Skip to main content

Intelligentsia as a Liberal Concept in Soviet History, 1945–1991

  • Chapter
Dimensions and Challenges of Russian Liberalism

Part of the book series: Philosophy and Politics - Critical Explorations ((PPCE,volume 8))

Abstract

There was no liberalism as a consistent political and intellectual movement in Soviet history; it was destroyed by the Russian revolution and the Bolshevik terror. During the Cold War scores of Western observers searched for “liberals” in Soviet society. Instead, they found the intelligentsia, which remained—in the period after Stalin’s death—a remarkably tenacious collective subject that embodied real and imagined liberal, as well as socialist, qualities. This chapter explores these main qualities, as well as the structures of Soviet life and experience that maintained them. The core mission of the intelligentsia was to transcend the state and society created under Joseph Stalin to create “socialism with a human face” based on intellectual and cultural freedoms, but without capitalism. In 1968 this concept was smashed by the Soviet invasion of Czechoslovakia. It resurfaced in Gorbachev’s perestroika two decades later. The chapter argues that intelligentsia’s aspirations helped Gorbachev’s reforms take a democratic and liberal turn, and perhaps even blocked an authoritarian alternative. At the same time, the beliefs and choices of the Soviet intelligentsia contributed to the rapid collapse of the Soviet economic system and state. Both the intelligentsia and its “liberalism” perished under the rubble.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 99.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Many points in this chapter build on my previously-published works. See Vladislav Zubok, Zhivago’s Children: The Last Russian Intelligentsia (Cambridge, MA: The Belknap Press, 2009) and Vladislav Zubok, The Idea of Russia: The Life and Work of Dmitry Likhachev (London: I.B. Tauris, 2017).

  2. 2.

    Elena Zubkova, Russia After the War: Hopes, Illusions, and Disappointments, 1945–1957 (London–New York: Routledge, 1998).

  3. 3.

    Donald A. Filtzer, The Khrushchev Era: De-Stalinization and the Limits of Reform in the USSR, 1953–1964 (Basingstoke: Macmillan, 1993); William Taubman, Khrushchev: The Man and His Era (London–New York: Free Press–W.W. Norton, 2003); Miriam Dobson, “The Post-Stalin era: De-Stalinization, Daily Life, and Dissent”, Kritika 12, no. 4, 2011, pp. 905–924.

  4. 4.

    Julian Fuerst, Polly Jones, and Susan Morrissey, “The Relaunch of the Soviet Project, 1945–1964: Introduction”, The Slavonic and East European Review 86, no. 2, 2013, pp. 201–207; Polly Jones (ed.), The Dilemmas of De-Stalinisation: Negotiating Cultural and Social Change in the Khrushchev Era (New York–London: Routledge, 2006).

  5. 5.

    Priscilla Johnson, Khrushchev and the Arts: The Politics of Soviet Culture, 1962–1964 (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1965); Denis Kozlov, The Readers of Novyi Mir: Coming to Terms with the Stalinist Past (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2013).

  6. 6.

    Peter Vail and Aleksandr Ghenis, 60–e. Mir sovetskogo cheloveka (Moskva: AST, 2014); Mark Lipovetsky, “The Poetics of the ITR Discourse: In the 1960s and Today”, Ab Imperio 1, 2013.

  7. 7.

    Vladimir Shlapentokh, Strakh i druzhba v nashem totalitarnom proshlom (St. Petersburg: Zvezda, 2003).

  8. 8.

    See Ilya Kukulin, “Alternativnoie sotsialnoie proiektirovaniie v sovetskom obshchestve 1960–1970-kh godov”, Novoie literaturnoie obozrenie 88, 2007, pp. 169–201.

  9. 9.

    Lipovetsky , “The Poetics of the ITR discourse”, p. 116.

  10. 10.

    Zubok , “Zhivago’s Children”, pp. 285–286. See also Andrei Sakharov, Progress, Coexistence and Intellectual Freedom, Sakharov Center (http://www.sakharov-center.ru/asfconf2011/english/articleseng/1).

  11. 11.

    Zubok , “Zhivago’s Children”, p. 282–283.

  12. 12.

    Alexander Tvardovsky’s entry in his diary for 10 August 1968. See: Alexander Tvardovsky, “Rabochie tetradi”, Znamia 9, 2003, pp. 142–143.

  13. 13.

    Vladimir Kormer, Dvoinoe soznanie intelligentsii i psevdokul’tura (Moskva: Traditsya, 1997).

  14. 14.

    On this movement, see Benjamin Nathans, “The Dictatorship of Reason: Aleksandr Vol’pin and the Idea of Rights under Developed Socialism”, Slavic Review 66, no. 4, 2007, pp. 630–663.

  15. 15.

    Zubok , “The Idea of Russia”, p. 118.

  16. 16.

    On Gorbachev and his connection to the cultural and liberalizing trends of the early periods, see Robert English, Russia and the Idea of the West: Gorbachev, Intellectuals and the End of the Cold War (New York: Columbia University Press, 2000); William Taubman, Gorbachev : His Life and Times (New York: Simon and Schuster, 2017).

  17. 17.

    Steven L. Solnick, Stealing the State: Control and Collapse in Soviet Institutions (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1998); Stephen Kotkin, Armageddon Averted: The Soviet Collapse 1970–2000 (New York: Oxford University Press, 2001); Rudolf G. Pikhoia, “Vlast. Nomenklatura. Sobstvennost. Ob odnoi iz prichin raspada SSSR”, in Zapiski Arkheografa (Moskva: Universitet Dmitriia Pozharskogo, 2016), pp. 384–400.

  18. 18.

    Vasily Akesenov, “Novyy sladostnyy stil’“, Znamia 5, 1997, p. 152.

  19. 19.

    For discussion of the reformability of the Soviet system, see Stephen F. Cohen, “Was the Soviet System Reformable?”, Slavic Review 63, no. 3, 2004, pp. 459–488; Vladislav Zubok, “The Soviet Union and China in the 1980s: Reconciliation and Divorce”, Cold War History 17, no. 2, Spring 2017, pp. 121–141.

  20. 20.

    Alexei Yurchak, “Soviet Hegemony of Forms: Everything Was Forever, Until It Was No More”, Comparative Studies in Society and History 45, no. 3, 2003, pp. 480–510; Alexei Yurchak, Everything Was Forever, Until It Was No More: The Last Soviet Generation (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2005).

  21. 21.

    See David Kotz and Fred Weir, Revolution from Above: The Demise of the Soviet System (London–New York: Routledge, 1997); Peter Reddaway and Dmitri Glinsky, The Tragedy of Russia’s Reforms: Market Bolshevism Against Democracy (Washington, DC: United States Institute of Peace Press, 2001), Steven Kotkin and Jan Gross, Uncivil Society: 1989 and the Implosion of Communist Establishment (New York: Modern Library, 2010).

  22. 22.

    Anatoly Chernyaev, Sovmestnyi iskhod. Dnevnik dvukh epoch. 1972–1991 gody (Moskva: ROSSPEN, 2008), pp. 887, 891, 919.

  23. 23.

    The author’s conversation with Michael Ellman on 23 October 2017 in Berlin.

  24. 24.

    See among many sources on this Arkady Ostrovsky, The Invention of Russia: The Journey from Gorbachev’s Freedom to Putin’s War (London: Atlantic Books, 2015).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Vladislav Zubok .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Zubok, V. (2019). Intelligentsia as a Liberal Concept in Soviet History, 1945–1991. In: Cucciolla, R.M. (eds) Dimensions and Challenges of Russian Liberalism. Philosophy and Politics - Critical Explorations, vol 8. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-05784-8_4

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics