Skip to main content

The Conditional Probability Interpretation of Time: The Case of Interacting Clocks

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Detectors, Reference Frames, and Time

Part of the book series: Springer Theses ((Springer Theses))

Abstract

This chapter generalizes the conditional probability interpretation of time in which time evolution is realized through entanglement between a clock and a system of interest. This formalism is based upon conditioning a solution to the Wheeler-DeWitt equation on a subsystem of the Universe, serving as a clock, being in a state corresponding to a time t. Doing so assigns a conditional state to the rest of the Universe |ψ S(t)〉, referred to as the system. It is shown that when the total Hamiltonian appearing in the Wheeler-DeWitt equation contains an interaction term coupling the clock and system, the conditional state |ψ S(t)〉 satisfies a time-nonlocal Schrödinger equation in which the system Hamiltonian is replaced with a self-adjoint integral operator.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    The Schrödinger equation is replaced with a master equation, which induces decoherence.

  2. 2.

    We should emphasize this is a choice of inner product and normalization of the physical states, which may severely reduce the size of the physical Hilbert space. Furthermore, it may not be necessary to preserve the probabilistic interpretation of the system state. For example, the probabilistic interpretation may only be applicable in some limit, and it is the task of the physicist to explain how this limit comes about. To quote DeWitt on this point [4, 15]:

    …one learns that time and probability are phenomenological concepts.

    And Kiefer’s clarification of DeWitt’s statement [15]:

    The reference to probability refers to the ‘Hilbert-space’, problem, which is intimately connected with the ‘problem of time’. If time is absent, the notion of a probability conserved in time does not make much sense; the traditional Hilbert-space structure was designed to implement the probability interpretation, and its fate in a timeless world thus remains open.

  3. 3.

    A proof of this can be found on pages 197–198 of [26].

References

  1. S.D. Bartlett, T. Rudolph, R.W. Spekkens, Reference frames, superselection rules, and quantum information. Rev. Mod. Phys. 79, 555 (2007)

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  2. K.L.H. Bryan, A.J.M. Medved, Realistic clocks for a universe without time (2017). arXiv:quant-ph/1706.02531

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  3. V. Corbin, N.J. Cornish, Semi-classical limit and minimum decoherence in the conditional probability interpretation of quantum mechanics. Found. Phys. 39, 474 (2009)

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  4. B.S. DeWitt, The quantum and gravity: the Wheeler-DeWitt equation, in The Eighth Marcel Grossmann Meeting, ed. by T. Piran, R. Ruffini (World Scientific, Singapore, 1999), pp. 6–25

    Google Scholar 

  5. P.A.M. Dirac, Homogeneous variables in classical dynamics. Proc. Camb. Philos. Soc. 29, 389 (1933)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  6. P.A.M. Dirac, Lectures on Quantum Mechanics (Belfer Graduate School of Sciencem Yeshiva University, New York, 1964)

    Google Scholar 

  7. C.E. Dolby, The conditional probability interpretation of the Hamiltonian constraint (2004). arXiv:gr-qc/0406034

    Google Scholar 

  8. Hilbert-Schmidt operator. Encyclopedia of Mathematics. http://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/index.php?title=Hilbert-Schmidt_operator&oldid=22575

  9. R. Gambini, R.A. Porto, J. Pullin, A relational solution to the problem of time in quantum mechanics and quantum gravity: a fundamental mechanism for quantum decoherence. New J. Phys. 6, 45 (2004)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  10. R. Gambini, R.A. Porto, J. Pullin, Loss of quantum coherence from discrete quantum gravity. Classical Quantum Gravity 21, 51 (2004)

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  11. R. Gambini, R.A. Porto, J. Pullin, Realistic clocks, universal decoherence, and the block hole information paradox. Phys. Rev. Lett. 93, 24041 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. R. Gambini, R.A. Porto, S. Torterolo, J. Pullin, Conditional probabilities with Dirac observables and the problem of time in quantum gravity. Phys. Rev. D 79, 041501 (2009)

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  13. V. Giovannetti, S. Lloyd, L. Maccone, Quantum time. Phys. Rev. D 79, 945933 (2015)

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  14. C.J. Isham, Canonical quantum gravity and the problem of time, in Integrable Systems, Quantum Groups, and Quantum Field Theories, ed. by L.A. Ibort, M.A. Rodríguez. NATO ASI Series (Springer, Dordrecht, 1992)

    Google Scholar 

  15. C. Kiefer, Quantum Gravity, 3rd edn. (Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2012)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  16. K.V. Kuchař, Time and interpretations of quantum gravity. Int. J. Mod. Phys. D 20, 3 (2011)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  17. J. Leon, L. Maccone, The Pauli objection. Found. Phys. 47, 1597 (2017)

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  18. C. Marletto, V. Vedral, Evolution without evolution, and without ambiguities. Phys. Rev. D 95, 043510 (2017)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  19. E. Moreva, G. Brida, M. Gramegna, V. Giovannetti, L. Maccone, M. Genovese, Time from quantum entanglement: an experimental illustration. Phys. Rev. A 89, 052122 (2014)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  20. D.N. Page, Time as an inaccessible observable, NSF-ITP-89-18, 1989

    Google Scholar 

  21. D.N. Page, Clock time and entropy, in Physical Origins of Time Asymmetry, ed. by J.J. Halliwell, J. Pérez-Mercader, W.H. Zurek (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1994)

    Google Scholar 

  22. D.N. Page, W.K. Wootters, Evolution without evolution: dynamics described by stationary observables. Phys. Rev. D 27, 2885 (1983)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  23. A. Peres, Quantum Theory: Concepts and Methods (Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, 1995)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  24. C. Rovelli, Quantum Gravity (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2004)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  25. W.K. Wootters, “Time” replaced by quantum correlations. Int. J. Theor. Phys. 23, 701 (1984)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  26. K. Yosida, Functional Analysis, 4th edn. (Springer, Berlin, 1980)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Smith, A.R.H. (2019). The Conditional Probability Interpretation of Time: The Case of Interacting Clocks. In: Detectors, Reference Frames, and Time. Springer Theses. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-11000-0_8

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics