Abstract
This chapter provides a brief synopsis of past and present teacher preparation and credentialing practices along with common professional development (PD) programs emphasized in the United States and their influence in shaping instructional activities that have dominated classroom instruction. Research studies reveal that the PD of teachers has been costly yet ineffective. Thus, a consensus view of effective PD based on the learning sciences has been formed and is being promoted by the US Department of Education, among others. The latest view of effective PD may still fall short if we do not address the underlying constructs that determine a teacher’s PPATs such as their mental model of how students learn, their implicit theories of intelligence, and the forms of knowledge they employ. Addressing these constructs has the potential to create conceptual change in teachers, adjusting their PPATs to be more learner centered, and supporting the use of formative assessment practices. In addition to addressing these constructs, a new vision should be cast based on what students need to know and be able to do in a knowledge economy and teachers need to be trained and prepared to equip them accordingly.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Works Cited
Angus, D. L. (2001). Professionalism and the public good: A brief history of teacher certification. Washington, DC: Thomas B. Fordham Foundation.
Aronson, J., Fried, C. B., & Good, C. (2002). Reducing the effects of stereotype threat on African American college students by shaping theories of intelligence. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 38(2), 113–125.
Ball, D. L. (1999). Developing practice, developing practitioners: Toward a practice-based theory of professional education. In Teaching as the learning profession: Handbook of policy and practice (pp. 3–32). San Francisco: Jossey Bass.
Birman, B. F., Le Floch, K. C., Klekotka, A., Ludwig, M., Taylor, J., Walters, K., … Yoon, K.-S. (2007). State and local implementation of the “No Child Left Behind Act.” Volume II—Teacher quality under “NCLB”: Interim Report. US Department of Education.
Blackwell, L. S., Trzesniewski, K. H., & Dweck, C. S. (2007). Implicit theories of intelligence predict achievement across an adolescent transition: A longitudinal study and an intervention. Child Development, 35(1), 246–263.
Borko, H. (2004). Professional development and teacher learning: Mapping the terrain. Educational Researcher, 33(8), 3–15.
Bransford, J. D., Brown, A. L., & Cocking, R. R. (Eds.). (2000). How people learn: Brain, mind, experience, and school. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.
Cook, K. M. (1921). State laws and regulations governing teachers certificates. In (Vol. Bulletin, No. 22): Bureau of Education, Department of the Interior.
Cuban, L. (1993). How teachers taught: Constancy and change in American classrooms, 1890–1990 (2nd ed.). New York: Teachers College Press.
Darling-Hammond, L. (2018). Learning Policy Institute. Retrieved from https://learningpolicyinstitute.org/
Darling-Hammond, L., & Bransford, J. (Eds.). (2005). Preparing teachers for a changing world: What teachers should learn and be able to do (1st ed.). San Francisco, CA: Sponsored by the National Academy of Education, Jossey-Bass.
Darling-Hammond, L., & Richardson, N. (2009). Research review/teacher learning: What matters. Educational Leadership, 66(5), 46–53.
Desimone, L. M. (2011). A primer on effective professional development. The Phi Delta Kappan, 92(6), 68–71.
Drury, D., & Baer, J. (2011). The American public school teacher: Past, present, and future. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Education Press.
Dweck, C. S. (2006). Mindset: The new psychology of success. New York: Ballantine Books.
Fitzgerald, C. J., & Laurian-Fitzgerald, S. (2016). Helping students enhance their grit and growth mindsets. Journal Plus Education, 14, 52–67.
Frechtling, J. A., Sharp, L., Carey, N., & Faden-Kiernan, N. (1995). Teacher enhancement programs: A perspective on the last four decades. National Science Foundation Directorate for Education and Human Services.
Goldenberg, C., & Gallimore, R. (1991). Changing teaching takes more than a one-shot workshop. Educational Leadership, 49(3), 69–72.
Guskey, T. R. (2002). Professional development and teacher change. Teachers and Teaching, 8(3), 381–391.
Guskey, T. R. (2003). What makes professional development effective? Phi Delta Kappan, 84(10), 748–750.
Hohnen, B., & Murphy, T. (2016). The optimum context for learning; Drawing on neuroscience to inform best practice in the classroom. Educational & Child Psychology, 33(1), 75–90.
National Research Council. (2013). Education for life and work: Developing transferable knowledge and skills in the 21st century. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.
National Science Foundation. (1994). The National Science Foundation: A brief history. Retrieved from https://www.nsf.gov/about/history/nsf50/nsf8816.jsp
Preparing 21st century students for a global society: An educator’s guide to the “Four Cs”. (2014). Retrieved from http://www.nea.org/tools/52217.htm
Rattan, A., Good, C., & Dweck, C. S. (2012). “It’s ok—Not everyone can be good at math”: Instructors with an entity theory comfort (and demotivate) students. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 48(3), 731–737.
Redding, C., & Smith, T. M. (2016). Easy in, easy out: Are alternatively certified teachers turning over at increased rates? American Educational Research Journal, 53(4), 1086–1125.
Rotermund, S., DeRoche, J., & Ottem, R. (2017). Teacher professional development by selected teacher and school characteristics: 2011–12. Stats in Brief. NCES 2017-200. National Center for Education Statistics.
Roth, D., & Swail, W. S. (2000). Certification and teacher preparation in the United States. Washington, DC. Retrieved from www.educationalpolicy.org
Schleicher, A. (Ed.). (2012). Preparing teachers and developing school leaders for the 21st Century: Lessons from around the world. OECD Publishing.
Schoenfeld, A. H. (2011). How we think: A theory of goal-oriented decision making and its educational applications. New York: Routledge.
Sfard, A., & Cobb, P. (2014). Research in mathematics education: What can it teach us about human learning. In The Cambridge handbook of the learning sciences (pp. 545–563). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Shulman, L. S. (1986). Those who understand: Knowledge growth in teaching. Educational Researcher, 15(2), 4–14.
Shulman, L. S., & Shulman, J. H. (2004). How and what teachers learn: A shifting perspective. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 36(2), 257–271.
Silva, E. (2009). Measuring skills for 21st-century learning. Phi Delta Kappan, 90(9), 630–634.
Sousa, D. A. (2006). How the brain learns (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
Sparks, S. (2012). Neuroscientists find learning is not ‘hard-wired’. Education Week, 31(33), 16–17.
Spring, J. H. (2001). The American school, 1642–2000 (5th ed.). Boston: McGraw-Hill.
Stains, M., Harshman, J., Barker, M. K., Chasteen, S. V., Cole, R., DeChenne-Peters, S. E., … Rodela, T. M. (2018). Anatomy of STEM teaching in North American universities. Science, 359(6383), 1468–1470.
Sykes, G. (1996). Reform of and as professional development. The Phi Delta Kappan, 77(7), 464–467.
Sztajn, P., Confrey, J., Wilson, P. H., & Edgington, C. (2012). Learning trajectory based instruction: Toward a theory of teaching. Educational Researcher, 41(5), 147–156.
Thompson, M., & Goe, L. (2009). Models for effective and scalable teacher professional development. Retrieved from http://www.ets.org/Media/Research/pdf/RR-09-07.pdf
U.S. Department of Education-Office of Planning Evaluation and Policy Development-Policy and Program Studies Service. (2016). Prevalence of teachers without full state certification and variation across schools and states. Washington, DC.
Warner-Griffin, C., Noel, A., & Tadler, C. (2016). Sources of newly hired teachers in the United States: Results from the schools and staffing survey, 1987–88 to 2011–12. NCES 2016-876. Retrieved from https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED569202.pdf
Weigmann, K. (2013). Educating the brain. The growing knowledge about how our brain works can inform educational programmes and approaches, in particular, for children with learning problems. EMBO Reports, 14(2), 136–139.
Wilson, S. M., & Berne, J. (1999). Teacher learning and the acquisition of professional knowledge: An examination of research on contemporary professional development. Review of Research In Education, American Educational Research Association, 24(1), 173–209.
Wilson, P. H., Sztajn, P., Edgington, C., Webb, J., & Myers, M. (2017). Changes in teachers’ discourse about students in a professional development on learning trajectories. American Educational Research Journal, 54(3), 568–604.
Wissehr, C., Concannon, J., & Barrow, L. H. (2011). Looking back at the Sputnik era and its impact on science education. School Science and Mathematics, 111(7), 368–375.
Wolman, P. (2010). Status of the American public school teacher, 2005–2006. National Education Association Research Department.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Box, C. (2019). The Professional Development of Teachers. In: Formative Assessment in United States Classrooms. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-03092-6_5
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-03092-6_5
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-03091-9
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-03092-6
eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)