of the Italian Statistical Society. CUEC Editrice, Cagliari (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Newman, M.E.J., Girvan, M.: Finding and evaluating community structure in networks. Phys. Rev. E 69, 026113 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Palla, G., Derényi, I., Farkas, I., Vicsek, T.: Uncovering the overlapping community structure of complex networks in nature and society. Nature 435, 814–818 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Savić, M., Ivanović, M., Radovanović, M., Ognjanović, Z., Pejović, A., Krüger, T.J.: Exploratory analysis of communities in co-authorship networks: a case study. In: ICT Innovations 2014, pp. 55–64. Springer, Berlin (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Schaub, M.T., Delvenne, J.C., Rosvall, M., Lambiotte, R.: The many facets of community detection in complex networks. Appl. Netw. Sci. 2(1), 4 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Zachary, W.W.: An information flow model for conflict and fission in small groups. J. Anthropol. Res. 33(4), 452–473 (1977)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Susanna Zaccarin .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Stefano, D.D., Vitale, M.P., Zaccarin, S. (2019). Community Structure in Co-authorship Networks: The Case of Italian Statisticians. In: Greselin, F., Deldossi, L., Bagnato, L., Vichi, M. (eds) Statistical Learning of Complex Data. CLADAG 2017. Studies in Classification, Data Analysis, and Knowledge Organization. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-21140-0_7

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics