Abstract
My introduction to modeling has gone through various stages. The first stage, in which I worked with the modeling team, was like an initiation process in which, as the initiate, I trusted my guides without really knowing where we were going or what the outcome would be. During this stage, I worked with the modeling team and a class of ten students – three doctoral students and seven undergraduates – to model Rodney Stark’s theory of why new religious movements succeed or fail. Based on our collaborative discussion of Stark’s ten propositions, the modeling team developed an agent-based model of Stark’s theory in NetLogo. In addition to analyzing the theory to help generate the model, the students and I provided the modeling team with historical data on ten NRMs in order to test the model against what actually happened. The model is currently at the validation stage, so we do not yet have analytical results. The second stage involved learning the basics of NetLogo and the discovery of generative social science, which builds models from the ground up in order to develop theories. This allowed me to distinguish between two different goals – modeling an extant theory in order to test it and modeling a phenomenon in order to generate a theory. This gave me a better understanding of what the modelers did to model Stark’s theory and a sense of choices I can make as I move forward. I hope to draw from both experiences to model a phenomenon central to my own research.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Epstein, Joshua M. 2006. Generative social science: Studies in agent-based computational modeling. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
———. (2014). Agent_Zero: Toward neurocognitive foundations for generative social science, vol. 25. Princeton University Press.
Epstein, Joshua M., and Robert Axtell. 1996. Growing artificial societies: Social science from the bottom up. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Stark, Rodney. 1996. Why religious movements succeed or fail: A revised general model. Journal of Contemporary Religion 11: 133–146.
Stark, Rodney, and William Sims Bainbridge. 1987. A theory of religion. New York: Lang.
Upal, M. Afzal. 2005a. Towards a cognitive science of new religious movements. Journal of Cognition and Culture 5 (1): 214–239.
Upal, M. Afzal. 2005b. Simulating the emergence of new religious movements. Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation 8 (1): 1–17.
Wilensky, Uri, and William Rand. 2015. An introduction to agent-based modeling: Modeling natural, social, and engineered complex systems with NetLogo. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Taves, A. (2019). Modeling Theories and Modeling Phenomena: A Humanist’s Initiation. In: Diallo, S., Wildman, W., Shults, F., Tolk, A. (eds) Human Simulation: Perspectives, Insights, and Applications. New Approaches to the Scientific Study of Religion , vol 7. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-17090-5_5
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-17090-5_5
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-17089-9
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-17090-5
eBook Packages: Religion and PhilosophyPhilosophy and Religion (R0)