Skip to main content

Computer Tomography Tube Voltage and Phantom Dimensions Influence on the Number of Hounsfield Units

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
CMBEBIH 2019 (CMBEBIH 2019)

Part of the book series: IFMBE Proceedings ((IFMBE,volume 73))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

Hounsfield units (HU) are a dimensionless units universally used in computed tomography (CT) scanning to express CT numbers in a standardized and convenient form. Calibration curve (CC) implemented in radiotherapy treatment planning system (TPS) shows the dependence of HU on relative electron density (RED). Radiotherapy treatment planning process is based on data from the CC and linear accelerator (Linac) data set. RED is constant and specified for each material, but the HU can change depending on several factors. Dosimetric phantom in radiotherapy properly represents human anatomy and enable thorough analysis of both the imaging and dosimetry system. For the purpose of CC checking, two phantoms were used: Catphan 504 (The Phantom Laboratory) and CIRS 062MA (Computerized Imaging reference Systems, Inc.). The aim of the paper was to check whether the HU depends on the dimensions of the phantom. Catphan 504 phantom was scanned first, in order to verify the HU determination methodology. After that, CIRS 062MA phantom representing both abdomen and head configuration was scanned. By analyzing Catphan 504 phantom obtained scanning results, it was concluded that the HU values are correctly determined, since the results are in accordance with the manufacturer’s recommendations. Based on results of CIRS 062MA phantom scan, the HU dependence on the CT simulator tube voltage was confirmed. Significant difference in HU for high density materials (up to 135 HU) due to different phantom sizes was observed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Garcia-Ramirez, J.L., et al.: Performance evaluation of an 85-cm-bore X-ray computed tomography scanner designed for radiation oncology and comparison with current diagnostic CT scanners. Radiat. Oncol. Biol. Phys. 52, 1123–1131 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Khan, F.M., Gibbons, J.P.: Treatment Planning in Radiation Oncology. Wolters Kluwer, Philadelphia, USA (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Hoffer M.: CT Teaching Manual. Georg Thieme Verlag (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Fosbinder, R., Orth, D.: Essentials of Radiologic Science. Wolters Kluwer, Philadelphia, USA (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Bushberg, J.T., Boone, J.M.: The Essential Physics of Medical Imaging. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Philadelphia, USA (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Cann, C.E.: Quantitative CT applications: comparison of current scanners. Radiology 162, 257–261 (1987)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. McKetty M.H.: The AAPM/RSNA physics tutorial for residents. Radiographics 18, 151–163 (1998)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Birnbaum, B.A., et al.: Multi-detector row CT attenuation measurements: assessment of intra- and interscanner variability with an anthropomorphic body CT phantom. Radiology 242, 109–119 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Gulliskrud, K.: How to measure CT image quality: Variations in CT-numbers, uniformity and low contrast resolution for a CT quality assurance phantom. Physica Medica 30, 521–526 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. The Phantom Laboratory: Catphan 504 Manual. Salem, NY (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  11. CIRS Product Guide—CBCT Electron Density & Image Quality Phantom System: Model 062M, 062MA & 062MQA. Norfolk, Virginia (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Skaug Sande, E.P., et al.: Interphantom and interscanner variations for HU—establishment of reference values for HU in a commercial QA phantom. Phys. Med. Biol. 55, 5123 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflict of Interest

None declared.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Tatjana Ignjic .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Ignjic, T., Pavicar, B., Kolarevic, G., Ranogajec, Z. (2020). Computer Tomography Tube Voltage and Phantom Dimensions Influence on the Number of Hounsfield Units. In: Badnjevic, A., Škrbić, R., Gurbeta Pokvić, L. (eds) CMBEBIH 2019. CMBEBIH 2019. IFMBE Proceedings, vol 73. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-17971-7_17

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-17971-7_17

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-17970-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-17971-7

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics