Skip to main content

CSR, Sustainability and Green IT in Higher Education: An Australian Perspective

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Responsible Business in Uncertain Times and for a Sustainable Future

Part of the book series: CSR, Sustainability, Ethics & Governance ((CSEG))

Abstract

This study aims to examine the promoting of ITS6 students’ learning and awareness towards Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR), Sustainability, and Green IT (Information Technology) specifically in higher education. Currently, businesses, governments, health, social works and education (school and tertiary) have started not to only look at, but adopt and integrate both CSR and Sustainability in their strategies to enhance their reputation seeking uniqueness in the market either locally or globally. To allow the postgraduate students to become major participants in the business world when they graduate, an Australian university developed a unit called ITS6 to improve students’ awareness of CSR and sustainability including the roles IT play in business, specifically technology waste and recycling might have on the environment. The development of ITS6 unit derived after the Global Financial Crisis of 2008/2009 as business schools were amongst those parties who have been accused of being partners in the economic, societal and environmental disappointments. The preliminary analyses of data collected via formal and informal feedback from 127 students, revealed that ITS6 assessments (i.e. reflective journals, wikis, digital presentation and report writing) managed to increase students’ awareness towards CSR, sustainability, and improve students’ personal and professional skills for their tertiary studies which they will carry forward to their workplace in the future. In addition, students demonstrated their satisfaction with ITS6 assessments, as they felt those assessments had developed specific skills such as cultural environmental awareness, cutting edge technology, and the generation of appreciation and respect in their minds for the environment.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Alexander, J. (2007). Environmental sustainability versus profit maximization: Overcoming systemic constraints on implementing normatively preferable alternatives. Journal of Business Ethics, 76(2), 155–162.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Attig, N., El Ghoul, S., Guedhami, O., & Suh, J. (2013). Corporate social responsibility and credit ratings. Journal of Business Ethics, 117(4), 679–694.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barry, V., Issa, T., Catley, B., & Shaw, W. I. (2016). Moral issues in business. Melbourne: Cengage Learning Australia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bernstein, C. (2009). Green IT gains priority status. Baseline, 98, 15–15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carroll, A. B. (1991). The pyramid of corporate social responsibility: Toward the moral management of organizational stakeholders. Business Horizons, 34(4), 39–48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crowther, D., & Aras, G. (2008). Corporate social responsability. Copenhagen: Aras Güler & Ventus Publishing ApS.

    Google Scholar 

  • Datta, A., Roy, S., & Tarafdar, M. (2010). Adoption of sustainability in IT services: Role of IT service providers. Paper presented at the Americas Conference on Information Systems (AMCIS) 2010, Lima, Peru.

    Google Scholar 

  • Forte, A. (2013). Corporate social responsibility in the United States and Europe: How important is it? The future of corporate social responsibility. The International Business & Economics Research Journal (Online), 12(7), 815–824.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilbert, T. (2006). Mixed methods and mixed methodologies – The practical, the technical and the political. Journal of Research in Nursing, 11(3), 205–217.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harrison, R., & Reilly, T. (2011). Mixed methods designs in marketing research. Qualitative Market Research: An International Journal, 14(1), 7–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Issa, T., & Isaias, P. (2015). Sustainable design HCI, usability and environmental concerns. London: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Issa, T., Issa, T., & Chang, V. (2014). Sustainability and Green IT education practice for incorporating into the Australian higher education curriculum. The International Journal of Sustainability Education, 9(2), 21–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jagers, N. (2009). Bringing corporate social responsibility to the world trade organisation. In D. McBarnet, A. Voiculescu, & T. Campbell (Eds.), The new corporate accountability – Corporate social responsibility and the law (pp. 177–206). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kendall, K., & Kendall, J. (2010). Forms of government and systemic sustainability: A positive design approach to the design of information systems. Advances in Appreciative Inquiry, 3, 137–155.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maudsley, G. (2011). Mixing it but not mixed-up: Mixed methods research in medical education (a critical narrative review). Medical Teacher, 33(2), 92–104.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moscardo, G., Lamberton, G., Wells, G., Fallon, W., Lawn, P., Rowe, A., et al. (2013). Sustainability in Australian business: Principles and practice. Brisbane: Wiley-Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Murugesan, S., & Laplante, P. (2011). IT for a greener planet. IT Pro, 13, 16–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nathan, L., Belvis, E., Friedman, B., Hasbrouck, J., & Sengers, P. (2008). Beyond the hype: Sustainability and HCI. Paper presented at the CHI 2008, Italy.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nidumolu, R., Prahalad, C. K., & Rangaswami, M. R. (2009). Why sustainability is now the key driver of innovation. Harvard Business Review, 87(9), 57–64.

    Google Scholar 

  • Orlitzky, M., Siegel, D., & Waldman, D. (2011). Strategic corporate social responsibility and environmental sustainability. Business and Society, 50(1), 6–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Orsato, R. J. (2009). Sustainability strategies: When does it pay to be green? New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Rangan, K., Chase, L. A., & Karim, S. (2012). Why every company needs a CSR strategy and how to build it. Retrieved June 21, 2017, from http://www.hbs.edu/faculty/Publication%20Files/12-088.pdf

  • Reynolds, M. A., & Yuthas, K. (2008). Moral discourse and corporate social responsibility reporting. Journal of Business Ethics, 78, 47–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rivero, A. R. G., & Daim, T. (2017). Technology roadmap: Cattle farming sustainability in Germany. Journal of Cleaner Production, 142, 4310–4326.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schrempf-Stirling, J., Palazzo, G., & Phillips, R. A. (2016). Historic corporate social responsibility. Academy of Management Review, 41(4), 700–719.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sharma, A., Lyer, G., Mehrotra, A., & Krishnan, R. (2010). Sustainability and business-to-business marketing: A framework and implications. Industrial Marketing Management, 39, 330–341.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shaw, G., Walters, R., Kumar, A., & Sprigg, A. (2015). Sustainability in infrastructure asset management. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the 7th World Congress on Engineering Asset Management (WCEAM 2012).

    Google Scholar 

  • Sikdar, S. K., Sengupta, D., & Mukherjee, R. (2017). Sustainability measurement for technology and business systems: Use of currently available tools for quantification measuring progress towards sustainability (pp. 93–127). Basel: Springer International Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, P., & Sharicz, C. (2011). The shift needed for sustainability. The Learning Organization, 18(1), 73–86.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Steckstor, D. (2012). The effects of cause-related marketing on customers’ attitudes and buying behavior. Weisbaden: Springer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Sturdevant, C. (2008). How Green IT measures up. eWeek, 25, 27–39.

    Google Scholar 

  • Teddlie, C., & Tashakkori, A. (2009). Foundations of mixed methods research – Integrating quantitative and qualitative approaches in the social and behavioral sciences. New York: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walck, C. (2009). Integrating sustainability into management education. Journal of Management Education, 33(3), 384–390.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weybrecht, G. (2010). The sustainable MBA – The manager’s guide to green business England. Chichester: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wiggins, B. (2011). Confronting the dilemma of mixed Methods. Journal of Theoretical and Philosophical Psychology, 31(1), 44–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xiao, Y., Faff, R., & Gharghori, P. (2013). An empirical study of the world price of sustainability. Journal of Business Ethics, 114, 297–310.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Tomayess Issa .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Issa, T., Issa, T. (2019). CSR, Sustainability and Green IT in Higher Education: An Australian Perspective. In: Capaldi, N., Idowu, S.O., Schmidpeter, R., Brueckner, M. (eds) Responsible Business in Uncertain Times and for a Sustainable Future. CSR, Sustainability, Ethics & Governance. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-11217-2_4

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics