Abstract
This squib begins with an argument emphasizing that the grammar of English makes a distinction between constituents that are focused and those that are merely new, hence not given. If the distinction is made via features, we need two features: one indicating focus and one indicating either given or new information. Which one of the two? Semantically, the choice doesn’t matter: whatever information is given is not new and the other way round. For the phonology, there is a difference, however. If the prosody of all-new constituents is default prosody, but the prosody of given constituents is special, we would want to indicate givenness, rather than newness.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Beaver, D., & Velleman, D. (2011). The communicative significance of primary and secondary accents. Lingua, 121, 1671–1692.
Fanselow, G. (2012). Scrambling as formal movement. In I. Kučerová & A. Neeleman (Eds.), Contrasts and positions in information structure (pp. 267–295). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Fanselow, G. (2016). Syntactic and prosodic reflexes of information structure in Germanic. In C. Féry & S. Ishihara (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of information structure (pp. 621–641). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Féry, C., & Samek-Lodovici, V. (2006). Focus projection and prosodic prominence in nested foci. Language, 82, 131–150.
Katz, J., & Selkirk, E. (2011). Contrastive focus vs. discourse-new: Evidence from phonetic prominence in English. Language, 87, 771–816.
Kučerová, I. (2012). Grammatical marking of givenness. Natural Language Semantics, 20, 1–30.
Rochemont, M. (2016). Givenness. In C. Féry & S. Ishihara (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of information structure (pp. 41–63). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Schwarzschild, R. (1999). GIVENness, AvoidF and other constraints on the placement of focus. Natural Language Semantics, 7, 141–177.
Schwarzschild, R. (2004). Focus interpretations: Comments on Geurts and van der Sandt. Theoretical Linguistics, 30, 137–140.
Schwarzschild, R. (2018). 5 minutes on focus. Paper Presented at Semantics 2018: Looking Ahead, University of Massachusetts Amherst, 10 March 2018.
Selkirk, E. (2002). Contrastive FOCUS vs. presentational focus: Prosodic evidence from right node raising in English. Paper Presented to the Speech Prosody 2002: Proceedings of the First International Prosody Conference, Aix-en-Provence.
Selkirk, E. (2007). Contrastive focus, givenness, and the unmarked status of discourse-new. In C. Féry, G. Fanselow, & M. Krifka (Eds.), Interdisciplinary studies on information structure (pp. 125–145). Potsdam: Universitätsverlag Potsdam.
Selkirk, E. (2008). Contrastive focus, givenness, and the unmarked status of “discourse-new”. Acta Linguistica Hungarica, 55, 1–16.
Ĺ imĂk, R., & Wierzba, M. (2015). The role of givenness, presupposition, and prosody in Czech word order: An experimental study. Semantics and Pragmatics, 8(3), 1–103.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Kratzer, A., Selkirk, E. (2019). New vs. Given. In: Altshuler, D., Rett, J. (eds) The Semantics of Plurals, Focus, Degrees, and Times. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-04438-1_8
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-04438-1_8
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-04437-4
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-04438-1
eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)