Abstract
The function of latrines is still debated in many mammals, and in most cases latrine use is likely multi-functional. Functional hypotheses can be broadly divided into five categories that are not all mutually exclusive: resource defence, information centre/advertisement, landmarks/orientation, parasite control, or predator–prey interactions. To standardise all investigations into latrine function across species, we present a hypothesis-driven research framework based on the following five key categories of data that can, and we argue should, be collected from latrines: (1) spatial distribution patterns; (2) temporal usage patterns; (3) individual visitation and contribution patterns (to individual latrines); (4) behaviour of visitors; and (5) scent signal content and longevity. We suggest that our proposed approach offers a much-needed standardised structure to guide investigation into the function of latrine use in mammals.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Ali HAM, Mayes RW, Lamb CS, Hector BL, Verma AK, Ørskov ER (2004) The potential of long-chain fatty alcohols and long-chain fatty acids as diet composition markers: development of methods for quantitative analysis and faecal recoveries of these compounds in sheep fed mixed diets. J Agricul Sci 142(1):71–78
Banks PB, Bytheway JP, Carthey AJ, Hughes NK, Price CJ (2014) Olfaction and predator-prey interactions amongst mammals in Australia. Carniv Aust: Past, Present Futur, 389
Barja I, de Miguel FJ, Bárcena F (2004) The importance of crossroads in faecal marking behaviour of the wolves (Canis lupus). Naturwissenschaften 91:489–492
Brown RE, Macdonald DW (eds) (1985) Social odours in mammals. Clarendon Press, Oxford
Buesching CD, Jordan NR (in press) The function of small carnivore latrines: case studies and a research framework for hypothesis-testing. In: San EDL, Sato JJ, Belant JL, Somers MJ (eds) Small carnivores: evolution, ecology, behaviour & conservation. Wiley Publishing
Buesching CD, Macdonald DW (2001) Scent-marking behaviour of the European badger (Meles meles): resource defence or individual advertisement? In: Chemical signals in vertebrates vol 9. Springer, Boston, MA, pp 321–327
Buesching CD, Stankowitch T (2017) Communication amongst the musteloids: signs, signals, and cues. In: Macdonald DW, Newman C, Harrington LA (eds) Biology and conservation of the musteloids (Badgers, Otters, Skunks, Raccoons and their kin). OUP
Buesching CD, Waterhouse JS, Macdonald DW (2002) Gas-chromatographic analyses of the subcaudal gland secretion of the European badger (Meles meles) part I: chemical differences related to individual parameters. J Chem Ecol 28(1):41–56
Buesching CD, Tinnesand HV, Sin Y, Rosell F, Burke T, Macdonald DW (2016a) Coding of group odor in the subcaudal gland secretion of the European badger Meles meles: chemical composition and pouch microbiota. In: Chemical signals in vertebrates vol 13. Springer, Cham, pp 45–62
Buesching CD, Newman C, Service K, Macdonald DW, Riordan P (2016b) Latrine marking patterns of badgers (Meles meles) with respect to population density and range size. Ecosph 7(5):e01328
Curtis VA (2014) Infection-avoidance behaviour in humans and other animals. Tr Immunol 35(10):457–464
Dawkins R, Krebs JR (1978) Animal signals: information or manipulation? In: Krebs JR, Davies NB (eds) Behavioural ecology: an evolutionary approach. Blackwell, Oxford, pp 282–309
Delahay RJ, Brown JA, Mallinson PJ, Spyvee PD, Handoll D, Rogers LM, Cheeseman CL (2000) The use of marked bait in studies of the territorial organization of the European badger (Meles meles). Mamm Rev 30(2):73–87
Eisenberg JF, Kleiman DG (1972) Olfactory communication in mammals. Ann Rev Ecol Syst 3:1–32
Ellwood SA, Newman C, Montgomery RA, Nicosia V, Buesching CD, Markham A, Mascolo C, Trigoni N, Pasztor B, Dyo V, Latora V (2017) An active-radio-frequency-identification system capable of identifying co-locations and social-structure: validation with a wild free-ranging animal. M Ecol Evol 8(12):1822–1831
Espírito-Santo C, Rosalino LM, Santos-Reis M (2007) Factors affecting the placement of common genet latrine sites in a Mediterranean landscape in Portugal. J Mammal 88:201–207
Fiorelli LE, Ezcurra MD, Hechenleitner EM, Arganaraz E, Taborda JR, Trotteyn MJ, … , Desojo JB (2013) The oldest known communal latrines provide evidence of gregarism in Triassic megaherbivores. Sci Rep 3:3348
Gorman ML, Trowbridge BJ (1989) The role of odor in the social lives of carnivores. In: Gittleman JL (ed) Carnivore behavior, ecology, and evolution, vol 1. Cornell University Press, Ithaca, pp 57–88
Gosling LM (1982) A reassessment of the function of scent marking in territories. Z Tierpsychol 60:89–118
Gosling LM, McKay HV (1990) Competitor assessment by scent matching: an experimental test. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 26:415–420
Gosling LM, Roberts SC (2001) Testing ideas about the function of scent marks in territories from spatial patterns. Anim Behav 62(3):F7–F10
Hammerstein P (1981) The role of asymmetries in animal contests. Anim Behav 29:193–205
Hart BL (1983) Flehmen behavior and vomeronasal organ function. In: Chemical signals in vertebrates vol 3. Springer, Boston, MA, pp 87–103
Hediger H (1949) Säugetier-Territorien und ihre Markierung. Bijdr Tot Dierk 28:172–184
Hirsch BT, Prange S, Hauver SA, Gehrt SD (2014) Patterns of latrine use by raccoons (Procyon lotor) and implications for Bayliscaris procyonis transmission. J Wildl Dis 50:243–249
Hughes NK, Kelley JL, Banks PB (2009) Receiving behaviour is sensitive to risks from eavesdropping predators. Oecologia 160(3):609–617
Hughes NK, Price CJ, Banks PB (2010) Predators are attracted to the olfactory signals of prey. PLoS ONE 5(9):e13114
Irwin MT, Samonds KE, Raharison J-L, Wright PC (2004) Lemur latrines: observations of latrine behavior in wild primates and possible ecological significance. J Mammal 85(3):420–427
Jordan NR (2007) Scent-marking investment is determined by sex and breeding status in meerkats. Anim Behav 74(3):531–540
Jordan NR, Manser MB, Mwanguhya F, Kyabulima S, Rüedi P, Cant MA (2011) Scent marking in wild banded mongooses: 1. Sex-specific scents and overmarking. Anim Behav 81(1):31–42
Kilshaw K, Newman C, Buesching C, Bunyan J, Macdonald D (2009) Coordinated latrine use by European badgers, Meles meles: potential consequences for territory defense. J Mammal 90(5):1188–1198
Krebs JR (1982) Territorial defence in the great tit (Parus major): do residents always win? Behav Ecol Sociobiol 11:185–194
Logiudice K (2001) Latrine foraging strategies of two small mammals: implications for the transmission of Baylisascaris procyonis. Amer Midl Nat 146:369–378
Macdonald DW, Newman C, Buesching CD (2015) Badgers in the rural landscape—conservation paragon or farmland pariah? Lessons from the Wytham Badger Project. In: Macdonald DW & Feber RE (eds) Wildlife conservation on farmland, vol 2: Conflict in the Countryside. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 65–95
Maynard-Smith J, Parker GA (1976) The logic of asymmetric contests. Anim Behav 24:159–175
Mella VS, Cooper CE, Davies SJ (2014) Behavioural responses of free-ranging western grey kangaroos (Macropus fuliginosus) to olfactory cues of historical and recently introduced predators. Austral Ecol 39(1):115–121
Muller-Schwarze D (1987) Evolution of cervid olfactory communication. In: Wemmer CM (ed) Biology and management of the Cervidae, vol 577. Smith Institute Press, Washington, DC, pp 223–234
Page LK, Swihart RK, Kazacos KR (1998) Raccoon latrine structure and its potential role in transmission of Baylisascaris procyonis to vertebrates. Amer Midl Nat 140:180–185
Palme R, Touma C, Arias N, Dominchin MF, Lepschy M (2013) Steroid extraction: get the best out of faecal samples. Wien Tierarztl Monatsschr 100(9–10):238–246
Poduschka W, Wemmer C (1986) Observations on Chemical Communication and its Glandular Sources in Selected Insectivora. In: Duvall D, Müller-Schwarze D, Silverstein RM (eds) Chemical signals in vertebrates vol 4. Springer, Boston, MA
Roberts NM, Crimmins SM, Hamilton DA, Gallagher E (2008) An evaluation of bridge-sign surveys to monitor river otter (Lontra canadensis) populations. Amer Midl Nat 160(2):358–363
Roper TJ (2010) Badger. The New Naturalist Library, Collins, London
Ruibal M, Peakall R, Claridge A (2011) Socio-seasonal changes in scent-marking habits in the carnivorous marsupial Dasyurus maculatus at communal latrines. Austral J Zool 58(5):317–322
Sneddon IA (1991) Latrine use by the European rabbit (Oryctolagus cuniculus). J Mammal 72(4):769–775
Stewart PD, Anderson C, Macdonald DW (1997) A mechanism for passive range exclusion: evidence from the European badger (Meles meles). J Theo Biol 184(3):279–289
Stewart PD, MacDonald DW, Newman C, Tattersall FH (2002) Behavioural mechanisms of information transmission and reception by badgers, Meles meles, at latrines. Anim Behav 63(5):999–1007
Sun L, Müller-Schwarze D (1998) Anal gland secretion codes for relatedness in the beaver. Castor canadensis. Ethol 104(11):917–927
Tinnesand HV, Buesching CD, Noonan MJ, Newman C, Zedrosser A, Rosell F, Macdonald DW (2015) Will trespassers be prosecuted or assessed according to their merits? A consilient interpretation of territoriality in a group-living carnivore, the European Badger (Meles meles). PLoS ONE 10(7):e0132432
Tsunoda M, Kaneko Y, Sako T, Koizumi R, Iwasaki K, Mitsuhashi I, Saito MU, Hisano M, Newman C, Macdonald DW, Buesching CD (2018) Human disturbance affects latrine‐use patterns of raccoon dogs. J Wildl Manag
Weinstein SB, Moura CW, Mendez JF, Lafferty KD (2018) Fear of feces? Tradeoffs between disease risk and foraging drive animal activity around raccoon latrines. Oikos
Wronski T, Plath M (2010) Characterization of the spatial distribution of latrines in reintroduced mountain gazelles: do latrines demarcate female group home ranges? J Zool 280(1):92–101
Zhou Y, Chen W, Buesching CD, Newman C, Kaneko Y, Xiang M, Nie C, Macdonald DW, Xie Z (2015) Hog badger (Arctonyx collaris) latrine use in relation to food abundance: evidence of the scarce factor paradox. Ecosphere 6(1):19
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
Buesching, C.D., Jordan, N. (2019). The Social Function of Latrines: A Hypothesis-Driven Research Approach. In: Buesching, C. (eds) Chemical Signals in Vertebrates 14. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-17616-7_8
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-17616-7_8
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-17615-0
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-17616-7
eBook Packages: Biomedical and Life SciencesBiomedical and Life Sciences (R0)