Skip to main content

Mind Before Matter: Reversing the Arrow of Fundamentality

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
What is Fundamental?

Part of the book series: The Frontiers Collection ((FRONTCOLL))

  • 1434 Accesses

Abstract

In this contribution, I suggest that it is sometimes a step forward to reverse our intuition on “what is fundamental”, a move that is somewhat reminiscent of the idea of noncommutative geometry. I argue that some foundational conceptual problems in physics and related fields motivate us to attempt such a reversal of perspective, and to take seriously the idea that an information-theoretic notion of observer (“mind”) could in some sense be more fundamental than our intuitive idea of a physical world (“matter”). I sketch what such an approach could look like, and why it would complement but not contradict the view that the material world is the cause of our experience.

M. P. Müller—Dedicated to Nadine, and all the other fearless stubborn explorers out there.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    I am omitting some mathematical details here to keep the presentation accessible.

  2. 2.

    Here, “moment” does not refer to some externally given time, but to an integer labelling of the subjective states.

  3. 3.

    As explained in [14], it would be more natural to formulate this postulate in terms of a Markovian probability measure, one for which the (probability of the) next state only depends on the current state and not on all previous ones. However, finding such a formulation and exploring its properties is mathematically much more challenging; it is currently an open problem.

  4. 4.

    Interested readers should look at [14, 16] for the correct mathematical definitions.

  5. 5.

    This is a special case of the definition in [14]. See also [14] for issues related to Goodman’s New Riddle of Induction.

References

  1. Hansson, S.O.: In: Zalta, E.N. (ed.) Science and Pseudo-Science, Summer 2017 edn. The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/sum2017/entries/pseudo-science/

  2. Kuhn, T.S.: The Copernican Revolution. Harvard University Press, Cambridge (1957)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Chalmers, D.: Facing up the problem of consciousness. In: Chalmers, D. (ed.) The Character of Consciousness. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Lizzi, F.: The structure of spacetime and noncommutative geometry. In: Geometry, Topology, QFT and Cosmology, 28–30 Maggio 2008, Paris, France (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Pearl, J.: Causality—Models, Reasoning, and Inference. Cambridge University Press, New York (2009)

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  6. Albrecht, A.: Cosmic inflation and the arrow of time. In: Barrow, J.D., Davies, P.C.W., Harper, C.L. (eds.) Science and Ultimate Reality: From Quantum to Cosmos (honoring John Wheeler’s 90th birthday). Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Albrecht, A., Sorbo, L.: Can the universe afford inflation? Phys. Rev. D 70, 063528 (2004)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  8. Bostrom, N.: Are you living in a computer simulation? Philosophical Quarterly 53(211), 243–255 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Peres, A.: Quantum Theory: Concepts and Methods. Kluwer Academic Publishers, New York (2002)

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  10. Bell, J.S.: On the Einstein Podolsky Rosen Paradox. Physics 1(3), 195–200 (1964)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  11. Bell, J.S.: On the problem of hidden variables in quantum mechanics. Rev. Mod. Phys. 38(3), 447–452 (1966)

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  12. Brukner, Č.: On the quantum measurement problem. In: Bertlmann, R., Zeilinger, A. (eds.) Quantum (Un)Speakables II — Half a Century of Bell’s Theorem. Springer International Publishing, Switzerland (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Frauchiger, D., Renner, R.: Quantum theory cannot consistently describe the use of itself. Nat. Comm. 9, 3711 (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Müller, M.P.: arXiv:1712.01826

  15. Müller, M.P.: arXiv:1712.01816

  16. Li, M., Vitányi, P.: An Introduction to Kolmogorov Complexity and Its Applications. Springer, New York (1997)

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  17. Hutter, M.: Universal Artificial Intelligence. Springer, New York (2005)

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  18. Picture from https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Conway%27s_Game_of_Life. Accessed 19 Jan 2018. Licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 Unported license

  19. Wheeler, J.A.: Law without law. In: Wheeler, J.A., Zurek, W.H. (eds.) Quantum Theory and Measurement. Princeton Series in Physics. Princeton University Press, Princeton (1983)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Markus P. Müller .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Müller, M.P. (2019). Mind Before Matter: Reversing the Arrow of Fundamentality. In: Aguirre, A., Foster, B., Merali, Z. (eds) What is Fundamental?. The Frontiers Collection. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-11301-8_7

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics