Abstract
This chapter outlines the methodology that guides the empirical approach of this investigation. The research aim is to understand public policies against prenatal sex selection, their evolution and impact on sex ratio imbalances in selected Asian countries by providing a qualitative and qualitative assessment. Three countries and three distinct localities within those countries (Northwestern India, Northern Vietnam and Southeastern part of South Korea) were chosen to serve as case studies for the comparative analysis. This chapter first describes the research methodology used for comparing systems of great diversity making use of the Most Different Systems Design (MDSD). It then highlights the country selection criteria and describes the qualitative and quantitative data that has been employed throughout the investigation. The qualitative data draws from policy files, over 100 key informant interviews, and participant observation during political rallies, which was gathered during field research in South Korea, India and Vietnam. The quantitative analysis is based on secondary demographic data obtained from the national statistic bureaus in the three countries to assess policy impact via a difference-in-difference analysis comparing pre-and post intervention periods in target and control areas. The chapter also describes the research sites, data analysis, data quality and comparability before closing with a short summary.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
This can be seen in the increasing number of scientific journals, platforms and conferences on the topic, e.g. Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis and the affiliated International Comparative Policy Analysis Forum; International Conference on Public Policy, etc.
- 2.
Darnovsky (2009) provided a non-exhaustive list of the number of countries in the world that have issued laws or policies to prohibit sex selection, listing 36 countries, but there are more. E.g Nepal, Vietnam, and South Korea were not included in the list.
- 3.
John Stuart Mill wrote A System of Logic in 1843. Mill’s reasoning was as followed: In one setting, “A B C D occur together with w x y z. [In another setting,] A E F G occur together with w t u v. Therefore A is the cause, or the effect, of w” (Mill 1843, p. 454).
- 4.
Often a false equivalence between quantitative research and objectivism, and qualitative research and subjectivism is created. In fact, both are scientific methods to test reality, while both methods also depend on human interpretation. The combination of qualitative and quantitative methods is especially fruitful in social and political science, where any one discipline falls short in adequately conceptualizing and understanding reality (de Roche & de Roche, 2010).
- 5.
CPA is a tool to analyze (SRB) trends and identify statistically significant changes (called breakpoints or change points) that occur in a time series.
- 6.
E.g. field research in Gurugram was added because of the involvement of Center For Social Research there. In Korea, I expanded the circle of people I interviewed due a shortage of key informants from government cadres and IOs.
References
Anckar, C. (2008). On the Applicability of the Most Similar Systems Design and the Most Different Systems Design in Comparative Research. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 11(5), 389–401.
Bassett, B. R. (2010). Computer-based analysis of qualitative data: NVIVO. In A. Mills, G. Durepos, & E. Wiebe (Eds.), Encyclopedia of Case Study Research (pp. 192–194). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
CIA. (2017). The World Factbook. Retrieved March 9, 2017, from https://www.cia.gov/library/publications/the-world-factbook/
Collier, D. (1993). The comparative method. In A. W. Finifter (Ed.), Political science: The state of the discipline II (pp. 105–119). Washington: American Political Science Association.
Darnovsky, M. (2009). Countries with laws or policies on sex selection (p. 7). Presented at the New York City Sex Selection Meeting, New York: Center for Genertics and Society. Retrieved July 22, 2016, from http://geneticsandsociety.org/downloads/200904_sex_selection_memo.pdf
de Roche, J., & de Roche, C. (2010). Objectivism. In A. Mills, G. Durepos, & E. Wiebe (Eds.), Encyclopedia of case study research (p. 625). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
Election Commission of India. (2016). Notification No.56/2016/PPS-III on recognised National and State Parties. New Delhi, India: Election Commission of India.
Elger, T. (2010). Limited-depth case study. In A. Mills, G. Durepos, & E. Wiebe (Eds.), Encyclopedia of case study research (pp. 530–532). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
Encyclopedia Britannica. (2017). South Korea. Culture, History, and People. Retrieved May 31, 2017, from https://global.britannica.com/place/South-Korea
Engeli, I., & Allison, C. R. (Eds.). (2014). Comparative policy studies. London, UK: Palgrave Macmillan UK.
Guilmoto, C. Z., Dudwick, N., Gjonça, A., & Rahm, L. (2018). How do demographic trends change? The onset of birth masculinization in Albania, Georgia, and Vietnam 1990–2005. Population and Development Review, 44(1), 37–61.
Hanoi School of Public Health. (2012). Vietnam country report. Health system stewardship in Vietnam, India and China (HESVIC) (p. 262). Hanoi: Hanoi School of Public Health. Retrieved July 27, 2016, from http://cordis.europa.eu/project/rcn/91234_en.html
Immergut, E. M. (1990). Institutions, veto points, and policy results: A comparative analysis of health care. Journal of Public Policy, 10(04), 391.
Kim, D.-S. (2004). Missing girls in South Korea: Trends, levels and regional variations. Population, 59(6), 865–878.
Lasswell, H. D. (1968). The future of the comparative method. Comparative Politics, 1(1), 3.
Lijphart, A. (1971). Comparative politics and the comparative method. The American Political Science Review, 65(3), 682.
Lodge, M. (2007). Comparative public policy. In F. Fischer, G. J. Miller, & M. S. Sidney (Eds.), Handbook of public policy analysis: theory, politics, and methods (pp. 273–288). Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.
Loenzien, M. d. (2006). Fondements des Approches Qualitatives Dans les Études des Population. In M. de Loenzien & S.-D. Yana (Eds.), Les Approches Qualitatives Dans les Études de Population. Théorie et Pratique (pp. 11–45). Paris, France: Contemporary Publishing International.
Mack, N., Woodsong, C., MacQueen, K., Guest, G., & Namey, E. (2005). Qualitative research methods: A data collector’s field guide. North Carolina: Family Health International USAID.
Mahoney, C. (2007). Lobbying success in the United States and the European Union. Journal of Public Policy, 27(01), 35.
Mekong Economics Ltd. (2013). 2012 Baseline study on Sex Ratio at Birth in Hai Duong Province (p. 110). Hai Duong. Retrieved August 16, 2015, from http://www.mekongeconomics.com/dev/images/stories/pds/J0886.pdf
Mill, J. S. (1843). A System of Logic, Ratiocinative and Inductive. (Vol. 1). London, UK: Harrison and Co.
Molloy, A. (2010). Case study research in public policy. In A. Mills, G. Durepos, & E. Wiebe (Eds.), Encyclopedia of case study research (pp. 117–120). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
Peters, G. (2013). Strategies for comparative research in political science. London, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.
Population Council, & CREHPA. (2015). Gender-baised sex selection and unbalanced sex ratios at Birth in South Asia: Case studies of the situation and promising approaches (p. 122). New Delhi, India: Population Council.
Przeworski, A., & Teune, H. (1970). The Logic of Comparative Social Inquiry. New York, NY: Wiley and Sons.
Rose, R. (1991). What is lesson-drawing? Journal of Public Policy, 11(01), 3.
Skocpol, T. (1979). States and social revolutions: A comparative analysis of France, Russia and China. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
WHO. (2011). Preventing gender-biased sex selection: An interagency statement OHCHR, UNFPA, UNICEF, UN Women and WHO. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization.
Yang, H. (2008). A journal of family law reform in Korea: Tradition, equality, and social change. Journal of Korean Law, 8, 77.
Yin, R. K. (2014). Case study research: Design and methods (5th ed.). Los Angeles, CA: Sage.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Annex 1: Event calendar. Field research in Vietnam, India and South Korea, October 2014 – April 2015
Annex 1: Event calendar. Field research in Vietnam, India and South Korea, October 2014 – April 2015
Country/Hosts | Dates | Activities |
Vietnam Institute for Population and Social Studies | 03.10.14 | Participation in talk show & arts performance on SRB imbalance, UNFPA and DOPFP of Hai Duong Province, Hai Duong City. |
09.10.14 | Dissemination workshop on the joint program between MOLISA & MOH on “Promoting gender equality to address SRB imbalance,” Hanoi. | |
21.10.14 | Conduction of interviews during communication event on SRB imbalances, UNFPA, MOLISA, VFU, VWU, GOPFP-MOH, Hanoi. | |
07.11.14 | Participation in “Sharing International & National Experience in Harnessing Opportunities from Demographic Changes for Socio-Economic Development and Implications for Vietnam,” UNFPA, Vinh Yen City. | |
11.11.14 | Participation in the 2nd National Conference on Sexual and Reproductive Health, UNFPA, Hanoi. | |
12.–13.11.14 | Field research in Ninh Binh Province during training for service providers, UNFPA, GOPFP-MOH, DOPFP of Hai Duong Province, Nin Binh City. | |
24.–25.11.14 | Field research in Hai Duong and interviews with medical personnel, facilitated by UNFPA Vietnam, Hai Duong City. | |
India Heinrich Böll Foundation, Center for Social Research | 24.12.14 | Participation in “My Strength, My Daughter: Symposium on PC&PNDT Act,” CSR funded by German Embassy, Gurugram. |
6.–12.01.15 | Field research in Maharashtra facilitated by Prof. T.V. Sekher, International Institute for Population Sciences, Mumbai and Pune. | |
13.–18.01.15 | Field research in Punjab and Haryana facilitated by Parminder Singh, Civil Servant, Chandigarh, Patiala and Shaheed Bhagat Singh Nagar. | |
11.02.15 | Field research in Haryana facilitated by CSR and district officials, Gurugram. | |
16.02.15 | Participation in Indian Women Press Conference on “Implement Supreme Court Ruling – Banning Online Sex-determination Ads”, New Delhi. | |
South Korea Seoul National University | 26.02.15 | Meeting with Dr. Nam-Hoon Cho, Senior Government Advisor, KIHASA Research Fellow, and key informant on Korean population policies, Seoul. |
04.03.15 | Field visits to private clinics and public hospitals to interview medical personnel, Seoul. | |
06.03.15 | Meeting with Heeran Chun, Demographer at Jungwon University and researcher on sex selection in South Korea, Goesan. | |
08.03.15 | Participation and conduction of interviews during International Women’s Day, Award Ceremony, Korean Women’s Association United, Seoul. | |
19.03.–05.04.15 | Field research in North/South Gyeongsang, facilitated by Planned Parenthood Federation of Korea (PPFK), Daegu and Busan. |
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Rahm, L. (2020). Methodology. In: Gender-Biased Sex Selection in South Korea, India and Vietnam. Demographic Transformation and Socio-Economic Development, vol 11. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-20234-7_4
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-20234-7_4
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-20233-0
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-20234-7
eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)