Skip to main content

Sustaining Sociosituated Performativity with Collaboration

Sustaining Process in Performance and in the Everyday

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Politics of Practice

Part of the book series: Performance Philosophy ((PPH))

  • 193 Accesses

Abstract

The work of performers is to experience their self changing and becoming different, and to engage audiences in the embodiment of the change so that audience members open to the political potential of their own change. Making performance politically or making political performance will involve different strategies and structures, depending on the sociohistorical context in which the performer is working. Performers can develop practices that are more likely than not to generate a sociosituated positionality on the basis of alongside processes for becoming, knowing and valuing. These positionalities can drift into setting these alongside activities into a discursive field so they emerge into sociocultural articulation. Both are helpful, but without positionality, the set towards discourse can quickly become habit. To sustain the processual, performers need to foster practices of co-labouring rather than goal-oriented collectivity.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    gage: OED n. 1a. Something of value deposited to ensure the performance of some action; hence to en-gage, to take up the gage, the value of the performance.

  2. 2.

    I draw here specifically on daoist philosophy. There are also distinct parallels here with Erin Manning (2013), especially pages 16–30.

  3. 3.

    For example, Giorgio Agamben (2005) ties ‘crisis’ centrally to his theorising of the ‘state of exception’.

  4. 4.

    Lynette Hunter (2003).

  5. 5.

    But see Doreen Massey on ‘constellation’ for a use close to heteroglossia (Massey, 130) .

  6. 6.

    I realise that for Husserl and Merleau-Ponty, ‘transcendental’ may well be more ‘material’ than many readers take it to be, but make the distinction here to insist on the materiality.

  7. 7.

    Derrida’s logic completes as: we recognise the friend only when the process ceases at their death, at which time we recognise in our self the cessation of change and an embodied felt sense of the changes that person has initiated in our self. It is as if we carry the body of our friend in our own body, only becoming aware of it when the friend is no longer there to change with us.

  8. 8.

    See Michael Taussig for the concept of mimesis as porousness (Taussig 1993); or Michael Kelly on Derrida’s mimesis as the core of his concept of différance (Kelly 1998, 233).

  9. 9.

    I would like to suggest that Fred Moten and Stefano Harney’s concept of the ‘undercommons’ is a possible version of a positionality alongside discourse, although I would not presume to be able to feel whether this makes sense to them (Harney and Moten, The Undercommons: Fugitive Planning & Black Study (New York: Minor Compositions, 2013)).

  10. 10.

    For example, women in Canada were re-classified as ‘human’ in 1929.

  11. 11.

    The closer these groups are to discursive power, the more quickly they drift into corporate organisations. The process through which this happens is an area of sociology that is not being pursued in this book.

  12. 12.

    See Levinas (1974/1998, 159–60), and the translator’s introduction, xli–xlii.

  13. 13.

    This distinction draws from the rhetorical definition of ‘topical’ as ‘related to content’ (for example, a simile) and ‘schematic’ as ‘related to structure’ (for example, a chiasmus, or: part A, part B, part B, part A).

  14. 14.

    For commentary on the interplay of genre and allegory, see Hunter (1989).

  15. 15.

    Roland Barthes, in Mythologies, posits an argument for affective rather than effective revolution in his discussion of the ‘woodcutter’ (Barthes 1957, 219–20). Barthes is often criticised for this passage partly because the initial most widely distributed translation into English does not underline the difference he makes between the intransitive sense of ‘agir’ which is related to behaviour and having ‘efficaciousness over’ [http://www.larousse.com/en/dictionaries/french/agir/1663?q=agir#1667] another person or thing, and the transitive sense ‘faire agir’ [http://www.larousse.com/en/dictionaries/french/agir/1664?q=agir#750011] which is to animate or enact a person or thing (Hunter and Schubert 2013).

References

  • Adorno, Theodor. 1970. Aesthetic Theory. Edited by Gretel Adorno and Rolf Tiedemann, translated by Robert Hullot-Kentor. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  • Agamben, Giorgio. 2005. The State of Exception. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barthes, Roland. 1957. Mythologies. Paris: Seuil.

    Google Scholar 

  • Churchill, Caryl. c.1979. Cloud Nine in Plays One. London: Routledge, 1985.

    Google Scholar 

  • Derrida, Jacques. 1975. Economimésis. In Mimésis des articulations, ed. Sylviane Agacinski, et al., 55–93. Paris: Aubier-Flammarion.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1997. The Animal that Therefore I Am. Translated by David Wills and edited by Maire-Luise Mallet. New York: Fordham University Press, 2008.

    Google Scholar 

  • Diamond, Elin. 1997. Unmaking Mimesis: Essays on Feminism and Theater. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fischer-Lichte, Erike. 2004. The Transformative Power of Performance: A New Aesthetics. Translated by Saskia Jain. London: Routledge, 2008.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hartman, Saidiya. 1997. Scenes of Subjection: Terror, Slavery, and Self-Making in Nineteenth-Century America. Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hill Collins, Patricia. 1990. Black Feminist Thought: Knowledge, Consciousness, and the Politics of Empowerment. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hunter, Lynette. 1989. Modern Allegory and Fantasy. London: Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2001. Listening to Situated Textuality: Working on Differentiated Public Voices. In Gendering Ethics/The Ethics of Gender, ed. Linda Hogan and Sasha Roseneil. Feminist Theory 2 (2): 205–218.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2003. Unruly Fugues. In Interrogating Cultural Studies: Theory, Politics and Practice, ed. Paul Bowman, 233–252. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2013. Installation and Constellation. In Performance Studies: KeyWords, Concepts, and Theories, ed. Bryan Reynolds, 141–155. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2014. Disunified Aesthetics: Situated Textuality, Performativity, Collaboration. Montréal: McGill Queen’s University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hunter, Lynette, and Peter Lichtenfels. 2002. Seeing through the National and Global Stereotypes: British Theatre in Crisis? In Theatre in Crisis?: Performance Manifestos for a New Century, ed. Maria Delgado and Caridad Svich. Manchester University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hunter, Lynette, and Richard Schubert. 2013. Winning, Losing, and Wandering Play: Zhuangzian Paradox and Daoist Practice. Journalism, Media and Cultural Studies 5 (Summer): 23pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kelly, Michael, ed. 1998. Mimesis. In The Encyclopedia of Aesthetics, vol. 3, 233. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levinas, Emmanuel. 1974. Otherwise than Being: Or Beyond Essence. Translated and introduced by Alphonso Lingis. Duquesne University Press, 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  • Manning, Erin. 2013. Always More than One: Individuation’s Dance. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marriott, David. 2007. Haunted Life: Visual Culture and Black Modernity. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Massey, Doreen. 2005. For Space. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Merleau-Ponty, Maurice. 1950. Course Notes: Husserl at the Limits of Phenomenology. In Husserl at the Limits of Phenomenology, trans. Leonard Lawlor and Bettina Bergo, ed. David Levin. Evanston: Northwestern University Press, 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morton, Stephen. 2007. Gayatri Spivak: Ethics, Subalternity and The Critique of Postcolonial Reason. Cambridge: Polity.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sexton, Jared. 2009. Assimilation Schemes: Antiblackness and the Critique of Multiracialism. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spillers, Hortense. 1987. Mama’s Baby, Papa’s Maybe: An American Grammar Book. Diacritics, Culture and Countermemory: The ‘American’ Connection 17 (2): 64–68.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taussig, Micel. 1993. Mimesis and Alterity. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilderson, Frank, III. 2005. Reparations Now. Produced by Anita Wilkins, Obsidian Productions, 2005.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2012. “Raw Life” and the Ruse of Empathy. In Performance, Politics, and Activism, ed. Peter Lichtenfels and John Rouse. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Lynette Hunter .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Hunter, L. (2019). Sustaining Sociosituated Performativity with Collaboration. In: Politics of Practice. Performance Philosophy. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-14019-9_4

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics