Abstract
This contribution deals with competition (rivalry) between diminutive suffixations in (Austrian) German and Italian adult language and child speech and the motivation of differences in terms of productivity and degree of morphosemantic transparency/opacity of the respective diminutives. For this purpose productivity, availability and profitability are differentiated, a scale of morphosemantic transparency/opacity is established which ranges from full transparency (degree 1), over slight pragmatic restrictions (degree 2), to total opacity (unless in metalinguistic reflections: degree 9) and fake decompositionality (degree 10). The degrees of transparency/opacity differ for different suffixations, in German also between compound and simplex diminutives. Longitudinal studies of early child language show that child language is more transparent than adult language in types and tokens. In both there is competition between fully transparent suffixations (degree 1) without any pattern blocking or lexical blocking, because such diminutives are mainly formed and used for pragmatic reasons and never for the purpose of lexical enrichment. Since productivity, availability and profitability of diminutive formation is much higher in Italian than in German, there is much more competition between diminutive suffixations in Italian than in German adult language. This difference between the two languages is much less the case in early child language. Possible psycholinguistic consequences are mentioned in the outlook.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
- 1.
This could also be said of word-final -er, thus allowing an alternative to haplology.
References
Alberti, Claudia, Nilda Ruimy, Giovanna Turrini, and Giampiero Zanchi. 1991. La donzelletta vien dalla donzella. Dizionario delle forme alterate della lingua italiana. Bologna: Zanichelli.
Apothéloz, Denis, and Gilles Boyé, eds. 2004a. La compositionnalité en morphologie. Verbum 26, 4.
———. 2004b. Remarques sur la compositionnalité en morphologie. Verbum 26: 375–385.
Aronoff, Mark. 1976. Word Formation in Generative Grammar. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Barz, Irmhild. 1983. Wortbedeutung und Wortbildungsbedeutung. Zeitschrift für Germanistik 4: 65–69.
Bauer, Laurie. 2001. Morphological Productivity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Bauer, Laurie, Rochelle Lieber, and Ingo Plag. 2013. The Oxford Reference Guide to English Morphology. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Bourque, Yves. 2014. Toward a Typology of Semantic Transparency: The Case of French Compounds. PhD thesis, University of Toronto.
Bybee, Joan. 2010. Language, Usage and Cognition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Clark, E.V. 1993. The Lexicon in Acquisition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Corbett, Greville. 2007. Canonical Typology, Suppletion, and Possible Words. Language 83: 8–41.
Corbin, Danielle. 1987. Morphologie dérivationnelle et structuration du lexique. 2 vols. Tübingen: Niemeyer.
Cresti, Emanuela. 2000. Corpus di italiano parlato. Firenze: Accademia della Crusca.
Crocco Galèas, Grazia, and Wolfgang U. Dressler. 1992. Trasparenza morfotattica e morfosemantica dei composti nominali più produttivi dell’italiano di oggi. In Atti del 25. Congresso Società di Linguistica Italiana, ed. Bruno Moretti, Dario Petrini, and Sandro Bianconi, 9–24. Roma: Bulzoni.
Dal, Georgette, ed. 2003. La productivité morphologique en questions et en expérimentations. Langue Française 140.
Dowty, David. 2007. Compositionality As an Empirical Problem. In Direct Compositionality, ed. Chris Barker and Pauline Jacobson, 23–101. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Dressler, Wolfgang U. 1985. On the Predictiveness of Natural Morphology. Linguistics 21: 321–337.
———. 1989. Prototypical Differences Between Inflection and Derivation. Zeitschrift für Phonetik, Sprachwissenschaft und Kommunikationsforschung 42: 3–10.
———. 1999. On a Semiotic Theory of Preferences in Language. In Essays in Semiotic Analysis., The Peirce Semiotic Papers, ed. Michael Shapiro and Michael C. Haley, vol. 4, 389–415.
———. 2005. Word-Formation in Natural Morphology. In Handbook of Word-Formation, ed. Pavel Štekauer and Rochelle Lieber, 267–284. New York: Springer.
———. 2006. Natural Morphology. Special Issue Folia Linguistica 40: 1–2.
———. 2007. Productivity in Word Formation. In The Mental Lexicon: Core Perspectives, ed. Gonia Jarema and Gary Libben, 159–183. Amsterdam: Elsevier.
Dressler, Wolfgang U., and Katharina Korecky-Kröll. 2015. Evaluative Morphology and Language Acquisition. In Edinburgh Handbook of Evaluative Morphology, ed. Nicola Grandi and LĂvia KörtvĂ©lyessy, 134–141. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
Dressler, Wolfgang U., and Mária Ladányi. 2000. Productivity in Word Formation (WF): A Morphological Approach. Acta Linguistica Hungarica 47: 103–144.
Dressler, Wolfgang U., and Lavinia Merlini Barbaresi. 1994. Morphopragmatics: Diminutives and Intensifiers in Italian, German and Other Languages. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
———. 2001. Morphopragmatics of Diminutives and Augmentatives: On the Priority of Pragmatics Over Semantics. In Perspectives on Semantics, Pragmatics, and Discourse, ed. Istvan Kenesei and Robert M. Harnish, 43–58. Amsterdam: Benjamins.
Dressler, Wolfgang U., Gary Libben, and Katharina Korecky-Kröll. 2014. Conflicting vs. Converging vs. Interdependent Motivations in Morphology. In Competing Motivations in Grammar and Usage, ed. Brian MacWhinney, Andrej Malchukov, and Edith Moravcsik, 181–196. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Dressler, Wolfgang U., Lavinia Merlini Barbaresi, Sonja Schwaiger, and Jutta Ransmayr. 2016. Skalierung der morphosemantischen Transparenz/Opazität deutscher und italienischer Diminutive. In Die Zukunft der Grammatik – Die Grammatik der Zukunft: Festschrift für Werner Abraham, ed. Elisabeth Leiss. Stuttgart: Stauffenburg Verlag In print.
Fortin, Antonio. 2011. The Morphology and Semantics of Expressive Affixes. PhD thesis, University of Oxford.
Fradin, Bernard. 2009. Morphologie constructionnelle et sémantique. Mémoires de la Société de Linguistique de Paris 17: 89–118.
Fradin, Bernard, Nabil Hathout, and Fanny Meunier. 2003. La suffixation en -et et la question de la productivité. Langue Française 140: 56–78.
Frege, Gottlob. 1891. Function und Begriff. Jena: Pohle.
Gardani, Francesco. 2013. Dynamics of Morphological Productivity: The Evolution of Noun Classes from Latin to Italian. Leiden: Brill.
Glauninger, Manfred M. 2005. Form und Funktion der -(er)l-Deminutive. Am Beispiel des Grazer Deutsch. Frankfurt: Lang.
Grandi, Nicola. 2002. Morfologie in contatto. Le costruzioni valutative nelle lingue del Mediterraneo. Milano: Franco Angeli.
Grandi, Nicola, and Livia Körtvélyessy, eds. 2015. Edinburgh Handbook of Evaluative Morphology. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
La Repubblica: Corpus: http://dev.sslmit.unibo.it/corpora/corpora.php.
Israel, Michael. 2011. The Grammar of Polarity: Pragmatics, Sensitivity, and the Logic of Scales. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Kiefer, Ferenc. 2004. Morphopragmatic Phenomena in Hungarian. Acta Linguistica Hungarica 51: 325–349.
Klimaszewska, Zofia. 1983. Diminutive und augmentative Ausdrucksmöglichkeiten des Niederländischen, Deutschen und Polnischen. Wrocław: Wydawnictwo Polskiej Akademii Nauk.
Korecky-Kröll, K., and W.U. Dressler. 2007. Diminutives and Hypocoristics in Austrian German (AG). In The Acquisition of Diminutives: A Cross-Linguistic Perspective, ed. Ineta Savickienė and Wolfgang U. Dressler, 207–230. Amsterdam: Benjamins.
Korecky-Kröll, Katharina, Kumru Uzunkaya-Sharma, Christine Czinglar, and Wolfgang U. Dressler. 2016. Der Input im Elternhaus und Kindergarten als wichtiger Faktor für den Spracherwerb von austrotürkischen Kindern. In Migration und Integration – wissenschaftliche Perspektiven aus Österreich, Jahrbuch 3, ed. Jennifer Carvill Schellenbacher, Julia Dahlvik, Heinz Fassmann, and Christoph Reinprecht, 67–87. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht Academic.
Libben, Gary. 1998. Semantic Transparency in the Processing of Compounds: Consequences for Representation, Processing and Impairment. Brain and Language 61: 30–44.
———. 2010. Compounds, Semantic Transparency and Morphological Transcendence. In New Impulses in Word Formation, ed. Susan Olsen, 212–232. Hamburg: Buske.
Lindsay, Mark, and Mark Aronoff. 2015. Natural Selection in Self-organizing Morphological Systems. In Morphology in Toulouse, ed. Nabil Hathout, Fabio Montermini, and Jesse Tseng, 133–153. München: Lincom Europa.
Malicka-Kleparska, Anna. 1985. Parallel Derivation and Lexicalist Morphology: The Case of Polish Diminutivization. In Phono-Morphology. Studies in the Interaction of Phonology and Morphology, ed. Edmund Gussmann, 95–112. Lublin: Katolicki Uniwersytet Lubelski.
Mayerthaler, Willi. 1981. Morphologische NatĂĽrlichkeit. Wiesbaden: Athenaion.
Merlini Barbaresi, Lavinia. 2004. Alterazione. In La formazione delle parole in italiano, ed. Maria Grossmann and Franz Rainer, 264–292. Tübingen: Niemeyer.
———. 2015. Evaluative Morphology and Pragmatics. In Edinburgh handbook of evaluative morphology, ed. Nicola Grandi and LĂvia KörtvĂ©lyessy, 32–42. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
Motsch, Wolfgang. 1981. Der kreative Aspekt in der Wortbildung. In Wortbildung, eds. Leonhard Lipka and Hartmut Günther, 94–118. Darmstadt: Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft.
———. 1999. Deutsche Wortbildung in Grundzügen. Berlin: de Gruyter.
Noccetti, Sabrina, Anna De Marco, Livia Tonelli, and Wolfgang U. Dressler. 2007. The Role of Diminutives in the Acquisition of Italian Morphology. In The Acquisition of Diminutives: A Cross-Linguistic Perspective, ed. Ineta Savickienė and Wolfgang U. Dressler, 125–153. Amsterdam: Benjamins.
Ott, Dennis. 2011. Diminutive-Formation in German: Spelling Out the Classifier Analysis. Journal of Comparative Germanic Linguistics 14: 1–46.
Paisà : Piattaforma per l’Apprendimento dell’italiano. 2010. http://www.corpusitaliano/it/it/index.html.
Peters, Ann M. 1985. Language Segmentation: Operating Principles for the Perception and Analysis of Language. In The Crosslinguistic Study of Language Acquisition, ed. Dan I. Slobin, vol. 2, 1029–1067. Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Potts, Christopher. 2007. The Expressive Dimension. Theoretical Linguistics 33: 165–198.
Rainer, Franz. 1990. Appunti sui diminutive italiani in -etto e -ino. In Parallela 4: morfologia, ed. Monica Berretta, Piera Molinelli, and Ada Valentini, 207–218. Tübingen: Narr.
———. 2012. Morphological Metaphysics: Virtual, Potential, and Actual Words. Word Structure 5: 165–182.
———. 2016. Blocking. Oxford Research Encyclopedia, Linguistics. https://doi.org/10.1093/acrefore/9780199384655.013.33.
Rainer, Franz, Wolfgang U. Dressler, Francesco Gardani, and Hans Christian Luschützky. 2014. Morphology and Meaning: An Overview. In Morphology and Meaning, ed. Franz Rainer, Wolfgang U. Dressler, Francesco Gardani, and Hans Christian Luschützky, 4–46. Amsterdam: Benjamins.
Ransmayr, Jutta, Sonja Schwaiger, Matej Durco, Hannes Pirker, and Wolfgang U. Dressler. 2016. Graduierung der Transparenz von Diminutiven auf -chen: Eine korpuslinguistische Untersuchung. Deutsche Sprache 44: 261–286.
Ransmayr, Jutta, Karlheinz Mörth, and Matej Durco. 2017. AMC (Austrian Media Corpus) – Korpusbasierte Forschungen zum österreichischen Deutsch. In Digitale Methoden der Korpusarbeit in Österreich. Beiträge von der 40. Österreichischen Linguiastiktagung, ed. Claudia Resch and Wolfgang U. Dressler. Wien: Verlag der Österreichischen Akademie der Wissenschaften.
Savickiene, Ineta, and Wolfgang U. Dressler, eds. 2007. The acquisition of diminutives: A cross-linguistic perspective. Amsterdam: Benjamins.
Schwaiger, Sonja, Jutta Ransmayr, Adrien Barbaresi, Katharina Korecky-Kröll, and Wolfgang U. Dressler. forthcoming. Diminutivvariation in österreichischen elektronischen Korpora. Tagung “Deutsch in Österreich. Variation – Perzeption – Kontakt”.
Slobin, Dan I. 1985. Crosslinguistic Evidence for the Language-Making Capacity. In The Crosslinguistic Study of Language Acquisition, ed. Dan I. Slobin, vol. 2, 1157–1249. Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Ĺ tekauer, Pavol. 2005. Meaning Predictability in Word Formation. Amsterdam: Benjamins.
Sternefeld, Wolfgang, ed. 2007. Data in Generative Grammar. Theoretical Linguistics 33: 3.
Tajsner, Przemysław. forthcoming. On the Alleged Bankruptcy of Armchair Linguistics: Reassessing the Data Base for Generative Syntax. Plenary talk, 46th Poznań Linguistic Meeting.
Talamo, Luigi, Chiara Celata, and Pier Marco Bertinetto. 2016. DerivaTario: An Annotated Lexicon of Italian Derivatives. Word Structure 9: 72–102.
Wellmann, Hans. 1975. Deutsche Wortbildung. Typen und Tendenzen in der Gegenwartssprache: Das Substantiv. DĂĽsseldorf: Schwann.
Werning, Markus, Wolfram Hinzen, and Edouard Machery, eds. 2012. The Oxford Handbook of Compositionality. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Wurzel, W.U. 1984. Flexionsmorphologie und NatĂĽrlichkeit. Berlin: Akademie-Verlag.
Acknowledgements
We thank Franz Rainer, Francesco Gardani, Hans Christian LuschĂĽtzky and anonymous readers for their many valuable critical comments to earlier versions of our paper.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Dressler, W.U., Merlini Barbaresi, L., Schwaiger, S., Ransmayr, J., Sommer-Lolei, S., Korecky-Kröll, K. (2019). Rivalry and Lack of Blocking Among Italian and German Diminutives in Adult and Child Language. In: Rainer, F., Gardani, F., Dressler, W., Luschützky, H. (eds) Competition in Inflection and Word-Formation . Studies in Morphology, vol 5. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-02550-2_5
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-02550-2_5
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-02549-6
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-02550-2
eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)