Skip to main content
  • 365 Accesses

Abstract

Experimentation is almost always strictly connected to the use of biological samples and to biobanks. Experimentation of drug on human beings generally imply the research on biological samples and their genetic materials. Biobanks are units that collect biological samples by individuals or groups, together with their personal information. The chapter analysis the different theories, in a pluralistic setting, focusing on the concept of ‘donation’ of samples (form individualism to communitarianism), underlining the implication on informed consent. A specific role of Ethics Committees or Institutional Review Boards is highlighted.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 99.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    The Recommendation 2006/4 of the Council of Europe on research on biological materials of human origin and the Italian Data Protection Authority, General Authorization for the processing of genetic data (2007), both move in this direction.

  2. 2.

    Council of Europe (CoE) (2016) and European Commission (2012). See also: French National Consultative Ethics Committee for Health and Life Sciences (2003) and Italian Committee for Bioethics (2006, 2009, 2014).

  3. 3.

    At the international level, the concept of benefit sharing is found in the Universal Declaration on the Human Genome and Human Rights of UNESCO (1997) which states that the main goal of studying the human genome (generally speaking, the applications in biology, genetics and medicine) is to improve the health of individuals and humankind as a whole (Art. 12) according to the principle of solidarity (Art. 17). UNESCO reiterates the importance of benefit sharing also in the International Declaration on Human Genetic Data (2003) which sets forth that benefits resulting from the use of human genetic data of biological samples collected for scientific research should be shared with society as a whole and the international community (Art. 19).

  4. 4.

    Cambon-Thomson (2004), pp. 866–873; Dabrock et al. (2010); Dierickx and Borry (2009); Elger et al. (2008); Hansonn (2001); Knoppers (2006).

  5. 5.

    Italian Committee for Bioethics (1992, 1997, 2017).

  6. 6.

    A change is taking place in the regulation of committees for experimentation with the implementation of EU Regulation No. 536/2014 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 16 April 2014 on the clinical trials of drugs for human use and which repeals directive 2001/20/EC. Cfr. Italian Committee for Bioethics (2015).

  7. 7.

    The committees are made up of at least two clinicians, a general practitioner, a biostatistician, a pharmacologist, an expert in juridical-insurance matters or a medical examiner, a nursing representative, a volunteering representative, a chemist, the chief medical officer (the IRCCS scientific director) and an expert of ethics.

  8. 8.

    Friesen et al. (2017).

References

  • Cambon-Thomson, A. (2004). The social and ethical issues of post-genomic biobanks. Nature Reviews Genetics, 5, 866–873.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Council of Europe (CoE). (2016). Recommendation CM/Rec(2016)6 of the committee of ministers to member states on research on biological materials of human origin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dabrock, P., Taupitz, J., & Ried, R. (2010). Trust in biobanking: Dealing with ethical, legal and social issues in an emerging field of biotechnology. Dordrecht: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dierickx, K., & Borry, P. (2009). New challenges for biobanks: Ethics, law and governance. Cambridge: Intersentia Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elger, B., Mauron, A., Capron, A. M., & Andorno, R. B. (2008). Ethical issues in governing biobanks. Global perspectives. London: Ashgate Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • European Commission. (2012). Biobanks for Europe. A Challenge for Governance. Report of the Expert Group on Dealing with Ethical and Regulatory Challenges of International Biobank Research.

    Google Scholar 

  • French National Consultative Ethics Committee for Health and Life Sciences. (2003). Ethical issues raised by collections of biological material and associated information data: “Biobanks”, “Biolibraries”.

    Google Scholar 

  • Friesen, P., Kearns, L., Redman, B., & Caplan, A. L. (2017). Rethinking the Belmont Report. The American Journal of Bioethics, 17(7), 15–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hansonn, M. G. (Ed.). (2001). The use of human biobanks. Ethical, social, economical and legal aspects. Uppsala: Uppsala University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Italian Committee for Bioethics. (1992). Ethics committees.

    Google Scholar 

  • Italian Committee for Bioethics. (1997). Ethics committees in Italy: Recent issues.

    Google Scholar 

  • Italian Committee for Bioethics. (2006). Biobanks and research on human biological material.

    Google Scholar 

  • Italian Committee for Bioethics. (2009). Collection of biological samples for research purposes: Informed consent.

    Google Scholar 

  • Italian Committee for Bioethics. (2014). Paediatric biobanks.

    Google Scholar 

  • Italian Committee for Bioethics. (2015). Motion on the implementation of regulation (E.U.) no. 536/2014 of the European Parliament and the Council of 16 April 2014, in the subject of clinical trials on medicinal products for human use, repealing directive 2001/20/EC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Italian Committee for Bioethics. (2017). Clinical ethics committees.

    Google Scholar 

  • Knoppers, B. M. (2006). Biobanks: New challenges for bioethics and biolaw. Iustitia, 1, 47–53.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG and G. Giappichelli Editore

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Palazzani, L. (2019). Biobanks and Ethics Committees. In: Innovation in Scientific Research and Emerging Technologies. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-16733-2_2

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-16733-2_2

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-16732-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-16733-2

  • eBook Packages: Law and CriminologyLaw and Criminology (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics