Skip to main content

Conclusion: Systemic Leadership as Design for Adaptive Social Learning

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Systemic Leadership for Local Governance
  • 245 Accesses

Abstract

Familial identity. The previously identified facets of systemic leadership are summarised, which could create the foundation for an expansive, adaptive approach. To do justice to human resource, an approach is needed which is creative and exploratory, not only mechanistic. This need not be invented, being synergistically drawn from past human endeavour which already recognises the limitations of more usual modes of thinking. A concluding discussion is based on phronesis and pragmatism as the leadership of inter-disciplinary social learning. Systems Science could ‘unlock doors’ to thinking differently, in which theory and practice are one dynamic strand. Developing a familial identity for a range of facilitative complexity, systems thinking and Operational Research approaches as systemic design for adaptive social learning may help to define a way of building the capacity to lead systemically in local governance, thus helping with the seismic shift from a service-led model of local government to a systemic-deliberative model of local governance, with the role of service design for the public good following on from that form of deliberation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 79.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Bibliography

  • Ackoff, R. L. (2006). Why Few Organizations Adopt Systems Thinking. Systems Research and Behavioral Science, 23(5), 705–708.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alford, J., & Hughes, O. (2008). Public Value Pragmatism as the Next Phase of Public Management. The American Review of Public Administration, 38(2), 130–148.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ansell, C. (2011). Pragmatist Democracy. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ansell, C., & Torfing, J. (Eds.). (2016). Handbook on Theories of Governance. Cheltenham, UK and Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Benington, J., & Moore, M. H. (Eds.). (2010). Public Value: Theory and Practice. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bichard, M. (2013). Editorial: The Need for a Public Service Strategy. Public Money & Management, 33(1), 3–4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, L. (Ed.). (2009). Aristotle: The Nicomachean Ethics (1st ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Busch, T. W. (Ed.). (1987). The Participant Perspective (1st ed.). Lanham, MD: University Press of America.

    Google Scholar 

  • Capra, F. (1997). The Web of Life: A New Scientific Understanding of Living Systems. London: Flamingo, HarperCollins.

    Google Scholar 

  • Checkland, P., & Scholes, P. (1990). Soft Systems Methodology in Action. Chichester, UK: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Churchman, C. W. (1970). Operations Research as a Profession. Management Science, 17(2), B-37–B-53.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dunn, E. S. (1971). Economic and Social Development: A Process of Social Learning. Baltimore and London: The John Hopkins Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eikeland, O. (2007). From Epistemology to Gnoseology—Understanding the Knowledge Claims of Action Research. Management Research News, 30(5), 344–358.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Engeström, Y. (1999). Learning by Expanding: Ten Years After (F. Seeger, Trans.). Lernen Durch Expansion. Marburg, Germany: BdWi-Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Festenstein, M. (2014). Dewey’s Political Philosophy. The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Retrieved September 14, 2015, from http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2014/entries/dewey-political/.

  • Flyvbjerg, B. (2014). What Is Phronetic Planning Research? What Is Phronetic Social Science? Retrieved September 2014, from http://flyvbjerg.plan.aau.dk/whatisphronetic.php.

  • Grint, K. (2010). Leadership: A Very Short Introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hobbs, C. (2016). Tapping the Resource Within? Exploring a Learning Pathway for Systemic Leadership Within Local Governance Networks. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. Ph.D. Systems Science, University of Hull, Hull, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hood, C. (1991). A Public Management for All Seasons? Public Administration, 69(1), 3–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hood, C., & Peters, G. (2004). The Middle Aging of New Public Management: Into the Age of Paradox? Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 14(3), 267–282.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hookway, C. (2015). Pragmatism. The Stanford Encycopedia of Philosophy. Retrieved October 7, 2015, from http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2015/entries/pragmatism/.

  • Jackson, M. C. (2003). Systems Thinking: Creative Holism for Managers. Chichester, UK: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lawlor, L. (2014). Jacques Derrida. The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Retrieved July 28, 2014, from http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2014/entries/derrida/.

  • MacIntyre, A. (2013). After Virtue. London: Bloomsbury.

    Google Scholar 

  • McChrystal, S., Collins, T., Silverman, D., & Fussell, C. (2015). Team of Teams: New Rules of Engagement for a Complex World. New York, UK: Portfolio Penguin, Random House.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morris, D., & Shapiro, I. (Eds.). (1993). John Dewey: The Political Writings (1st ed.). Indianapolis and Cambridge: Hackett Publishing Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Observatory of Public Sector Innovation. (2017). Working with Change: Systems Approaches to Public Sector Challenges. Paris: OECD.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sabatier, P. A., & Weible, C. M. (Eds.). (2014). Theories of the Policy Process (3rd ed.). Boulder, CO: Westview Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stacey, R. D., & Mowles, C. (2015). Strategic Management and Organisational Dynamics: The Challenge of Complexity to Ways of Thinking About Organisations (7th ed.). Harlow, England: Pearson Education Limited.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strijbos, S. (1995). How Can Systems Thinking Help Us in Bridging the Gap Between Science and Wisdom? Systems Practice, 8(4), 361–376.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Williams, P. (2012). Collaboration in Public Policy and Practice: Perspectives on Boundary Spanners. Bristol, England: The Policy Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Catherine Hobbs .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Hobbs, C. (2019). Conclusion: Systemic Leadership as Design for Adaptive Social Learning. In: Systemic Leadership for Local Governance. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-08280-2_9

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics