Skip to main content

Fragmentation and Shattering

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Generalized Statistical Thermodynamics

Abstract

Binary fragmentation is the reverse process of binary aggregation: a cluster with i monomers splits into two clusters with masses j and i − j such that 1 ≤ j ≤ i − 1. This is represented schematically by the irreversible mass-conserving reaction

$$\displaystyle {} (i) \xrightarrow {B_{i-j,j}} (i-j) + (j) . $$

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 149.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    There are n i clusters with mass i and each produces i − 1 ordered fragments (fragmentation events). The total number of fragmentation events is

    $$\displaystyle \begin{aligned} \sum_{i=1}^{\infty} (i-1)n_i = M-N . \end{aligned}$$
  2. 2.

    Equation (10.5) as written is for the offspring ensemble \(\mu \mathcal C(M,N)\). In the parent ensemble \(\mu \mathcal C(M,N-1)\), N must be replaced by N − 1.

  3. 3.

    Recall that Eq. (10.14) is written in the offspring ensemble \(\mu \mathcal C(M,N)\) while Eq. (10.39) is written in the parent ensemble \(\mu \mathcal C(M,N-1)\).

  4. 4.

    Notice that f(x)dx = ϕ(z)dz as an immediate consequence of Eq. (10.46).

  5. 5.

    The thermodynamic limit requires M to be large and N fixed. This condition ensures homogeneous behavior of ϕ at any N, even small N of the order 1. If we allow N to be large, but still much smaller than M, then we can treat \(\log \Omega \) as a continuous function of M and N to write \(\log \Omega = M\beta +N\log q\).

  6. 6.

    Here we work with the mean rather than the most probable distribution. For large M and N the two are equal to each other.

  7. 7.

    This scaling presumes that the cluster distribution is concentrated in a relatively narrow range of cluster masses.

  8. 8.

    Function A(M) is of no particular interest once \(\log \omega ^*({\bar z})\) has been determined.

  9. 9.

    The physical impossibility of zero mass is a consequence of the passage to continuous space. In discrete finite systems the smallest mass in scaled coordinates is finite and equal to 1∕M.

  10. 10.

    See McGrady and Ziff (1987), Singh and Hassan (1996), Ziff (1992), Ernst and Szamel (1993). These works study shattering by examining the kinetic equation for the mean distribution (our Eq. (10.44)) and the conditions under which it fails to preserve mass, a breakdown that identifies the presence of shattering.

References

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Appendix: Derivations

Appendix: Derivations

10.1.1 Equation (10.24)

Consider parent and offspring distributions for the fragmentation reaction

$$\displaystyle \begin{aligned} (i+j) \to (i) + (j) . \end{aligned}$$

Only the cluster masses involved in this reaction have different number of clusters in the parent and offspring distributions. Then we have

$$\displaystyle \begin{aligned} \begin{array}{rcl} \frac{\mathbf{n^\prime!}}{\mathbf{n!}} = \frac{(N-1)!}{N!} \frac{(n_i!) (n_j!) (n_{i+j}!)}{(n^{\prime}_i!) (n^{\prime}_j!) (n^{\prime}_{i+j}!)} = \frac{1}{N} \frac{(n_i!) (n_j!) (n^{\prime}_{i+j}-1)!}{(n_i-1!) (n^{\prime}_j-1)! (n^{\prime}_{i+j}!)} = \frac{1}{N} \frac{n_i n_j}{n^{\prime}_{i+j}} \end{array} \end{aligned} $$

where we have used the parent–offspring relationships with i ≠ j. Repeating with i = j, n i > 1:

$$\displaystyle \begin{aligned} \begin{array}{rcl} \frac{\mathbf{n^\prime!}}{\mathbf{n!}} =\frac{1}{N} \frac{(n_i!) (n_{2i})!}{(n^{\prime}_i!) (n^{\prime}_{2i})!} =\frac{1}{N} \frac{(n_i!) (n^{\prime}_{2i}-1)!}{(n_i-2)! (n^{\prime}_{2i})!} =\frac{1}{N} \frac{n_i (n_i-1)}{n^{\prime}_{2i}} \end{array} \end{aligned} $$

and we notice that we no longer need to specify n i > 1 since n i = 1 makes this ratio 0. The results can be summarized into a single expression as follows:

$$\displaystyle \begin{aligned} \frac{\mathbf{n^\prime!}}{\mathbf{n!}} = \frac{1}{N} \frac{n_i (n_j-\delta_{ij})}{n^{\prime}_{i+j}} \end{aligned} $$
(10.74)

which is Eq. (10.24) in the text.

10.1.2 Equation (10.44)

We start with Eq. (10.42)

$$\displaystyle \begin{aligned} \left\langle n_k \right\rangle &= \left\langle \sum_{i=2}^\infty\sum_{j=1}^{i-1} \mathcal P^{\prime}_{i-j,j} (n^{\prime}_k - \delta_{k,i} + \delta_{k,i-j} + \delta_{k,j}) \right\rangle \\ &=\left\langle \sum_{i=2}^\infty\sum_{j=1}^{i-1} P^{\prime}_{i-j,j} n^{\prime}_k \right\rangle -\left\langle \sum_{i=2}^\infty\sum_{j=1}^{i-1} P^{\prime}_{i-j,j}\delta_{i,k} \right\rangle \\ &\quad +\left\langle \sum_{i=2}^\infty\sum_{j=1}^{i-1} P^{\prime}_{i-j,j}\delta_{k,i-j} \right\rangle +\left\langle \sum_{i=2}^\infty\sum_{j=1}^{i-1} P^{\prime}_{i-j,j} \delta_{k,j} \right\rangle \end{aligned} $$
([10.42])

and calculate each term on the right-hand side separately. For the first term we have

$$\displaystyle \begin{aligned} \left\langle \sum_{i=2}^\infty\sum_{j=1}^{i-1} P^{\prime}_{i-j,j} n^{\prime}_k \right\rangle = \left\langle n^{\prime}_k\sum_{i=2}^\infty\sum_{j=1}^{i-1} P^{\prime}_{i-j,j} \right\rangle = \left\langle n^{\prime}_k \right\rangle \end{aligned}$$

with the last result obtained by the normalization condition for \(\mathcal P^{\prime }_{i-j,j}\). The second term gives

$$\displaystyle \begin{aligned} -\left\langle \sum_{i=2}^\infty\sum_{j=1}^{i-1} P^{\prime}_{i-j,j}\delta_{i,k} \right\rangle =-\left\langle \sum_{j=1}^{k-1} P^{\prime}_{k-j,j} \right\rangle =-\left\langle \sum_{j=1}^{k-1} \frac{n^{\prime}_k B_{k-j,j}}{(M-N+1){\bar B}{(\mathbf{n'})}} \right\rangle . \end{aligned}$$

The third and fourth terms are identical due to symmetry between all ordered pairs of fragments. The two terms combined are

$$\displaystyle \begin{aligned}\displaystyle \left\langle \sum_{i=2}^\infty\sum_{j=1}^{i-1} P^{\prime}_{i-j,j} (\delta_{k,i-j}+\delta_{k,j}) \right\rangle = 2\left\langle \sum_{i=2}^\infty\sum_{j=1}^{i-1} P^{\prime}_{i-j,j}\delta_{k,j} \right\rangle = 2\left\langle \sum_{i=k+1}^\infty P^{\prime}_{i-k,k} \right\rangle \\\displaystyle = 2\left\langle \sum_{i=k+1}^\infty \frac{n_i B_{i-k,k}}{(M-N+1){\bar B}(\mathbf{n'})} \right\rangle \end{aligned} $$

Incorporating these results into Eq. (10.42) we obtain

$$\displaystyle \begin{aligned} \left\langle n_k \right\rangle = \left\langle n^{\prime}_k \right\rangle - \left\langle \sum_{j=1}^{k-1} \frac{n^{\prime}_k B_{k-j,j}}{(M-N+1){\bar B}{\mathbf{n'}}} \right\rangle + 2\left\langle \sum_{i=k+1}^\infty \frac{n_i B_{i-k,k}}{(M-N+1){\bar B}(\mathbf{n'})} \right\rangle . \end{aligned}$$

which leads directly to Eq. (10.44) in the main text.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Matsoukas, T. (2018). Fragmentation and Shattering. In: Generalized Statistical Thermodynamics. Understanding Complex Systems. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-04149-6_10

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics