Skip to main content

Quantitative X-Ray Diffraction Study into Bauxite Residue Mineralogical Phases

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Light Metals 2019

Part of the book series: The Minerals, Metals & Materials Series ((MMMS))

Abstract

Over 100 million tonnes of bauxite residue is produced annually as a by-product of the Bayer process. Bauxite residue utilisation represents both a challenge and an opportunity for the alumina industry. Bauxite residue is a fine-grained, complex mixture of numerous mineral phases, which varies based on refinery operating conditions and bauxite ore. Quantitative X-ray diffraction by Rietveld refinement was used to characterise several industrially sourced residues and better understand the potential value and risk in this material. Particular emphasis was placed on characterisation of aluminium bearing phases to identify opportunities for process optimisation and residue utilisation. Analysis revealed that a significant proportion, up to 66%, of the total aluminium in some residues can be hosted within iron oxides via solid solution.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 299.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 449.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. International Aluminium Institute, Bauxite residue management: Best practice. 2015.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Power, G., M. Gräfe, and C. Klauber, Bauxite residue issues: I. Current management, disposal and storage practices. Hydrometallurgy, 2011. 108(1): p. 33–45.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Santini, T.C. and M.V. Fey, From tailings to soil: long-term effects of amendments on progress and trajectory of soil formation and in situ remediation in bauxite residue. Journal of Soils and Sediments, 2018. 18(5): p. 1935–1949.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Evans, K., Successes and challenges in the management and use of bauxite residue, in Bauxite residue valorisation and best practices. 2015: Leuven. p. 113–128.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Santini, T.C. and M.V. Fey, Fly ash as a permeable cap for tailings management: pedogenesis in bauxite residue tailings. Journal of Soils and Sediments, 2015. 15(3): p. 552–564.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Cheary, R.W. and A. Coelho, A fundamental parameters approach to X-ray line-profile fitting. Journal of Applied Crystallography, 1992. 25(2): p. 109–121.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Hill, R.J. and C.J. Howard, Quantitative phase analysis from neutron powder diffraction data using the Rietveld method. Journal of Applied Crystallography, 1987. 20(6): p. 467–474.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Whittington, B. and T. Fallows, Formation of lime-containing desilication product (DSP) in the Bayer process: factors influencing the laboratory modelling of DSP formation. Hydrometallurgy, 1997. 45(3): p. 289–303.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Schulze, D.G. and U. Schwertmann, The influence of aluminium on iron oxides: X. Properties of Al-substituted goethites. Clay Minerals, 1984. 19(4): p. 521–539.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Trolard, F. and Y. Tardy, The stabilities of gibbsite, boehmite, aluminous goethites and aluminous hematites in bauxites, ferricretes and laterites as a function of water activity, temperature and particle size. Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta, 1987. 51(4): p. 945–957.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Li, D., et al., Mineralogy of Al-substituted goethites. Powder Diffraction, 2006. 21(4): p. 289–299.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Neumann, R., A.N. Avelar, and G.M. da Costa, Refinement of the isomorphic substitutions in goethite and hematite by the Rietveld method, and relevance to bauxite characterisation and processing. Minerals Engineering, 2014. 55: p. 80–86.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Schwertmann, U. and L. Carlson, Aluminum influence on iron oxides: XVII. Unit-cell parameters and aluminum substitution of natural goethites. Soil Science Society of America Journal, 1994. 58(1): p. 256–261.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Wu, F., Aluminous goethite in the bayer process and its impact on alumina recovery and settling, in Department of Chemistry. 2012, Curtin University.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Li, W., et al., Mechanisms on the morphology variation of hematite crystals by Al substitution: The modification of Fe and O reticular densities. Scientific Reports, 2016. 6: p. 35960.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Dunyushkina, L.A. and V.A. Gorbunov, Effect of crystal structure on the electrical properties of CaTi1 – xFexO3. Inorganic Materials, 2001. 37(11): p. 1165–1169.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Riley, G., et al., Plant Impurity Balances and Inclusion in DSP, in Fifth International Alumina Quality Workshop. 1999, AQW Incorporated: Bunbury, Western Australia. p. 404–414.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Vogrin, J., et al., Characterisation and steps toward structure solution of synthetic anion-substituted desilication products, in Alumina 2018. 2018: Gladstone, Australia. p. 233–240.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Balassone, G., et al., Sodalite-group minerals from the Somma – Vesuvius volcanic complex, Italy: a case study of K-feldspar-rich xenoliths. Mineralogical Magazine, 2012. 76(1): p. 191–212.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Kanepit, V.N. and E.É. Rieder, Neutron diffraction study of cancrinite. Journal of Structural Chemistry, 1995. 36(4): p. 694–696.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Peng, H., et al., Advanced characterisation of bauxite residue, in Alumina 2018. 2018: Gladstone, Australia. p. 189–195.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Li, G., et al., Beneficiation of high-aluminium-content hematite ore by soda ash roasting. Mineral Processing and Extractive Metallurgy Review, 2010. 31(3): p. 150–164.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Qi, T., et al., A review of the bauxite residue sinter-leach process, in Alumina 2018. 2018: Gladstone, Australia. p. 181–188.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors acknowledge the funding provided by the Alumina Quality Workshop (AQW Inc.) postgraduate scholarship. This research was supported by funding from ARC Linkage project LP160100207 and the International Aluminium Institute. This research was undertaken on the Powder Diffraction (10BM1) beamline at the Australian Synchrotron, part of ANSTO. This research was also undertaken on the Powder Diffraction (BL14B1) beamline at the Shanghai Synchrotron Radiation Facility.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to John Vogrin .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 The Minerals, Metals & Materials Society

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Vogrin, J., Hodge, H., Santini, T., Peng, H., Vaughan, J. (2019). Quantitative X-Ray Diffraction Study into Bauxite Residue Mineralogical Phases. In: Chesonis, C. (eds) Light Metals 2019. The Minerals, Metals & Materials Series. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-05864-7_13

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics