Skip to main content

Electrochemical Measurements as Screening Method for Water Oxidation Catalyst

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Testing Novel Water Oxidation Catalysts for Solar Fuels Production

Part of the book series: PoliTO Springer Series ((PTSS))

  • 410 Accesses

Abstract

In actual water splitting devices, the WOC will be deposited on an anode surface. Therefore, whatever the results obtained with WOC particles suspended in stirrer tank reactors, it becomes necessary to study WOC performances by means of electrochemical experimental setups. The WOCs deposition on an anode will depend on their physico-chemical nature, therefore several deposition methods, including wet and dry approaches, are found in literature. This Chapter reviews the available electrochemical techniques that can be adopted to study WOCs that are deposited on an electrode. In addition, the parameters used in literature to compare the different WOC materials will be explained. At the end of the Chapter, an example of the performance of different MnOx films will be reported. The water oxidation activity of three MnOx crystalline phases prepared by two deposition techniques will be compared. The aim of the comparison is to determine whether two electrodes having the same crystalline phase behave differently or not when they are deposited by two different techniques.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. McCrory CCL, Jung S, Ferrer IM, Chatman SM, Peters JC, Jaramillo TF (2015) Benchmarking hydrogen evolving reaction and oxygen evolving reaction electrocatalysts for solar water splitting devices. J Am Chem Soc 137(13):4347–4357. https://doi.org/10.1021/ja510442p

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. McCrory CCL, Jung S, Peters JC, Jaramillo TF (2013) Benchmarking heterogeneous electrocatalysts for the oxygen evolution reaction. J Am Chem Soc 135(45):16977–16987. https://doi.org/10.1021/ja407115p

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Li G, Anderson L, Chen Y, Pan M, Abel Chuang P-Y (2018) New insights into evaluating catalyst activity and stability for oxygen evolution reactions in alkaline media. Sustain Energy Fuels 2(1):237–251. https://doi.org/10.1039/c7se00337d

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Hernández S, Ottone C, Varetti S, Fontana M, Pugliese D, Saracco G, Bonelli B, Armandi M (2016) Spin-coated vs. electrodeposited Mn oxide films as water oxidation catalysts. Materials 9(4):296

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Hernández S, Thalluri SM, Sacco A, Bensaid S, Saracco G, Russo N (2015) Photo-catalytic activity of BiVO4 thin-film electrodes for solar-driven water splitting. Appl Catal A 504:266–271. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apcata.2015.01.019

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Hernández S, Saracco G, Alexe-Ionescu AL, Barbero G (2014) Electric investigation of a photo-electrochemical water splitting device based on a proton exchange membrane within drilled FTO-covered quartz electrodes: under dark and light conditions. Electrochim Acta 144:352–360. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.electacta.2014.08.057

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Hernández S, Hidalgo D, Sacco A, Chiodoni A, Lamberti A, Cauda V, Tresso E, Saracco G (2015) Comparison of photocatalytic and transport properties of TiO2 and ZnO nanostructures for solar-driven water splitting. Phys Chem Chem Phys 17(12):7775–7786

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Pizem H, Sukenik CN, Sampathkumaran U, McIlwain AK, De Guire MR (2002) Effects of substrate surface functionality on solution-deposited titania films. Chem Mater 14(6):2476–2485. https://doi.org/10.1021/cm010776e

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Liu J, Shahid M, Ko Y-S, Kim E, Ahn TK, Park JH, Kwon Y-U (2013) Investigation of porosity and heterojunction effects of a mesoporous hematite electrode on photoelectrochemical water splitting. Phys Chem Chem Phys 15(24):9775–9782. https://doi.org/10.1039/c3cp51053k

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Byun D, Jin Y, Kim B, Kee Lee J, Park D (2000) Photocatalytic TiO2 deposition by chemical vapor deposition. J Hazard Mater 73(2):199–206. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-3894(99)00179-X

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Roger I, Shipman MA, Symes MD (2017) Earth-abundant catalysts for electrochemical and photoelectrochemical water splitting. Nat Rev Chem 1:0003. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41570-016-0003

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Roger I, Symes MD (2016) First row transition metal catalysts for solar-driven water oxidation produced by electrodeposition. J Mater Chem A 4(18):6724–6741. https://doi.org/10.1039/c5ta09423b

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Monfort O, Raptis D, Satrapinskyy L, Roch T, Plesch G, Lianos P (2017) Production of hydrogen by water splitting in a photoelectrochemical cell using a BiVO4/TiO2 layered photoanode. Electrochim Acta 251:244–249. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.electacta.2017.08.125

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Laurenti M, Cauda V (2018) Porous zinc oxide thin films: synthesis approaches and applications. Coatings 8(2):67

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Creighton J, Ho P (2001) Introduction to chemical vapor deposition (CVD). Chem Vap Deposition 2:1–22

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Doyle R, Lyons M (2013) Kinetics and mechanistic aspects of the oxygen evolution reaction at hydrous iron oxide films in base. J Electrochem Soc 160(2):H142–H154

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Doyle RL, Lyons MEG (2013) An electrochemical impedance study of the oxygen evolution reaction at hydrous iron oxide in base. Phys Chem Chem Phys 15(14):5224–5237. https://doi.org/10.1039/c3cp43464h

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Huynh M, Bediako DK, Nocera DG (2014) A functionally stable manganese oxide oxygen evolution catalyst in acid. J Am Chem Soc 136(16):6002–6010. https://doi.org/10.1021/ja413147e

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Zaharieva I, Chernev P, Risch M, Klingan K, Kohlhoff M, Fischer A, Dau H (2012) Electrosynthesis, functional, and structural characterization of a water-oxidizing manganese oxide. Energy Environ Sci 5(5):7081–7089. https://doi.org/10.1039/c2ee21191b

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Etzi Coller Pascuzzi M, Selinger E, Sacco A, Castellino M, Rivolo P, Hernández S, Lopinski G, Tamblyn I, Nasi R, Esposito S, Manzoli M, Bonelli B, Armandi M (2018) Beneficial effect of Fe addition on the catalytic activity of electrodeposited MnOx films in the water oxidation reaction. Electrochim Acta 284:294–302. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.electacta.2018.07.148

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Browne MP, Nolan H, Twamley B, Duesberg GS, Colavita PE, Lyons MEG (2016) Thermally prepared Mn2O3/RuO2/Ru thin films as highly active catalysts for the oxygen evolution reaction in alkaline media. ChemElectroChem 3(11):1847–1855. https://doi.org/10.1002/celc.201600370

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Stevens MB, Enman LJ, Batchellor AS, Cosby MR, Vise AE, Trang CDM, Boettcher SW (2017) Measurement techniques for the study of thin film heterogeneous water oxidation electrocatalysts. Chem Mater 29(1):120–140. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.chemmater.6b02796

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Nakayama M, Fujimoto K, Kobayakawa T, Okada T (2017) A binder-free thin film anode composed of Co2+-intercalated buserite grown on carbon cloth for oxygen evolution reaction. Electrochem Commun 84:24–27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.elecom.2017.09.012

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Thenuwara AC, Shumlas SL, Attanayake NH, Aulin YV, McKendry IG, Qiao Q, Zhu Y, Borguet E, Zdilla MJ, Strongin DR (2016) Intercalation of cobalt into the interlayer of birnessite improves oxygen evolution catalysis. ACS Catalysis 6(11):7739–7743. https://doi.org/10.1021/acscatal.6b01980

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Gong M, Li Y, Wang H, Liang Y, Wu JZ, Zhou J, Wang J, Regier T, Wei F, Dai H (2013) An advanced Ni–Fe layered double hydroxide electrocatalyst for water oxidation. J Am Chem Soc 135(23):8452–8455. https://doi.org/10.1021/ja4027715

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Indra A, Menezes PW, Zaharieva I, Baktash E, Pfrommer J, Schwarze M, Dau H, Driess M (2013) Active mixed-valent MnOx water oxidation catalysts through partial oxidation (corrosion) of nanostructured MnO particles. Angew Chem Int Ed 52(50):13206–13210. https://doi.org/10.1002/anie.201307543

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Huynh M, Shi C, Billinge SJL, Nocera DG (2015) Nature of activated manganese oxide for oxygen evolution. J Am Chem Soc 137(47):14887–14904. https://doi.org/10.1021/jacs.5b06382

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Tong J, Liu Y, Peng Q, Hu W, Wu Q (2017) An efficient Sb-SnO2-supported IrO2 electrocatalyst for the oxygen evolution reaction in acidic medium. J Mater Sci 52(23):13427–13443. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-017-1447-1

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Chou S, Cheng F, Chen J (2006) Electrodeposition synthesis and electrochemical properties of nanostructured γ-MnO2 films. J Power Sour 162(1):727–734. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpowsour.2006.06.033

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Zhou F, Izgorodin A, Hocking RK, Spiccia L, MacFarlane DR (2012) Electrodeposited MnOx films from ionic liquid for electrocatalytic water oxidation. Adv Energy Mater 2(8):1013–1021. https://doi.org/10.1002/aenm.201100783

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Wu M-S (2005) Electrochemical capacitance from manganese oxide nanowire structure synthesized by cyclic voltammetric electrodeposition. Appl Phys Lett 87(15):153102. http://dx.doi.org/10.1063/1.2089169

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Ramírez A, Hillebrand P, Stellmach D, May MM, Bogdanoff P, Fiechter S (2014) Evaluation of MnOx, Mn2O3, and Mn3O4 electrodeposited films for the oxygen evolution reaction of water. J Phys Chem C 118(26):14073–14081. https://doi.org/10.1021/jp500939d

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Ottone C, Armandi M, Hernández S, Bensaid S, Fontana M, Pirri CF, Saracco G, Garrone E, Bonelli B (2015) Effect of surface area on the rate of photocatalytic water oxidation as promoted by different manganese oxides. Chem Eng J 278:36–45. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2015.01.014

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Bagshaw SA, Prouzet E, Pinnavaia TJ (1995) Templating of mesoporous molecular sieves by nonionic polyethylene oxide surfactants. Science 269(5228):1242–1244. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.269.5228.1242

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Carminna Ottone .

Appendix

Appendix

5.1.1 Characterization Techniques

XRD patterns of the films were collected on an X’Pert Phillips diffractometer using Cu Kα radiation = 1.541874 Å (20–60 2θ range; step width = 0.02°; time per step = 2 s) and indexed according to the Powder Data File database (PDF 2000, International Centre of Diffraction Data, Pennsylvania). The morphology of the samples was studied by Field Emission Scanning Electron Microscopy (FE-SEM) pictures, which were collected on a high-resolution instrument (LEO 1525). Cross-section images were used to determine the average film thickness of selected samples.

5.1.2 Electrochemical Measurements

The catalytic activity of the Mn oxides films was tested at pH = 7 in 0.1 M phosphate buffer in a standard three-electrodes setup in a lab-made glass cell with Ag/AgCl (3 M KCl) electrode as reference electrode and a Pt wire as counter electrode. The measurements were recorded using a multichannel VSP potentiostat/galvanostat (BioLogic), with EC-Lab v. 10.1x software for data acquisition. Cyclic voltammetries (CV) were performed in the range of 0.6 to 2.0 V versus RHE with a sweep rate of 20 mV s−1. Tafel plots were constructed from the data obtained from quasi-stationary current density between 1.4 and 2.0 V versus RHE (with steps of 40 mV). Ohmic drop correction was performed, hence, impedance spectra were recorded at every potential/current step at 10 kHz with a modulation amplitude of 20 mV in order to determine the ohmic resistance of the solution (Rs). The overpotential (η) reported in the Tafel plot was calculated as follow: \(\eta = E_{RHE} - E_{RHE}^{0} - i R\), where \({\text{E}}_{\text{RHE}}^{0}\) is the standard potential of the water splitting reaction (~1.23 V) and i is the current density.

Evolved oxygen and hydrogen was measured by a micro-GC (Varian 490, equipped with a Molsieve column) during chrono-amperometry test (at 2.0 V vs. RHE). Previous the experiment, the cell was purged with a continuous Ar flow (25 Nml min−1) for 1 h. Argon flow was maintained during the experiment to strip the evolved O2 and H2 gases from the cell to the micro-GC.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Ottone, C., Hernández, S., Armandi, M., Bonelli, B. (2019). Electrochemical Measurements as Screening Method for Water Oxidation Catalyst. In: Testing Novel Water Oxidation Catalysts for Solar Fuels Production. PoliTO Springer Series. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-12712-1_5

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics