Skip to main content

Adaptation of the University of Pennsylvania Smell Identification Test for the Population of Central Russia

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Chemical Signals in Vertebrates 14

Abstract

No standardized test is currently used in research or clinical practice in Russia, a country with a total population of ~150 million people. To close this gap, we have tested the original version of the University of Pennsylvania Smell Identification Test (UPSIT) on the population of central Russia including groups of different ages residing in urban areas and in the rural part of the country. Our results demonstrate that the UPSIT is applicable for the evaluation of olfactory function within the population of Central Russia, and allows the detection of age-related differences in human olfactory function. However, several odor samples present within the original UPSIT proved to be unfamiliar to the subjects due to cultural differences. We have therefore tested and identified odor items that may replace poorly recognizable smells of the original UPSIT. Thus, we have developed a culturally adapted version of the UPSIT to be used within the population of the Central Russia.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Altundag A, Tekeli H, Salihoglu M, Cayonu M, Yasar H, Kendirli MT et al (2015) Cross-culturally modified University of Pennsylvania Smell Identification Test for a Turkish population. Am J Rhinol 29:e138–e141

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Amoore J, Ollman B (1983) Practical test kits for quantitatively evaluating the sense of smell. Rhinology 21:49–54

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Aschenbrenner K, Hummel C, Teszmer K, Krone F, Ishimaru T, Seo HS et al (2008) The influence of olfactory loss on dietary behaviors. Laryngoscope 118:135–144

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Djordjevic J, Jones-Gotman M, De Sousa K, Chertkow H (2008) Olfaction in patients with mild cognitive impairment and Alzheimer’s disease. Neurobiol Aging 29:693–706

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Doty RL (1995) The Smell Identification Test™ administration manual. Sensonics. Inc, Philadelphia, PA

    Google Scholar 

  • Doty RL (2007) Olfaction in Parkinson’s disease. Parkinsonism & related disorders 13:S225–S228

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Doty RL, Frye RE, Agrawal U (1989) Internal consistency reliability of the fractionated and whole University of Pennsylvania Smell Identification Test. Percept Psychophys 45:381–384

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Doty RL, Kamath V (2014) The influences of age on olfaction: a review. Front Psychol 5:20

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Doty RL, McKeown DA, Lee WW, Shaman P (1995) A study of the test-retest reliability of ten olfactory tests. Chem Senses 20:645–656

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Doty RL, Reyes PF, Gregor T (1987) Presence of both odor identification and detection deficits in Alzheimer’s disease. Brain Res Bull 18:597–600

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Doty RL, Shaman P, Applebaum SL, Giberson R, Siksorski L, Rosenberg L (1984a) Smell identification ability: changes with age. Science 226:1441–1443

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Doty RL, Shaman P, Dann M (1984b) Development of the University of Pennsylvania Smell Identification Test: a standardized microencapsulated test of olfactory function. Physiol Behav 32:489–502

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Fornazieri MA, dos Santos CA, Bezerra TF, Pinna Fde R, Voegels RL, Doty RL (2015) Development of normative data for the Brazilian adaptation of the University of Pennsylvania Smell Identification Test. Chem Senses 40:141–149

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hsu NI, Lai JT, Shen PH (2015) Development of Taiwan Smell Identification Test: a quick office-based smell screening test for Taiwanese. Am J Rhinol 29:e50–e54

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hummel T, Kobal G, Gudziol H, Mackay-Sim A (2007) Normative data for the “Sniffin’Sticks” including tests of odor identification, odor discrimination, and olfactory thresholds: an upgrade. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 264:237–243

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hummel T, Nordin S (2005) Olfactory disorders and their consequences for quality of life. Acta Otolaryngol 125:116–121

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keller A, Malaspina D (2013) Hidden consequences of olfactory dysfunction: a patient report series. BMC Ear Nose Throat Disord 13:8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kobal G, Klimek L, Wolfensberger M, Gudziol H, Temmel A, Owen C et al (2000) Multicenter investigation of 1,036 subjects using a standardized method for the assessment of olfactory function combining tests of odor identification, odor discrimination, and olfactory thresholds. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 257:205–211

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lötsch J, Lange C, Hummel T (2004) A simple and reliable method for clinical assessment of odor thresholds. Chem Senses 29:311–317

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mackay-Sim A, Doty RL (2001) The University of Pennsylvania Smell Identification Test: normative adjustment for Australian subjects. Aust J Otolaryngol 4:174–177

    Google Scholar 

  • Murphy C, Schubert CR, Cruickshanks KJ, Klein BE, Klein R, Nondahl DM (2002) Prevalence of olfactory impairment in older adults. JAMA 288:2307–2312

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ogihara H, Kobayashi M, Nishida K, Kitano M, Takeuchi K (2011) Applicability of the cross-culturally modified University of Pennsylvania Smell Identification Test in a Japanese population. Am J Rhinol 25:404–410

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schiffman SS (1997) Taste and smell losses in normal aging and disease. JAMA 278:1357–1362

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Stevens JC, Cain WS, Burke RJ (1988) Variability of olfactory thresholds. Chem Senses 13:643–653

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Woodward MR, Amrutkar CV, Shah HC, Benedict RH, Rajakrishnan S, Doody RS et al (2017) Validation of olfactory deficit as a biomarker of Alzheimer disease. Neurol Clin Pract 7:5–14

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yousem D, Sobel N, Johnson B, Mainland J (2003) Functional Neuroimaging of Human Olfaction. In: Doty RL (ed) Handbook of Olfaction and Gustation, 2nd edn. CRC Press, Boca Raton, pp 251–273

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank Dr. Richard Doty for kindly providing samples of potential replacement odors for testing. The research was supported by the Russian Science Foundation 16-1510312 to VVV.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Vera V. Voznessenskaya .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Voznessenskaya, V.V., Klyuchnikova, M.A., Rodionova, E.I., Voznesenskaya, A. (2019). Adaptation of the University of Pennsylvania Smell Identification Test for the Population of Central Russia. In: Buesching, C. (eds) Chemical Signals in Vertebrates 14. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-17616-7_12

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics