Skip to main content

The Vanishing: Looking for Friendships in Traditional Neighbouring

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
The Public Life of Friendship

Part of the book series: Palgrave Macmillan Studies in Family and Intimate Life ((PSFL))

  • 499 Accesses

Abstract

This chapter argues that, because of the way the debates have been framed, it is hard to see the contribution friendship makes to community, neighbour relations and the public sphere, particularly in the case of women. Much of the research has involved working-class communities, with a predominant focus on men to the exclusion of connections between women. And yet, women have always joined with other women, as friends and neighbours, and also by organizing politically to change some aspect of society. By confining women to isolation and invisibility within the private domestic sphere, much of the debate around community and neighbourhood has failed to recognize the public significance of what women do within their neighbourhood networks. The chapter concludes with a call to rethink community.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    First established in the UK in 1975, a locality was designated as a Housing Action Area by a local authority (usually in large urban areas such as London, Birmingham, etc.), based on poor living conditions and substandard housing. Government resources were provided to address disadvantage by improving the housing in these areas.

References

  • Abrams, P., Abrams S., Humphrey, R., and Snaith, R. (1989). Neighbourhood Care and Social Policy. London: Her Majesty’s Stationary Office.

    Google Scholar 

  • Allan, G. (1979). A Sociology of Friendship and Kinship. London: Allen and Unwin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Allan, G. (1989). Friendship: Developing a Sociological Perspective. Boulder and San Francisco: Westview Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Allan, G. (2008). Flexibility, Friendship and Family. Personal Relationships, 15(1), 1–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ariès, P. (1973). Centuries of Childhood: A Social History of Family Life (Trans. R. Baldick). Harmondsworth and Middlesex: Penguin Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ariès, P., and Duby, G. (Series Editors). (1987). A History of Private Life, Volume I: From Pagan Rome to Byzantium (Ed. G. Duby and Trans. A. Goldhammer). Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Banfield, E.C. (1967). The Moral Basis of a Backward Society. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beck-Gernsheim, E. (1999). On the Way to a Post-Familial Family: From a Community of Need to Elective Affinities. Theory, Culture and Society, 15(3–4), 53–70.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bell, L., and Ribbens, J. (1994). Isolated Housewives and Complex Maternal Worlds: The Significance of Social Contacts Between Women and Young Children in Industrial Societies. The Sociological Review, 42(4), 227–262.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bittman, M., and Pixley, J. (1997). The Double Life of the Family: Myth, Hope and Experience. Sydney: Allen & Unwin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bulmer, M. (1986). Neighbours: The Work of Phillip Abrams. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chambers, D. (2006). New Social Ties: Contemporary Connections in a Fragmented Society. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Crow, G.P. (1997). What Do We Know About the Neighbours. In P. Hoggett (Ed.), Contested Communities: Experiences, Struggles, Policies (pp. 17–30). Bristol: Policy Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crow, G.P., and Allan, G. (1995). Community Types, Community Typologies and Community Time. Time and Society, 4(2), 142–166.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crow, G., Allan, G., and Summers, M. (2002). Neither Busybodies nor Nobodies: Managing Proximity and Distance in Neighbourly Relations. Sociology, 36(1), 127–145.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elias, N. ([1939] 1994). The Civilizing Process. Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feld, S., and Carter, W.C. (1998). Foci of Activity as Changing Contexts of Friendship. In R. Adams and G. Allan (Eds.), Placing Friendship in Context (pp. 136–152). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldthorpe, J.H., D. Lockwood, F., Bechhofer, and F. Platt (1969). The Affluent Worker: Industrial Attitudes and Behavior. Cambridge: Cambridge Studies in Sociology.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hansen, K. (1997). Rediscovering the Social: Visiting Practices in Antebellum New England and the Limits of the Public/Private Dichotomy. In J. Weintraub and K. Kumar (Eds.), Public and Private in Thought and Practice: Perspectives on a Grand Dichotomy (pp. 268–302). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harrison, K. (1998). Rich Friendships, Affluent Friends: Middle-Class Practices of Friendship. In R. Adams and G. Allan (Eds.), Placing Friendship in Context (pp. 92–115). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoffman, S.L. (2001). Civility, Male Friendship and Masonic Sociability in Nineteenth Century Germany. Gender and History, 13(2), 224–248.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoggart, R. (1988). A Local Habitation: Life and Times: 1918–1940. London: Chatto and Windus.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoggett, P. (1997). Contested Communities: Experiences, Struggles, Policies. Bristol: Policy Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hunt, G., and Satterlee, S. (1987). Darts, Drink and the Pub: The Culture of Female Drinking. The Sociological Review, 35, 576–601.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jamieson, L. (1998). Intimacy: Personal Relationships in Modern Societies. Cambridge: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jerrome, D. (1984). Good Company: The Sociological Implications of Friendship. The Sociological Review, 32(4), 696–718.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lockwood, D. (1966). Sources of Variation in Working Class Images of Society. The Sociological Review, 14(3), 249–267.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCormack, T. (2008). Kelly’s Bush. Dictionary of Sydney. Retrieved from: http://dictionaryofsydney.org/entry/kellys_bush.

  • Murphy, J., and Probert, B. (2005). Never Done: The Working Mothers of the 1950’s. In P. Grimshaw, J. Murphy, and B. Probert (Eds.), Double Shift: Working Mothers and Social Change in Australia. Victoria, Australia: Circa Melbourne Publishing Group Pty Ltd.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Connor, P. (1992). Relationships Between Women. New York: Harvester Wheatsheaf.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oxley, H.G. (1974). Mateship in Local Organisation: A Study of Egalitarianism Stratification, Leadership and Amenities Projects in a Semi-industrial Community of Inland New South Wales. St Lucia: University of Queensland Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pollert, A. (1981). Girls, Wives, Factory Lives. London: MacMillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Procter, I. (1990). The Privatisation of Working Class Life: A Dissenting View. British Journal of Sociology, 41(2), 157–180.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Putnam, R.D. (1993). The Prosperous Community: Social Capital and Public Life. The American Prospect, 13, 35–42.

    Google Scholar 

  • Putnam, R.D. (2000). Bowling Alone: The Collapse and Revival of American Community. New York: Simon Schuster.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenblum, N.L. (2016). Good Neighbors: The Democracy of Everyday Life. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Ryan, M. (1979). The Power of Women’s Networks: A Case Study of Female Moral Reform in Antebellum America. Feminist Studies, 5(1), 66–85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Seabrook, J. (1973). City Close Up. Harmondsworth: Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sennett, R. ([1974] 2002). The Fall of Public Man. New York: Penguin Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sharpe, S. (1984). Double Identity: The Lives of Working Mother. Harmondsworth: Penguin Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Silver, A. (1989). Friendship and Trust as Moral Ideals: an Historical Approach. European Journal of Sociology, 30(2), 274–297.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simmel, G. ([1906] 1950). The Metropolis and Mental Life. In K.H. Wolff (Trans., Ed. and Introduction), The Sociology of Georg Simmel (pp. 409–424). New York: The Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spencer, L., and Pahl, R. (2006). Rethinking Friendship: Hidden Solidarities Today. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spindler, G. (2011). Day 2: Greenwich Wharf to Woolwich Wharf. A Sydney Harbour Circle Walk 2011–12: Historical and Background Notes (pp. 5–6). Retrieved from: http://www.walkingcoastalsydney.com.au/brochures/documents/HC2011Day2HistoricalNotesApril2011.pdf.

  • Strikwerda, R.A., and May, L. (1992). Male Friendship and Intimacy. Hypatia, 7, 110–125.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stone, L. (1977). The Family, Sex and Marriage in England 1500–1800. New York: Harper and Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sydney Morning Herald. (2006, 8 April). The Bush that Jack Built. Sydney Morning Herald. Retrieved from: https://www.smh.com.au/news/national/the-bush-that-jack-built/2006/04/07/1143916722854.html.

  • Thompson, K. ([1982] 2002). Emile Durkheim, Revised Edition, P. Hamilton (Ed.). New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wallace, R.A., and Hartley, S.F. (1988). Religious Elements in Friendship: Durkheimian Theory in an Empirical Context. In J.C. Alexander (Ed.), Durkheimian Sociology: Cultural Studies (pp. 93–106). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Wallman, S. (1984). Eight London Households. London: Tavistock.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weintraub, J. (1997). The Theory and Politics of the Public/Private Distinction. In J. Weintraub and K. Kumar (Eds.), Public and Private in Thought and Practice: Perspectives on a Grand Dichotomy (pp. 1–42). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Westwood, S. (1984). All Day, Everyday: Factory and Family in the Making of women’s lives. London and Sydney: Pluto Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Willmott, P. (1986). Neighbours, Social Networks, Informal Care and Public Policy. London: Policy Studies Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Willmott, P., and Young, M. (1960). Family and Class in a London Suburb. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zaretsky, E. (1976). Capitalism, the Family and Personal Life. London: Pluto Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jennifer Wilkinson .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Wilkinson, J. (2019). The Vanishing: Looking for Friendships in Traditional Neighbouring. In: The Public Life of Friendship . Palgrave Macmillan Studies in Family and Intimate Life. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-03161-9_7

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-03161-9_7

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-03160-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-03161-9

  • eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics