Skip to main content

The Professional Development of Teachers

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Formative Assessment in United States Classrooms

Abstract

This chapter provides a brief synopsis of past and present teacher preparation and credentialing practices along with common professional development (PD) programs emphasized in the United States and their influence in shaping instructional activities that have dominated classroom instruction. Research studies reveal that the PD of teachers has been costly yet ineffective. Thus, a consensus view of effective PD based on the learning sciences has been formed and is being promoted by the US Department of Education, among others. The latest view of effective PD may still fall short if we do not address the underlying constructs that determine a teacher’s PPATs such as their mental model of how students learn, their implicit theories of intelligence, and the forms of knowledge they employ. Addressing these constructs has the potential to create conceptual change in teachers, adjusting their PPATs to be more learner centered, and supporting the use of formative assessment practices. In addition to addressing these constructs, a new vision should be cast based on what students need to know and be able to do in a knowledge economy and teachers need to be trained and prepared to equip them accordingly.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Works Cited

  • Angus, D. L. (2001). Professionalism and the public good: A brief history of teacher certification. Washington, DC: Thomas B. Fordham Foundation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aronson, J., Fried, C. B., & Good, C. (2002). Reducing the effects of stereotype threat on African American college students by shaping theories of intelligence. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 38(2), 113–125.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ball, D. L. (1999). Developing practice, developing practitioners: Toward a practice-based theory of professional education. In Teaching as the learning profession: Handbook of policy and practice (pp. 3–32). San Francisco: Jossey Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Birman, B. F., Le Floch, K. C., Klekotka, A., Ludwig, M., Taylor, J., Walters, K., … Yoon, K.-S. (2007). State and local implementation of the “No Child Left Behind Act.” Volume II—Teacher quality under “NCLB”: Interim Report. US Department of Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blackwell, L. S., Trzesniewski, K. H., & Dweck, C. S. (2007). Implicit theories of intelligence predict achievement across an adolescent transition: A longitudinal study and an intervention. Child Development, 35(1), 246–263.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Borko, H. (2004). Professional development and teacher learning: Mapping the terrain. Educational Researcher, 33(8), 3–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bransford, J. D., Brown, A. L., & Cocking, R. R. (Eds.). (2000). How people learn: Brain, mind, experience, and school. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cook, K. M. (1921). State laws and regulations governing teachers certificates. In (Vol. Bulletin, No. 22): Bureau of Education, Department of the Interior.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cuban, L. (1993). How teachers taught: Constancy and change in American classrooms, 1890–1990 (2nd ed.). New York: Teachers College Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Darling-Hammond, L. (2018). Learning Policy Institute. Retrieved from https://learningpolicyinstitute.org/

  • Darling-Hammond, L., & Bransford, J. (Eds.). (2005). Preparing teachers for a changing world: What teachers should learn and be able to do (1st ed.). San Francisco, CA: Sponsored by the National Academy of Education, Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Darling-Hammond, L., & Richardson, N. (2009). Research review/teacher learning: What matters. Educational Leadership, 66(5), 46–53.

    Google Scholar 

  • Desimone, L. M. (2011). A primer on effective professional development. The Phi Delta Kappan, 92(6), 68–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Drury, D., & Baer, J. (2011). The American public school teacher: Past, present, and future. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Education Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dweck, C. S. (2006). Mindset: The new psychology of success. New York: Ballantine Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fitzgerald, C. J., & Laurian-Fitzgerald, S. (2016). Helping students enhance their grit and growth mindsets. Journal Plus Education, 14, 52–67.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frechtling, J. A., Sharp, L., Carey, N., & Faden-Kiernan, N. (1995). Teacher enhancement programs: A perspective on the last four decades. National Science Foundation Directorate for Education and Human Services.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldenberg, C., & Gallimore, R. (1991). Changing teaching takes more than a one-shot workshop. Educational Leadership, 49(3), 69–72.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guskey, T. R. (2002). Professional development and teacher change. Teachers and Teaching, 8(3), 381–391.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guskey, T. R. (2003). What makes professional development effective? Phi Delta Kappan, 84(10), 748–750.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hohnen, B., & Murphy, T. (2016). The optimum context for learning; Drawing on neuroscience to inform best practice in the classroom. Educational & Child Psychology, 33(1), 75–90.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Research Council. (2013). Education for life and work: Developing transferable knowledge and skills in the 21st century. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Science Foundation. (1994). The National Science Foundation: A brief history. Retrieved from https://www.nsf.gov/about/history/nsf50/nsf8816.jsp

  • Preparing 21st century students for a global society: An educator’s guide to the “Four Cs”. (2014). Retrieved from http://www.nea.org/tools/52217.htm

  • Rattan, A., Good, C., & Dweck, C. S. (2012). “It’s ok—Not everyone can be good at math”: Instructors with an entity theory comfort (and demotivate) students. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 48(3), 731–737.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Redding, C., & Smith, T. M. (2016). Easy in, easy out: Are alternatively certified teachers turning over at increased rates? American Educational Research Journal, 53(4), 1086–1125.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rotermund, S., DeRoche, J., & Ottem, R. (2017). Teacher professional development by selected teacher and school characteristics: 2011–12. Stats in Brief. NCES 2017-200. National Center for Education Statistics.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roth, D., & Swail, W. S. (2000). Certification and teacher preparation in the United States. Washington, DC. Retrieved from www.educationalpolicy.org

  • Schleicher, A. (Ed.). (2012). Preparing teachers and developing school leaders for the 21st Century: Lessons from around the world. OECD Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schoenfeld, A. H. (2011). How we think: A theory of goal-oriented decision making and its educational applications. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sfard, A., & Cobb, P. (2014). Research in mathematics education: What can it teach us about human learning. In The Cambridge handbook of the learning sciences (pp. 545–563). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shulman, L. S. (1986). Those who understand: Knowledge growth in teaching. Educational Researcher, 15(2), 4–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shulman, L. S., & Shulman, J. H. (2004). How and what teachers learn: A shifting perspective. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 36(2), 257–271.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Silva, E. (2009). Measuring skills for 21st-century learning. Phi Delta Kappan, 90(9), 630–634.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sousa, D. A. (2006). How the brain learns (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sparks, S. (2012). Neuroscientists find learning is not ‘hard-wired’. Education Week, 31(33), 16–17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spring, J. H. (2001). The American school, 1642–2000 (5th ed.). Boston: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stains, M., Harshman, J., Barker, M. K., Chasteen, S. V., Cole, R., DeChenne-Peters, S. E., … Rodela, T. M. (2018). Anatomy of STEM teaching in North American universities. Science, 359(6383), 1468–1470.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sykes, G. (1996). Reform of and as professional development. The Phi Delta Kappan, 77(7), 464–467.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sztajn, P., Confrey, J., Wilson, P. H., & Edgington, C. (2012). Learning trajectory based instruction: Toward a theory of teaching. Educational Researcher, 41(5), 147–156.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, M., & Goe, L. (2009). Models for effective and scalable teacher professional development. Retrieved from http://www.ets.org/Media/Research/pdf/RR-09-07.pdf

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • U.S. Department of Education-Office of Planning Evaluation and Policy Development-Policy and Program Studies Service. (2016). Prevalence of teachers without full state certification and variation across schools and states. Washington, DC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Warner-Griffin, C., Noel, A., & Tadler, C. (2016). Sources of newly hired teachers in the United States: Results from the schools and staffing survey, 1987–88 to 2011–12. NCES 2016-876. Retrieved from https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED569202.pdf

  • Weigmann, K. (2013). Educating the brain. The growing knowledge about how our brain works can inform educational programmes and approaches, in particular, for children with learning problems. EMBO Reports, 14(2), 136–139.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, S. M., & Berne, J. (1999). Teacher learning and the acquisition of professional knowledge: An examination of research on contemporary professional development. Review of Research In Education, American Educational Research Association, 24(1), 173–209.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, P. H., Sztajn, P., Edgington, C., Webb, J., & Myers, M. (2017). Changes in teachers’ discourse about students in a professional development on learning trajectories. American Educational Research Journal, 54(3), 568–604.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wissehr, C., Concannon, J., & Barrow, L. H. (2011). Looking back at the Sputnik era and its impact on science education. School Science and Mathematics, 111(7), 368–375.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wolman, P. (2010). Status of the American public school teacher, 2005–2006. National Education Association Research Department.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Box, C. (2019). The Professional Development of Teachers. In: Formative Assessment in United States Classrooms. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-03092-6_5

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-03092-6_5

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-03091-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-03092-6

  • eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics