Skip to main content

Blocking as a Function of the Nature of Linguistic Representations: Where Psycholinguistics and Morphology Meet

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Competition in Inflection and Word-Formation

Part of the book series: Studies in Morphology ((SUMO,volume 5))

Abstract

This paper addresses the question to what extent morphological blocking in language is a rule-based phenomenon. We argue that language users do not operate with a blocking rule, but that a form preference emerges as a result of cognitive selection mechanisms in a neural network of linguistic information. The actual target form develops its own token frequency in a probabilistic process, known as Preferential Attachment. After some time and some generations, one form will develop a nearly absolute dominance with its own local token frequency. This model implies that there is no blocking as an active negative action, but only a local lemma specific frequency, built up by a stochastic Preferential Attachment process, which favours one of the theoretically possible forms and, as a consequence, ‘suppresses’ the other options.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 149.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    https://books.google.com/ngrams/graph?content=thief%2Cstealer&year_start=1980&year_end=2000&corpus=0&smoothing=10&share=&direct_url=t1%3B%2Cthief%3B%2Cc0%3B.t1%3B%2Cstealer%3B%2Cc0 (April 14, 2017).

  2. 2.

    To follow the mentioned example with three variants, it can be mentioned that Frisian has indeed a third alternative, next to -ens and -heid, namely -te: gruttens, grutheid and grutte all three exist, with substantial overlap in actual use and meaning.

  3. 3.

    See: https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/mouse (visited March 30, 2017).

References

  • Arndt-Lappe, Sabine. 2014. Analogy in Suffix Rivalry – The Case of English -ity and -ness. English Language and Linguistics 18 (3): 497–548.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aronoff, Mark. 1976. Word Formation in Generative Grammar. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2019. Competitors and Alternants in Linguistic Morphology. In Competition in Inflection and Word-Formation, ed. Franz Rainer, Francesco Gardani, Wolfgang U. Dressler, and Hans Christian Luschützky, 39–66. Cham: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beckner, Clay, and Andrew Wedel. 2009. The Roles of Acquisition and Usage in Morphological Change. Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society 35 (1): 1–12. https://doi.org/10.3765/bls.v35i1.3593.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bien, Heidrun, Willem Levelt, and Harald Baayen. 2005. Frequency Effects in Compound Production. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA (PNAS) 102 (49): 17876–17881. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0508431102.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bod, Rens. 2009. From Exemplar to Grammar: A Probabilistic Analogy-Based Model of Language Learning. Cognitive Science 33 (5): 752–793.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bybee, Joan. 1995. Regular Morphology and the Lexicon. Language and Cognitive Processes 10: 425–455.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2007. Frequency of Use and the Organization of Language. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2010. Language, Usage and Cognition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Chomsky, Noam. 1957. Syntactic Structures. The Hague: Mouton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Daelemans, Walter. 2002. A Comparison of Analogical Modeling of Language to Memory-Based Language Processing. In Analogical Modeling: An Exemplar-Based Approach to Language, ed. Royal Skousen, Deryle Lonsdale, and Dilworth B. Parkinson, 157–179. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • de Haan, Germen J. 1997. Contact-Induced Changes in Modern West Frisian. Us Wurk 1997: 61–89.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Vries, Wobbe. 1910–1912. Dysmelie: opmerkingen Over syntaxis. Verhandeling behoordende bij het Programma van het Gymnasium der gemeente Groningen 1910–1911 en 1911–1912. Groningen: B. Jacobs.

    Google Scholar 

  • Diessel, Holger. 2007. Frequency Effects in Language Acquisition, Language Use, and Diachronic Change. New Ideas in Psychology 25 (2): 104–123.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dijkstra, Anton. 2003. Lexical Storage and Retrieval in Bilinguals. In The Interface Between Syntax and the Lexicon in Second Language Acquisition, ed. Roeland van Hout, Aafke Hulk, Folkert Kuiken, and Richard Towell, 129–150. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2008. Met andere woorden: over taal en meertaligheid [In Other Words: On Language and Multilingualism]. Inaugural address. Nijmegen: Radboud Universiteit.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dressler, Wolfgang, Lavinia Merlini Barbaresi, Sonja Schwaiger, Jutta Ransmayr, Sabine Sommer-Lolei, and Katharina Korecky-Kröll. 2019. Rivalry and Lack of Blocking Among Italian and German Diminutives in Adult and Child Language. In Competition in Inflection and Word-Formation, ed. Franz Rainer, Francesco Gardani, Wolfgang U. Dressler, and Hans Christian Luschützky, 123–143. Cham: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Embick, D., and A. Marantz. 2008. Architecture and Blocking. Linguistic Inquiry 39 (1): 1–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fertig, David. 2013. Analogy and Morphological Change. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gardani, Francesco, Franz Rainer, and Hans Christian Luschützky. 2019. Competition in Morphology: A Historical Outline. In Competition in Inflection and Word-Formation, ed. Franz Rainer, Francesco Gardani, Wolfgang U. Dressler, and Hans Christian Luschützky, 3–36. Cham: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haspelmath, Martin. 2006. Against Markedness (and What to Replace it with). Journal of Linguistics 42 (1): 25–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hay, Jennifer, and Harald Baayen. 2002. Parsing and Productivity. In Yearbook of Morphology 2001, ed. Geert Booij and Jaap van Marle, 203–235. Berlin: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Heeringa, Wilbert. 2004. Measuring Dialect Pronunciation Differences Using Levenshtein Distance. Groningen: University of Groningen dissertation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hofstadter, Douglas, and Emmanuel Sander. 2013. Surfaces and Essences: Analogy As the Fuel and Fire of Thinking. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hulk, Aafke, and Natascha Müller. 2000. Bilingual First Language Acquisition at the Interface Between Syntax and Pragmatics. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 3 (3): 227–244.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krott, Andrea, Harald Baayen, and Robert Schreuder. 2001. Analogy in Morphology: Modeling the Choice of Linking Morphemes in Dutch. Linguistics 39: 51–93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Labov, William, Sharon Ash, Maciej Baranowski, Naomi Nagy, Maya Ravindranath, and Tracey Weldon. 2006. Listeners’ Sensitivity to the Frequency of Sociolinguistic Variables. University of Pennsylvania Working Papers in Linguistics 12 (2): 10. http://repository.upenn.edu/pwpl/vol12/iss2/10.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lieberman, Erez, Jean-Baptiste Michel, Joe Jackson, Tina Tang, and Martin A. Nowak. 2007. Quantifying the Evolutionary Dynamics of Language. Nature 449 (7163): 713–716. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature06137.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Masini, Francesca. 2019. Competition Between Morphological Words and Multiword Expressions. In Competition in Inflection and Word-Formation, ed. Franz Rainer, Francesco Gardani, Wolfgang U. Dressler, and Hans Christian Luschützky, 281–305. Cham: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maslen, Robert J.C., Anna L. Theakson, Elena V.M. Lieven, and Michael Tomasello. 2004. A Dense Corpus Study of Past Tense and Plural Overregularization in English. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research 47(6): 1319–1333.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Paul, Hermann. 1909. Prinzipien der Sprachgeschichte. Vierte Auflage. Max Niemeyer: Halle a.S.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rainer, Franz. 2012. Morphological Metaphysics: Virtual, Potential, and Actual Words. Word Structure 5 (2): 165–182. https://doi.org/10.3366/word.2012.0025.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2016. Blocking. Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Linguistics. http://linguistics.oxfordre.com/view/10.1093/acrefore/9780199384655.001.0001/acrefore-9780199384655-e-33.

  • Schuchardt, Hugo. 1885/1972. Über die Lautgesetze: Gegen die Junggrammatiker. Berlin: Oppenheim. Reprint and translation in Theo Vennemann and Terence H. Wilbur (eds) (1972). Schuchardt, the Neogrammarians, and the Transformational Theory of Phonological Change, 1–72. Frankfurt: Athenäum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Skousen, Royal. 1989. Analogical Modeling of Language. Dordrecht/Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2005. Analogical Modelling. In Quantitative Linguistics: An International Handbook, ed. Reinhard Köhler, Gabriel Altmann, and Rajmund Piotrowski, 705–716. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.

    Google Scholar 

  • Skousen, Royal, Deryle Lonsdale, and Dilworth B. Parkinson. 2002. Analogical Modeling: An Exemplar-Based Approach to Language. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Smits, Erica, Heike Martensen, Ton Dijkstra, and Dominiek Sandra. 2006. Naming Interlingual Homographs: Variable Competition and the Role of the Decision System. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 9 (3): 281–297.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smits, Erica, Dominiek Sandra, Heike Martensen, and Ton Dijkstra. 2009. Phonological Inconsistency in Word Naming: Determinants of the Interference Effect Between Languages. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 12 (1): 23–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Strik, Oscar, and Arjen Versloot. 2015. Frequency and Analogy in Early Modern Frisian Verb Inflection. In Modelling Analogical Change. A History of Swedish and Frisian Verb Inflection, Groningen Dissertations in Linguistics 137, ed. Oscar Strik, 165–177. Groningen: University of Groningen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tiersma, Piter Meijes. 1979. Aspects of the Phonology of Frisian Based on the Language of Grou, Meidielingen Stúdzjerjochting Frysk Oan de Frije Universiteit Yn Amsterdam 4. Amsterdam: Vrije Universiteit, Studierichting Fries.

    Google Scholar 

  • van Heuven, Walter, Emily Coderre, Taomei Guo and Ton Dijkstra. 2011. The Influence of Cross-Language Similarity on Within- and Between-Language Stroop Effects in Trilinguals. Frontiers in COGNITION 2: 374. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2011.00374 (26 March, 2012).

  • Versloot, Arjen Pieter, and Elżbieta Adamczyk. 2018. A Multivariate Analysis of Morphological Variation in Plural Inflection in North Sea Germanic Languages. In Reorganising Grammatical Variation. Diachronic Studies in the Retention, Redistribution and Refunctionalisation of Linguistic Variants, ed. Antje Dammel, Matthias Eitelmann, and Mirjam Schmuck, 17–55. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Versloot, Arjen, and Eric Hoekstra. 2016. Attraction Between Words as a Function of Frequency and Representational Distance: Words in the Bilingual Brain. Linguistics 54 (6): 1223–1240.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ytsma, Johannes. 1995. Frisian as First and Second Language. Sociolinguistic and Socio-psychological Aspects of the Acquisition of Frisian Among Frisian and Dutch Primary School Children. Ljouwert: Fryske Akademy. PhD-thesis, University Tilburg.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yule, George Udny. 1925. A Mathematical Theory of Evolution: Based on the Conclusions of Dr. J.C. Willis, F.R.S. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London, 21–87. Series B, Containing Papers of a Biological Character 213.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Arjen P. Versloot .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Versloot, A.P., Hoekstra, E. (2019). Blocking as a Function of the Nature of Linguistic Representations: Where Psycholinguistics and Morphology Meet. In: Rainer, F., Gardani, F., Dressler, W., Luschützky, H. (eds) Competition in Inflection and Word-Formation . Studies in Morphology, vol 5. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-02550-2_6

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-02550-2_6

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-02549-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-02550-2

  • eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics