Skip to main content

Fundamental?

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
What is Fundamental?

Part of the book series: The Frontiers Collection ((FRONTCOLL))

Abstract

It’s family games night, and we’re playing a guessing game. My mother—not a physicist—picks up a card and says, ‘A fundamental particle.’

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Norton, J.: Einstein’s special theory of relativity and the problems in the electrodynamics of moving bodies that led him to it. In: Janssen, M., Lehner, C. (eds.) Cambridge Companion to Einstein. Cambridge University Press (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Hankinson, R. Causes. In: Anagnostopoulos, G. (ed.) A Companion to Aristotle, Blackwell Companions to Philosophy. Wiley-Blackwell (2009). https://books.google.co.uk/books?id=mqpEAQAACAAJ

  3. Anderson, J.: A History of Aerodynamics: And Its Impact on Flying Machines. Cambridge Aerospace Series. Cambridge University Press (1999). https://books.google.co.uk/books?id=GzVIBAAAQBAJ

  4. Newton, I., Cohen, I., Whitman, A., Budenz, J.: The Principia: Mathematical Principles of Natural Philosophy. University of California Press (1999). https://books.google.co.uk/books?id=uLaXBAAAQBAJ

  5. Hájek, A.: Interpretations of probability. In: Zalta, E.N. (ed.) The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Metaphysics Research Lab, Stanford University (2012). Winter 2012 edn

    Google Scholar 

  6. Jaynes, E.T.: Information theory and statistical mechanics. Phys. Rev. 106, 620–630 (1957). http://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRev.106.620

  7. Hacking, I.: The Emergence of Probability: A Philosophical Study of Early Ideas about Probability, Induction and Statistical Inference. Cambridge Series on Statistical and Probabilistic Mathematics. Cambridge University Press (2006). https://books.google.co.uk/books?id=ewqzOGDKYscC

  8. Laplace, P.: A Philosophical Essay on Probabilities. Springer, New York (1826, 1995)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Peirce, C.: Note on the doctrine of chances. In: Hartshorne, C., Weiss, P. (eds.) Collected Papers of Charles Sanders Peirce, vol. 31. J. Philos. (1934)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Sklar, L.: Philosophy of statistical mechanics. In: Zalta, E.N. (ed.) The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Metaphysics Research Lab, Stanford University (2015). Fall 2015 edn

    Google Scholar 

  11. Kochen, S., Specker, E.: The problem of hidden variables in quantum mechanics. In: Hooker, C. (ed.) The Logico-Algebraic Approach to Quantum Mechanics. The University of Western Ontario Series in Philosophy of Science, vol. 5, pp. 293–328. Springer, Netherlands (1975). http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-94-010-1795-4_17

  12. Spekkens, R.W.: Contextuality for preparations, transformations, and unsharp measurements. Phys. Rev. A 71, 052108 (2005). arXiv:0406166

  13. Colbeck, R., Renner, R.: Is a system’s wave function in one-to-one correspondence with its elements of reality? Phys. Rev. Lett. 108, 150402 (2012). http://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevLett.108.150402

  14. Srednicki, M.: Subjective and objective probabilities in quantum mechanics. Phys. Rev. A 71, 052107 (2005). arXiv:0501009

  15. Maudlin, T.: What could be objective about probabilities? Stud. Hist. Philos. Sci. Part B 38, 275–291 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Hoefer, C.: Causal determinism. In: Zalta, E.N. (ed.) The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Metaphysics Research Lab, Stanford University (2016). Spring 2016 edn

    Google Scholar 

  17. Ismael, J.: A modest proposal about chance. J. Philos. 108, 416–442 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Paz, J.P., Zurek, W.H.: Environment-induced decoherence and the transition from quantum to classical, p. 533 (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Schlosshauer, M.: The quantum-to-classical transition and decoherence. arXiv e-prints (2014). arXiv:1404.2635

  20. de Spinoza, B., Curley, E.: The Collected Works of Spinoza, vol. 1. Princeton University Press (2016). https://books.google.co.uk/books?id=f7EHDAAAQBAJ

  21. Melamed, Y.Y., Lin, M.: Principle of sufficient reason. In: Zalta, E.N. (ed.) The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Metaphysics Research Lab, Stanford University (2017). Spring 2017 edn

    Google Scholar 

  22. Rescher, N.: G.W. Leibniz’s Monadology: An Edition for Students. University of Pittsburgh Press (1991). https://books.google.co.uk/books?id=L3QZBAAAQBAJ

  23. Kragh, H.: Contemporary history of cosmology and the controversy over the multiverse. Ann. Sci. 66, 529–551 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1080/00033790903047725

  24. Wallace, D.: Everett and structure. Stud. Hist. Philos. Sci. Part B. Stud. Hist. Philos. Modern Phys. 34, 87–105 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  25. Wallace, D.: The logic of the past hypothesis. In: Loewer, B., Winsberg, E., Weslake, B. (eds.) Currently-untitled volume discussing David Albert’s "Time and Chance"(2011). http://philsci-archive.pitt.edu/8894/

  26. Bostrom, D., Bostrom, N.: Anthropic Bias: Observation Selection Effects in Science and Philosophy. Taylor & Francis (2013). https://books.google.co.uk/books?id=PUtUAQAAQBAJ

  27. Guth, A.H.: Inflationary universe: a possible solution to the horizon and flatness problems. Phys. Rev. D 23, 347–356 (1981). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.23.347

  28. van Riel, R., Van Gulick, R.: Scientific reduction. In: Zalta, E.N. (ed.) The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Metaphysics Research Lab, Stanford University (2016). Winter 2016 edn

    Google Scholar 

  29. Wharton, K.: The Universe is not a Computer. In: Aguirre, A., Foster, B., Merali, G. (eds.) Questioning the Foundations of Physics. Springer, pp. 177–190 (2015). arXiv:1211.7081

  30. Baez, J.: Renormalization made easy (2009). http://math.ucr.edu/home/baez/renormalization.html

  31. Butterfield, J., Bouatta, N.: Renormalization for philosophers. arXiv e-prints (2014). arXiv:1406.4532

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Emily Adlam .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Adlam, E. (2019). Fundamental?. In: Aguirre, A., Foster, B., Merali, Z. (eds) What is Fundamental?. The Frontiers Collection. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-11301-8_2

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics