Abstract
Given a background on the general challenges and needs for valid decision making, let us now learn more about the different actors that are involved or impacted by the expertise and decision processes when dealing with risks and resilience.
Conquering the world on horseback is easy. It is dismounting and governing that is hard.—Genghis Khan (c. 1162 – 1227A.D.)
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
General Division in charge of civil protection and emergency management (Direction générale de la Sécurité civile et de la gestion des crises).
- 2.
General Secretary of defense and national safety (Secrétariat général de la défense et de la sécurité nationale).
- 3.
Direction générale de la prévention des risques.
- 4.
Agence de l’environnement et de la maîtrise de l’énergie.
- 5.
Agence nationale de sécurité sanitaire et l’alimentation, de l’environnement et du travail.
- 6.
Institut de radioprotection et de sûreté nucléaire.
- 7.
Centre d’études et d’expertise sur les risques, l’environnement, la mobilité et l’aménagement.
- 8.
Bureau de recherches géologiques et minières
- 9.
Institut national de l’environnement industriel et des risques.
- 10.
There are 22 regions in France. France is devided in departments science Napoleon.
- 11.
Regional divisions of Environment, planning and housing (Directions Régionales de l’Environnement, de l’Aménagement et du Logement).
- 12.
Directions Départementales des Territoires et de la Mer.
- 13.
Directions Départementales de la Protection des Populations.
- 14.
Conseil général de l’environnement et du développement durable (CGEDD).
- 15.
“Bureau d’enquêtes sur les accidents de transport terrestre” (BEA-TT) and “Bureau d’enquêtes et d’analyses pour la sécurité de l’aviation civile” (BEA Aviation civile).
- 16.
Les missions régionales d’autorité environnementale (MRAe).
- 17.
Le Conseil général de l’Alimentation.
- 18.
Le Conseil général de l’Agriculture et des Espaces ruraux.
- 19.
Le Conseil général de l’économie.
- 20.
L’inspection générale de l’Administration
- 21.
L’Inspection générale des Affaires sociales.
- 22.
L’inspection générale des Finances.
- 23.
L’inspection générale des Affaires Maritimes.
- 24.
Nitrous Oxide.
- 25.
See for example the charter signed by the expertise institutions such as IRSN, INERIS, CEMAGREF (IRSTEA), IFSTTAR and ANSES: http://www.irsn.fr/FR/Actualites_presse/Communiques_et_dossiers_de_presse/Pages/20110909_Charte-ouverture-societe_expertise_inter-instituts.aspx
References
Jasanoff, S. (1998). The political science of risk perception. Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 59(1), 91–99.
Mejri O., Pesaro. G. (2015). Knowledge based strategies for disaster risk reduction: a knowledge management framework to increase understanding and awareness of value of prevention and preparedness. Esrel Conference 2015.
Merad, M., Dechy, N., Marcel, F. (2011). Adapting participative governance framework for the implementation of a sustainable development plan within an Organization. Ouvrage collectif coordonné par Karl H.A., Flaxman M., Vargas-Moreno J.C., and Lynn Scarlett P. Restoring and Sustaining Lands: Coordinating Science, Politics, and Action. Springer.
Merad, M., Dechy, N., Llory, M., & Tsoukias, A. (2014). Towards an analytics and an ethics of expertise: Learning from decision-aiding experiences in public risk assessment and risk management. EURO J Decis Process, 2, 63. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40070-013-0022-5.
Palma-Oliveira, J. M., Trump, B. D., Wood, M. D., & Linkov, I. (2018). Community-driven hypothesis testing: A solution for the tragedy of the anticommons. Risk Analysis, 38(3), 620–634.
Slovic.P, Fischoff B., Lichtenstein S. (1980). Facts and Fears: Understanding Perceived Risks. Society of Risk Assessments: How safe is Safe enough? Plenum Press, New York.
Trump, B. D., Kadenic, M., & Linkov, I. (2018). A sustainable Arctic: Making hard decisions. Arctic, Antarctic, and Alpine Research, 50(1), e1438345.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Merad, M., Trump, B.D. (2020). Actors and Experts in the Decision Making Process. In: Expertise Under Scrutiny. Risk, Systems and Decisions. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-20532-4_3
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-20532-4_3
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-20530-0
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-20532-4
eBook Packages: Earth and Environmental ScienceEarth and Environmental Science (R0)