Skip to main content

Abstract

In this preface, we introduce Roger Schwarzschild’s body of work, as well as the papers in this volume. Because Roger’s work is so diverse and comprehensive, the book is divided into four categories: papers that address the semantics of nouns and plurals; papers on focus semantics; papers on degree semantics; and papers addressing the semantics of tense and aspect. We end with compelling arguments that Roger is the best.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Altshuler, D. & Schwarzschild, R. (2012). Moment of change, cessation implicatures and simultaneous readings. In E. Chemla, V. H. & Winterstein, G. (Eds.), Proceedings of Sinn und Bedeutung 17, (pp. 45–62).

    Google Scholar 

  • Altshuler, D. & Schwarzschild, R. (2013). Correlating cessation with double access. In M. Aloni, M. F. & Roelofsen, F. (Eds.), Proceedings of the 19th Amsterdam Colloquium, (pp. 43–50).

    Google Scholar 

  • Altshuler, D. (2016). Events, states and times. An essay on narrative discourse in English. Berlin/Warsaw: de Gruyter. Open Access, Retrieved from https://www.degruyter.com/view/product/474350.

  • Bach, E. (1986). The algebra of events. Linguistics and Philosophy, 9, 5–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barwise, J. (1981). Scenes and other situations. The Journal of Philosophy, 78, 369–397.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beaver, D., & Velleman, D. (2011). The communicative significance of primary and secondary accents. Lingua, 121, 1671–1692.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beck, S., & Vasishth, S. (2009). Multiple Focus. Journal of Semantics, 26, 159–184.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bhatt, R., & Takahashi, S. (2011). Reduced and unreduced phrasal comparatives. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, 29, 581–620.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blutner, R., & Zeevat, H. (2003). Optimality theory and pragmatics. Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carlson, G. (1977). Reference to kinds in English. Ph.D. thesis, University of Massachusetts, Amherst.

    Google Scholar 

  • Champollion, L. (2017). Parts of a whole: Distributivity as a bridge between aspect and measurement. Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chierchia, G. (1998a). Plurality of mass nouns and the notion of ‘semantic parameter’. In S. Rothstein (Ed.), Events and grammar. Dordrecht: Kluwer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chierchia, G. (1998b). Reference to kinds across languages. Natural Language Semantics, 6, 339–405.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chierchia, G. (2013). Logic in grammar: Polarity, free choice, and intervention. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Cresswell, M. (1977). The semantics of degree. In B. Partee (Ed.), Montague grammar (pp. 261–292).

    Google Scholar 

  • Cresswell, M. (1978). Adverbs of space and time. In F. Guenthner & S. Schmidt (Eds.), Formal semantics and pragmatics for natural languages (pp. 135–179). Dordrecht/Boston: Reidel.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davidson, D. (1969). The individuation of events. In N. Rescher (Ed.), Essays in Honor of Carl G. Hempel (pp. 216–234). Reidel.

    Google Scholar 

  • Féry, C., & Ishihara, S. (2009). The phonology of second occurrence focus. Journal of Linguistics, 45, 285–313.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fox, D. (2007). Free choice and the theory of scalar implicatures. In U. Sauerland & P. Stateva (Eds.), Presupposition and implicature in compositional semantics (pp. 71–120). New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Grønn, A., & von Stechow, A. (2016). Tense. In M. Aloni & P. Dekker (Eds.), Handbook of formal semantics (pp. 313–341). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Heim, I. (2000). Degree operators and scope. In B. Jackson & T. Matthews (Eds.), Proceedings of Semantics and Linguistic Theory (Vol. 10, pp. 40–64). CLC Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heim, I. (2006). Remarks on comparative clauses as generalized quantifiers. MIT: Ms.

    Google Scholar 

  • Higginbotham, J. & Schein, B. (1989). Plurals. In J. Carter & R.-M. Déchaine (Eds.), Proceedings of the North Eastern Linguistics Society (NELS) (Vol. 19, pp. 161–175). Amherst, MA: GLSA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Iatridou, S., Anagnostopolou, E., & Izvorski, R. (2001). Observations about the form and meaning of the perfect. In M. Kenstowicz (Ed.), Ken Hale: A life in language (pp. 153–205). Cambridge: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jackendoff, R. (1972). Semantic interpretation in generative grammar. Cambridge/London: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kamp, H. (1980). Some remarks on the logic of change–Part I. In C. Rohrer (Ed.), Time tense and quantiers (pp. 135–179). Berlin: Max Niemeyer Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Katzir, R. (2013). A note on contrast. Natural Language Semanticss, 21, 333–343.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krifka, M. (1989). In R. Bartsch, J. van Bentham, & P. van Emde Boas (Eds.), Semantics and contextual expression (pp. 75–115). Foris.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krifka, M. (2004). Focus and/or context: A second look at second occurrence focus. In H. Kamp & B. H. Partee (Eds.), Context-dependence in the analysis of linguistic meaning, current research in the semantics/pragmatics interface (pp. 187–207). Elsevier.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krifka, M. (1990). Four thousand ships passed through the lock. Linguistics and Philosophy, 13, 487–520.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kripke, S. (1959). A completeness theorem in modal logic. Journal of Symbolic Logic, 24, 1–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Larson, R. (1987). “Missing prepositions” and the analysis of English free relative clauses. Linguistic Inquiry, 18, 239–266.

    Google Scholar 

  • Larson, R. (1988). Scope and comparatives. Linguistics and Philosophy, 11, 1–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li, X. (2015). Degreeless comparatives: the semantics of differential verb comparatives in Mandarin Chinese. Journal of Semantics, 32, 1–38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Link, G. (1987). Algebraic semantics of event structures. In M. S. J. Groenendijk & F. Veltman (Eds.), Proceedings of the Sixth Amsterdam Colloquium. Amsterdam: University of Amsterdam.

    Google Scholar 

  • Link, G. (1983). The logical analysis of plural and mass nouns: a lattice-theoretic approach. In R. Bäuerle, C. Schwarze, & A. von Stechow (Eds.), In meaning, use and interpretation of language (pp. 302–323). Berlin: De Gruyter.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parsons, T. (1990). Events in the semantics of English: A study in subatomic semantics. Cambridge, Massachusetts: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Partee, B. (1973). Some structural analogies between tenses and pronouns in English. Journal of Philosophy, 70, 601–609.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Partee, B. (1984). Nominal and temporal anaphora. Linguistics and Philosophy, 7, 243–286.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rawlins, K. (2013). On adverbs of space and time. In R. Marin, B. Gehrke, & B. Arsenijevic (Eds.), Studies in the composition and decomposition of event predicates (pp. 153–193). Dordrecht: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Schwarzschild, R. (1991). On the meaning of definite plural noun phrases. Ph.D. thesis, University of Massachusetts, Amherst.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwarzschild, R. (1992). Types of plural individuals. Linguistics and Philosophy, 15, 641–675.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schwarzschild, R. (1994). Plurals, presuppositions and the sources of distributivity. Natural Language Semantics, 2, 201–248.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schwarzschild, R. (1996). Pluralities. Kluwer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwarzschild, R. (1997). Why some foci must associate. Rutgers University: Ms.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwarzschild, R. (1999). GIVENness, AvoidF and other constraints on the placement of accent. Natural Language Semantics, 7, 141–177.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schwarzschild, R. (2002). Singleton indefinites. Journal of Semantics, 19, 289–314.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schwarzschild, R. (2004a). Focus interpretations: Comments on Geurts and van der Sandt (2004). Theoretical Linguistics, 30, 137–147.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwarzschild, R. (2004b). Scope-splitting in the comparative. Ms: Rutgers University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwarzschild, R. (2005). Measure phrases as modifiers of adjectives. Recherches Linguistiques de Vincennes, 34, 207–228.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schwarzschild, R. (2006). The role of dimensions in the syntax of noun phrases, 67–110.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwarzschild, R. (2008). The semantics of comparatives and other degree constructions. Language and Linguistics Compass, 2, 308–331.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schwarzschild, R. (2010). Comparative markers and standard markers. In M. Erlewine & Y. Sudo (Eds.), MITWPL 69: Proceedings of the MIT Workshop on Comparatives.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwarzschild, R. (2011). Stubborn distributivity, multiparticipant nouns and the count/mass distinction. In S. Lima, K. Mullin, & B. Smith (Eds.), Proceedings of the 39th Meeting of the North East Linguistic Society (NELS 39) (Vol. 2, pp. 661–678). Amherst, MA: GLSA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwarzschild, R. (2012). Directed scale segments. In A. Cherches (Ed.), Proceedings of Semantics and Linguistic Theory XXII (pp. 65–82). CLC Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwarzschild, R. (2013). Degrees and segments. In T. Snider (Ed.), Proceedings of Semantics and Linguistic Theory (Vol. 23, pp. 212–238).

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwarzschild, R. (2015). Partitives and duratives. Theoretical. Linguistics, 41, 197–209.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwarzschild, R. (2018). The Representation of Focus, Givenness and Exhaustivity. In I. Frana, P. Menndez-Benito, & R. Bhatt (Eds.), Festschrift for Angelika Krazter. Retrieved from https://scholarworks.umass.edu/ak_festsite.

  • Schwarzschild, R., & Wilkinson, K. (2002). Quantifiers in comparatives: A semantics of degree based on intervals. Natural Language Semantics, 10, 1–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Selkirk, E. (1984). Phonology and syntax: The relation between sound and structure. Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Selkirk, E. (1995). Sentence prosody: Intonation, stress, and phrasing. In J. A. Goldsmith (Ed.), The handbook of phonological theory (pp. 550–569). London: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Selkirk, E. (2002). Contrastive FOCUS vs. presentational focus: Prosodic evidence from right node raising in English. In Proceedings of the First International Prosody Conference.

    Google Scholar 

  • Selkirk, E. (2007). Contrastive focus, givenness, and the unmarked status of discourse-new. In G. F. C. Fery & M. Krifka (Eds.), Interdisciplinary studies on information structure (pp. 187–207). Potsdam: Universittsverlag Potsdam.

    Google Scholar 

  • Selkirk, E. (2008). Contrastive focus, givenness and the unmarked status of discourse-new. Acta Linguistica Hungarica, 55, 331–346.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stone, M. (1997). The anaphoric parallel between modality and tense. IRCS Report 97–06. University of Pennsylvania.

    Google Scholar 

  • Syrett, K. & Schwarzschild, R. (2009). The representation and processing of measure phrases by four-year-olds. Paper presented at the 34th Annual Boston University Conference on Language Development.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wagner, M. (2006). Givenness and locality. In M. Gibson & J. Howell (Eds.), Proceedings of Semantics and Linguistic Theory (Vol. 16, pp. 295–312). Ithaca: CLC Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wagner, M. (2012). Focus and givenness: A unified approach. In I. Kucerova & A. Neeleman (Eds.), Contrasts and positions in information structure (pp. 102–147). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Winter, Y., & Scha, R. (2015). Plurals. In S. Lappin & C. Fox (Eds.), The handbook of contemporary semantic theory (pp. 77–113).

    Google Scholar 

  • Zwarts, F. (1995). The semantics of relative position. In The Proceedings of Semantics and Linguistic Theory (Vol. 5, pp. 405–422). CLS Publications.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Daniel Altshuler .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Altshuler, D., Rett, J. (2019). Preface. In: Altshuler, D., Rett, J. (eds) The Semantics of Plurals, Focus, Degrees, and Times. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-04438-1_1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-04438-1_1

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-04437-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-04438-1

  • eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics