Skip to main content

Measurement Uncertainty Cannot Always Be Calculated

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Uncertainty Modeling for Engineering Applications

Part of the book series: PoliTO Springer Series ((PTSS))

  • 455 Accesses

Abstract

The goal of this chapter is to stimulate reflections concerning calculation of measurement uncertainty. One basic question is here addressed: Is it always possible to calculate measurement uncertainty? In order to answer this question the conditions that should be met in order to calculate measurement uncertainty are briefly reviewed. Further, it is here provided an example related to a worldwide known and applied electromagnetic compatibility test method for which measurement uncertainty could not be calculated until a recent maintenance of the relevant standard. Calculation of measurement uncertainty for the new test method is here carried out in order to highlight the effectiveness of the improvement of the relevant standard.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Conformity Assessment—general requirements for the competence of testing and calibration laboratories, ISO/IEC 17025:2017

    Google Scholar 

  2. Vehicles, boats and internal combustion engines—radio disturbance characteristics—limits and methods of measurement for the protection of on-board receivers, CISPR 25, 3rd ed., 2008

    Google Scholar 

  3. Vehicles, boats and internal combustion engines—Radio disturbance characteristics—Limits and methods of measurement for the protection of on-board receivers, CISPR 25, 4th ed., 2016

    Google Scholar 

  4. BIPM, IEC, IFCC, ILAC, ISO, IUPAC, IUPAP and OIML (2008) Guide to the expression of uncertainty in measurement, JCGM 100:2008, GUM 1995 with minor corrections

    Google Scholar 

  5. BIPM, IEC, IFCC, ILAC, ISO, IUPAC, IUPAP and OIML (2008) Supplement 1 to the ‘Guide to the expression of uncertainty in measurement’—propagation of distributions using a Monte Carlo method JCGM 101:2008

    Google Scholar 

  6. Specification for radio disturbance and immunity measuring apparatus and methods—part 4-2: uncertainties, statistics and limit modeling—uncertainty in EMC measurements, CISPR 16-4-2, 2nd ed., 2008

    Google Scholar 

  7. Statistical methods for use in proficiency testing by interlaboratory comparison, ISO 13528:2016

    Google Scholar 

  8. NIST uncertainty machine. https://uncertainty.nist.gov/

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Carlo F. M. Carobbi .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Carobbi, C.F.M. (2019). Measurement Uncertainty Cannot Always Be Calculated. In: Canavero, F. (eds) Uncertainty Modeling for Engineering Applications. PoliTO Springer Series. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-04870-9_11

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics