Abstract
Benefits of using the ethological approach in space field were first demonstrated on short-duration human missions then developed in the perspective of long-term missions for manned Mars exploration and Lunar village. We investigated a large panel of real and simulated situations (space shuttle, orbital stations, parabolic flights, bed rests, water immersion, confined chambers, Arctic expedition, and Antarctic bases) for better understanding the human adaptation to isolation, confinement, and autonomy. New goals of application are to propose complementary tools and an efficient method that assess positive actions of operators who cope with routine works and unexpected events while minimizing human factor (HF) risks in interactive space operations. As a preliminary study, we applied the ethological method for HF assessment within the interaction operators/systems during the satellite’s control-command operations. The question is on how the operators optimize their relationship with the system in which they interact as positive human dependability for the success of missions. The proposed method, based on the observation, description, and quantification of spontaneous spatial-motor actions, is to check the relevant behavioral indicators in operational situations. We give details about the tools and examples of analyses performed inside the network operations center (COR), at the Toulouse Space Center, in France. Observational data focused on interactions, actions, positions, displacements, distances, and orientations of the observed subjects in satellite’s post-launch situation on one side, and in routine situation on the other side. We completed the analyses during training procedures (Pleiades tests). The preliminary results support the relevance and report the opportunity of such an approach in next space operations. We emphasize the relationships between human behavior and human factor.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Abbreviations
- HF:
-
Human Factor
- NOC:
-
Network Operations Center
- OR1:
-
Routine Operator 1
- OR2:
-
Routine Operator 2
- OG1:
-
Galileo Operator 1
- OG2:
-
Galileo Operator 2
- IA1:
-
Coordinating Engineer 1
- IA2:
-
Coordinating Engineer 2
- OC1:
-
Control Operator 1
- OC2:
-
Control Operator 2
- IM1:
-
Mission Engineer 1
- IM2:
-
Mission Engineer 2
- H/S:
-
Human/System interaction
- H/Hi:
-
Human/Human inner interaction
- H/He:
-
Human/Human external interaction
- H/E:
-
Human/Environment interaction
- R-zone:
-
Routine area
- G1-zone:
-
Galileo area 1
- G2-zone:
-
Galileo area 2
- GC-zone:
-
Galileo Central area
- GS-zone:
-
Galileo Specific area
- Off-zone:
-
Out-of-area
- I:
-
Intimate space
- Po:
-
Personal space
- S:
-
Social space
- Pu:
-
Public space
References
Tafforin, C., Thon, B., Guell, A., & Campan, R. (1989). Astronaut behavior in orbital flight situation: Preliminary ethological analysis. Aviation, Space and Environmental Medicine, 60, 949–956.
Tafforin, C. (1994). Synthesis of ethological studies on behavioural adaptation of the astronaut to space flight conditions. Acta Astronautica, 32(2), 131–142.
Tafforin, C. (1996). Initial moments of adaptation to microgravity of human orientation behavior, in parabolic flight conditions. Acta Astronautica, 38(12), 963–971.
Tafforin, C. (2002). Ethological observations on a small group of wintering members at Dumont d’Urville station (Terre Adélie). Antarctic Science, 14(4), 310–318.
Tafforin, C. (2005). Ethological indicators of isolated and confined teams in the perspective of Mars missions. Aviation, Space and Environmental Medicine, 76, 1083–1087.
Tafforin, C. (2009). From summer to winter at Concordia station in Antarctica: A pilot study for preparing missions to Mars. In Proceeding of the 60th International Astronautical Congress, IAC-09-A1.1.6.
Tafforin, C. (2011). The ethological approach as a new way of investigating behavioural health in the Arctic. Journal of Circumpolar health, 70(2), 109–112.
Tafforin, C. (2013). The MARS-500 crew in daily life activities: An ethological study. Acta Astronautica, 91, 69–76.
Tafforin, C. (2015). Behavior, isolation and confinement. In D. Beysens & J. Van Loon (Eds.), Generation and application of extra-terrestrial environment on Earth (Vol. 6, 26, pp. 265–271). Rever Publishers Book.
Tafforin, C., & Gerebtzoff, D. (2010). A software-based solution for research in space ethology. Aviation, Space and Environmental Medicine, 81, 951–956.
Tafforin, C. (1993). Ethological analysis of human coordinated movements in weightlessness: Comparison between the first and last days of short-term space flights. Journal of Human Movement Study, 24, 119–133.
Tafforin, C., & Campan, R. (1994). Ethological experiments of human orientation behavior within a three-dimensional space—In microgravity. Advances in Space Research, 14(8), 415–418. Oxford, Royaume-Uni: Pergamon Press.
Tafforin, C., Vinokhodova, A. G., Chekalina, A. I., & Gushin, V. (2015). Correlation of etho-social and psycho-social data from MARS-500 interplanetary simulation. Acta Astronautica, 111, 19–28.
Johannes, B., Sitev, A. S., Vinokhodova, A. G., Salnitski, V. P., Savchenko, E. G., Artyukhova, A. E., et al. (2015). Wireless monitoring of changes in crew relations during long-duration mission simulation. Plos-One, 10(8). August 7, 2015, online.
Tafforin, C., & Giner Abati, F. (2016). Interaction and communication abilities in a multicultural crew simulating living and working habits at the Mars desert research station. Antrocom Journal of Anthropology, 12(2), 97–110.
Tafforin, C., & Delvolvé, N. (1991). Les activités collatérales de l’astronaute: Indices d’adaptation comportementale à la situation d’impesanteur. Sciences et motricité, 14, 27–33.
Tamponnet, C. (1996). Life-support systems for Lunar missions. Advances in Space Research, 18(11), 103–110.
Tafforin, C. (2018). From human behavior to human factor in aerospace, astronautics and space operations. Aviation and Aeronautical Science, 1(1), 1–3.
Tafforin, C. (2015). The ethological tool for human factors assessment in the interactive space operations. In 4th Human Dependability Workshop, ESOC-ESA. Darmstadt, Germany, October 6–7, 2015.
Galet, G., Tafforin, C., & Michel, S. (2017). Feedback after a first ethological experience, human factor in operations. In 5th Human Dependability Workshop, ESA-Estec. Noordwijk, Netherlands, November 14–16, 2017.
Galet, G. (2014). Optimization/evolution of the operational trades & skills. In SpaceOps 2014 Conference Proceedings. Pasadena, Canada, May 5–9, 2014.
Hall, E. T. (1971). La dimension cachée. In The Hidden Dimension. Paris, France: Seuil.
Strzepek, A., Estevem, F., Salas, S., Millet, B., & Darnes H. (2016). A training, operations and maintenance simulator (TOMS) made to serve the MERLIN mission. In SpaceOps 2016 Conference Proceedings. Daejeon, Korea, May 16–20, 2016.
Acknowledgements
The authors wish to thank CNES for its financial supports within the «Life Sciences» thematic and from the CNES Operations division. Additionally, the authors are grateful to all the participants to the study.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Tafforin, C., Michel, S., Galet, G. (2019). Ethological Approach of the Human Factors from Space Missions to Space Operations. In: Pasquier, H., Cruzen, C., Schmidhuber, M., Lee, Y. (eds) Space Operations: Inspiring Humankind's Future. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-11536-4_30
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-11536-4_30
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-11535-7
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-11536-4
eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)