Skip to main content

Postmodern Turn in North American Social Studies Education: Considering Identities, Contexts, and Discourses

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Curriculum in International Contexts

Part of the book series: Curriculum Studies Worldwide ((CSWW))

  • 790 Accesses

Abstract

Historically, traditional social studies research and teaching in North America and worldwide has been enfolded within a positivist and modernist paradigm that is mainly concerned with the transmission of facts and “objective” uni-perspectival knowledge. Informed by an instrumental approach and behaviouristic notions of learning, traditional social studies instruction eschews critical engagement with social conflicts and political problems and thus, knowingly or unknowingly, contributes to the perpetuation of existing hegemonic power structures and social and economic inequalities. Such an approach isolates social studies from important intellectual debates that have been going on in academia since the 1980s (e.g. postmodernism, postcolonialism, critical feminism, and cultural studies). In this chapter, Kumar emphasizes the need to accommodate postmodern and poststructural thinking into social studies research and teaching, allowing educators and students to engage with social studies from critical, reflexive, democratic, and inclusive perspectives.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 119.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Allen, J. (2003). Lost geographies of power. Malden, MA: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Althusser, L. (1971). Lenin and philosophy and other essays (B. Brewster, Trans.). London: New Left Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Apple, M., & Teitelbaum, K. (1985). Are teachers losing control of their jobs? Social Education, 49(5), 372–375.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ares, N., Buendía, E., & Helfenbein, R. (Eds.). (2017). Deterritorializing/reterritorializing: Critical geography of educational reform. New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aronowitz, S., & Giroux, H. A. (1991). Postmodern education: Politics, culture, and social criticism. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aronowitz, S., & Giroux, H. A. (1993). Education still under siege. Westport, CT: Bergin & Garvey.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ashcroft, B., Griffiths, G., & Tiffin, H. (2013). Post-colonial studies: The key concepts. London & New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aylesworth, G. (2015). Postmodernism. In N. Edward (Ed.), The Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy. Retrieved from https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2015/entries/postmodernism/.

  • Baudrillard, J. (1993). The evil demon of images and the precession of simulacra. In T. Docherty (Ed.), Postmodernism: A reader (pp. 194–199). New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baudrillard, J. (2006). Simulacra and simulation. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bhabha, H. K. (1994). The location of culture. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Binford, P. E., & Eisworth, S. (2013). The growing gap: The origin of Theory & Research in Social Education. Theory & Research in Social Education, 41(4), 457–475.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bloom, L. R. (1998). The politics of difference and multicultural feminism: Reconceptualizing education for democracy. Theory & Research in Social Education, 26(1), 30–49.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bogard, W. (1996). The simulation of surveillance: Hypercontrol in telematic societies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buchanan, I. (2018). Situated knowledge. In A dictionary of critical theory (2nd ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press. Retrieved from http://www.oxfordreference.com.ezproxy.library.ubc.ca/view/10.1093/acref/9780198794790.001.0001/acref-9780198794790-e-789.

  • Camicia, S. P. (2016). Critical democratic education and LGBTQ-inclusive curriculum: Opportunities and constraints. New York and London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cary, L. J. (2001). The refusals of citizenship: Normalizing practices in social educational discourses. Theory & Research in Social Education, 29(3), 405–430.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cary, L. J. (2003). Unhomely spaces and deviant subjectivity: The sociohistorical homelessness of female juvenile offenders. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 16(4), 587–602.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cary, L. J. (2006a). Within and against citizenship: Bad girls in deviant subject position. In A. Segall, E. Heilman, & C. Cherryholmes (Eds.), Social studies—The next generation: Re-searching in the postmodern (pp. 47–60). New York: Peter Lang.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cary, L. J. (2006b). Curriculum spaces: Discourse, postmodern theory and educational research (Vol. 16). New York: Peter Lang.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cary, L., & Mutua, K. M. (2010). Postcolonial narratives: Discourse and epistemological spaces. Journal of Curriculum Theorizing, 26(2), 62–77.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chambers, D. (2001). Representing the family. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chandler, P., & McKnight, D. (2009). The failure of social education in the United States: A critique of teaching the national story from “white” colourblind eyes. Journal for Critical Education Policy Studies, 7, 217–248.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cherryholmes, C. H. (1980). Social knowledge and citizenship education: Two views of truth and criticism. Curriculum Inquiry, 10(2), 115–141.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cherryholmes, C. H. (1982). Discourse and criticism in the social studies classroom. Theory and Research in Social Education, 9(4), 17–55.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cherryholmes, C. H. (1985). Language and discourse in social studies education. Social Education, 49(5), 395–399.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cherryholmes, C. H. (1987). A social project for curriculum: Post-structural perspectives. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 19(4), 295–316.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cherryholmes, C. (1988). Power and criticism: Poststructural investigations in education. New York: Teachers College Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cherryholmes, C. H. (2006). Researching social studies in the postmodern: An introduction. In A. Segall, E. Heilman, & C. Cherryholmes (Eds.), Social studies—The next generation: Re-searching in the postmodern (pp. 3–12). New York: Peter Lang.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crocco, M. S. (2002). Homophobic hallways: Is anyone listening? Theory & Research in Social Education, 30(2), 217–232.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crocco, M. S. (2006a). Gender and social education: What’s the problem? In E. W. Ross (Ed.), The social studies curriculum: Purposes, problems, and possibilities (3rd ed., pp. 171–196). New York: State University of New York Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crocco, M. S. (2006b). The invisible hand of theory in social studies education. In A. Segall, E. Heilman, & C. Cherryholmes (Eds.), Social studies—The next generation: Re-searching in the postmodern (pp. 231–236). New York: Peter Lang.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crocco, M. S. (2008a). Reimagining citizenship education: Gender, sexuality, and the social studies. In B. C. Rubin & J. M. Giarelli (Eds.), Civic education for diverse citizens in global times: Rethinking theory and practice (pp. 9–24). New York: Psychology Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crocco, M. S. (2008b). Gender and sexuality in the social studies (Chapter 11). In Handbook of research in social studies education (p. 172). New York and London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crocco, M. S. (2018). Gender and sexuality in history education. In The Wiley international handbook of history teaching and learning (pp. 335–364). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Debord, G. (1990). Comments on the society of the spectacle. London: Verso.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deleuze, G., & Guattari, F. (1987). A thousand plateaus (B. Massumi, Trans.). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Delgado, R. (1999). Citizenship. In R. D. Torres, L. F. Miron, & J. X. Inda (Eds.), Race, identity, and citizenship: A reader (pp. 247–252). Malden, MA: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Derrida, J. (1979). Spurs: Nietzsce’s styles (B. Harlow, Trans.). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dewey, J. (1916/2004). Democracy and education: An introduction to the philosophy of education. New Delhi: Aakar Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Doll, W. E., Jr. (1993). A post-modern perspective on curriculum. New York: Teachers College Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fairclough, N. (1995). Critical discourse analysis: The critical study of language. Longman: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Felman, S. (1992). Education and crisis. In S. Felman & D. Laub (Eds.), Testimony: Crisis of witnessing in literature, psychoanalysis, and history (pp. 1–56). New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foucault, M. (1977). Discipline and punish: The birth of the prison (A. Sheridan, Trans.). New York: Pantheon Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foucault, M. (1983). Discourses & truth (Lecture). Retrieved from http://www.lib.berkeley.edu/MRC/foucault/parrhesia.html.

  • Freire, P. (1973). Pedagogy of the oppressed. New York: Seabury Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garrett, H. J. (2011). The routing and re-routing of difficult knowledge: Social studies teachers encounter When the Levees Broke. Theory & Research in Social Education, 39(3), 320–347. https://doi.org/10.1080/00933104.2011.10473458.

  • Gaudelli, W., & Heilman, E. (2009). Reconceptualizing geography as democratic global citizenship education. Teachers College Record, 111(11), 2647–2677.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilbert, R. J. (1985). Social knowledge, action and the curriculum. Social Education, 49(5), 380–383.

    Google Scholar 

  • Giroux, H. A. (1982). Culture and rationality in Frankfurt School thought: Ideological foundations for a theory of social education. Theory and Research in Social Education, 9(4), 17–55.

    Google Scholar 

  • Giroux, H. A. (1983). Theory and resistance in education. London: Heinemann Educational Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Giroux, H. A. (1985). Teachers as transformative intellectuals. Social Education, 49(5), 376–379.

    Google Scholar 

  • Giroux, H. A. (1988). Schooling and the struggle for public life: Critical pedagogy in the modern age. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Giroux, H. A., & McLaren, P. (1986). Teacher education and the politics of engagement: The case for democratic schooling. Harvard Education Review, 56(3), 213–238.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haraway, D. (1991). Simians, cyborgs, and women: The reinvention of nature. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harvey, D. (2001). Spaces of capital: Towards a critical geography. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heilman, E. E. (2006). Critical liberal and poststructural challenges for global education. In A. Segall, E. Heilman, & C. Cherryholmes (Eds.), Social studies—The next generation: Re-searching in the postmodern (pp. 189–208). New York: Peter Lang.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heilman, E. E. (2008). Including voices from the world through global citizenship education. Social Studies and the Young Learner, 20(4), 30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heilman, E. E., Amthor, R. F., & Missias, M. T. (Eds.). (2010). Social studies and diversity education: What we do and why we do it. New York and London: Taylor & Francis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heilman, E. E., & Segall, A. (2006). Social studies research in the context of intellectual thought. In A. Segall, E. Heilman, & C. Cherryholmes (Eds.), Social studies—The next generation: Re-searching in the postmodern (pp. 13–24). New York: Peter Lang.

    Google Scholar 

  • Helfenbein, R. J., Jr. (2004). A radical geography: Curriculum theory, performance, and landscape. JCT, 20(3), 67.

    Google Scholar 

  • Helfenbein, R. J., Jr. (2006). Space, place, and identity in the teaching of history: Using critical geography to teach in the American South. In A. Segall, E. Heilman, & C. Cherryholmes (Eds.), Social studies—The next generation: Re-searching in the postmodern (pp. 11–124). New York: Peter Lang.

    Google Scholar 

  • Helfenbein, R. J., Jr., (2010). Thinking through scale: Critical geography and curriculum spaces. In Curriculum studies handbook: The next moment (pp. 304–317). New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hicks, S. R. (2011). Explaining postmodernism: Skepticism and socialism from Rousseau to Foucault (Expanded ed.). Scholargy Publishing, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hicks, S. R. (2018). Explaining postmodernism in 2018. A talk at University of British Columbia Free Speech Club, Vancouver, Canada. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-BGbHG63x8w&t=6982s.

  • Jenkins, K. (1995). On what is history? From Carr and Elton to Rorty and White. London, England: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kincheloe, J. L. (2006). Social studies in flux: In pursuit of a new rigor, criticality, and practicality. In A. Segall, E. Heilman, & C. Cherryholmes (Eds.), Social studies—The next generation: Re-searching in the postmodern (pp. 211–216). New York: Peter Lang.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kincheloe, J., & Berry. K. (2004). Rigour and complexity in educational research: Conceptualizing the bricolage. New York, NY: Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krishnamurti, J. (1953). Education and the significance of life. London: Victor Gollancz Ltd.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krishnamurti, J. (1954). The first and last freedom [foreword by Aldous Huxley]. New York: Harper and Brothers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kumar, A. (2009). Social studies in the postmodern world: An essay review. Education Review: A Journal of Book Reviews, 12(10). Available online http://www.edrev.info/essays/v12n10index.html.

  • Kumar, A. (2013). Curriculum as meditative inquiry. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kumar, A. (2014). Meditative education: A proposal for the existential renewal of teacher education in the 21st century. In M. J. Harkins & Z. Barchuk (Eds.), Conversations with international teacher educators: Teaching in a global world (E-Book). Halifax: Faculty of Education, Mount Saint Vincent University. http://www.msvu.ca/en/home/programsdepartments/education/facultyresearch/drmaryjaneharkins/teachingandlearninginaglobalage/default.aspx.

  • Kumar, A., & Downey, A. (2018). Teaching as meditative inquiry: A dialogical exploration. Journal of the Canadian Association for Curriculum Studies, 16(2), 52–75. Available online at https://jcacs.journals.yorku.ca/index.php/jcacs/article/view/40339/36397.

  • Levstik, L. S. (2016). Outside over there: My book house divides the world, 1919–1954. Theory & Research in Social Education, 44(4), 455–478. https://doi.org/10.1080/00933104.2016.1209450.

  • Loutzenheiser, L. W. (2006). Gendering social studies: Queering social education. In A. Segall, E. Heilman, & C. Cherryholmes (Eds.), Social studies—The next generation: Re-searching in the postmodern (pp. 61–76). New York: Peter Lang.

    Google Scholar 

  • Loutzenheiser, L. W. (2010). Can we learn queerly? Normativity and social justice pedagogies. In Social justice pedagogy across the curriculum (pp. 137–159). New York & London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Loutzenheiser, L. W. (2014). The language of gender, sex, and sexuality and youth experiences in schools. In E. W. Ross (Ed.), The social studies curriculum: Purposes, problems, and possibilities (4th ed., pp. 227–246). New York: State University of New York Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Loutzenheiser, L. W. (2015). ‘Who are you calling a problem?’: Addressing transphobia and homophobia through school policy. Critical Studies in Education, 56(1), 99–115.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lyon, D. (1994). The electronic eye: The rise of surveillance society. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lyotard, J. F. (1984). The postmodern condition: A report on knowledge (G. Bennington & B. Massumi, Trans.). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marsh, M., & Turner-Vorbeck, T. (2010). (Mis) Understanding families. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Massey, D. (1995). The conceptualization of place. In D. Massey & P. Jess (Eds.), A place in the world? Places, cultures, and globalization (pp. 45–85). New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCoy, K., Tuck, E., & McKenzie, M. (Eds.). (2016). Land education: Rethinking pedagogies of place from indigenous, postcolonial, and decolonizing perspectives. London and New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • McLaren, P. (1995). Critical pedagogy and predatory culture: Oppositional politics in a postmodern era. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Merryfield, M. M. (2001). Moving the centre of global education: From imperial worldviews that divide the world to double consciousness, contrapuntal pedagogy, hybridity, and cross-cultural competence. In W. B. Stanley (Ed.), Social studies: Research, priorities and prospects (pp. 197–208). Greenwich, CT: Information Age Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Merryfield, M. M. (2006). Whose worldview? Representation and reality in the social studies. In A. Segall, E. Heilman, & C. Cherryholmes (Eds.), Social studies—The next generation: Re-searching in the postmodern (pp. 217–221). New York: Peter Lang.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, J. (2010). Postmodernism. In C. Kridel (Ed.), Encylopedia of curriculum studies. Thousand Oaks: SAGE.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Council for the Social Studies. (1994). Expectations of excellence: Curriculum standards for social studies. Washington, DC: National Council for the Social Studies.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nelson, J. L. (2001). Defining social studies. In W. B. Stanley (Ed.), Critical issues in social studies research for the 21st century (pp. 15–38). Greenwich, CT: Information Age Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nelson, J. L., & Stanley, W. B. (2013). Critical studies and social education: 40 years of TRSE. Theory & Research in Social Education, 41(4), 438–456.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ong, A. (1999). Cultural citizenship as subject making: Immigrants negotiate racial and cultural boundaries in the United States. In R. D. Torres, L. F. Miron, & J. X. Inda (Eds.), Race, identity, and citizenship: A reader (pp. 262–294). Malden, MA: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Osler, A. (2015). Human rights education, postcolonial scholarship, and action for social Justice. Theory & Research in Social Education, 43(2), 244–274. https://doi.org/10.1080/00933104.2015.1034393.

  • Patterson, T. (2015). The transformative power of travel? Four social studies teachers reflect on their international professional development. Theory & Research in Social Education, 43(3), 345–371. https://doi.org/10.1080/00933104.2015.1064504.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pinar, W. F. (1994). Autobiography, sexuality, and politics: Essays in curriculum theory 1972–1992. New York: Peter Lang.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pinar, W. F. (2011). The character of curriculum studies: Bildung, currere, and the recurrent question of the subject. New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pinar, W. F. (2012). What is curriculum theory? (2nd ed.). New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pinar, W. F., Reynolds, W. M., Slattery, P., & Taubman, P. M. (1995). Understanding curriculum: An introduction to historical and contemporary curriculum discourses. New York: Peter Lang.

    Google Scholar 

  • Popkewitz, T. S. (1991). A political sociology of educational reform: Power/knowledge in teaching, teacher education, and research. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Popkewitz, T. S. (1998). The culture of redemption and the administration of freedom as research. Review of Educational Research, 68(1), 1–34.

    Google Scholar 

  • Popkewitz, T. S., & Brennan, M. (1998). Foucault’s challenge: Discourse, knowledge, and power in education. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pratt, M. L. (1992). Imperial eyes: Travel writing and transculturation. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rabehl, G. W. (2006). Space, place, and identity in the teaching of history: Using critical geography to teach in the American South. In A. Segall, E. Heilman, & C. Cherryholmes (Eds.), Social studies—The next generation: Re-searching in the postmodern (pp. 141–152). New York: Peter Lang.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reichenbach, R. (1998). The postmodern self and the problem of developing a democratic mind. Theory & Research in Social Education, 26(2), 226–237.

    Google Scholar 

  • Richardson, G. H., & Blades, D. (2006). Troubling the canon of citizenship education. New York, NY: Lang.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rodriguez, J. M. (2003). Queer Latinidad: Identity practices, discursive spaces. New York: New York University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sack, R. D. (1997). Homo geographicus: A framework for action, awareness, and moral concern. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmeichel, M. (2011). Feminism, neoliberalism, and social studies. Theory & Research in Social Education, 39, 6–31. https://doi.org/10.1080/00933104.2011.10473445.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schmeichel, M. (2015). Skirting around critical feminist rationales for teaching women in social studies. Theory & Research in Social Education, 43(1), 1–27. https://doi.org/10.1080/00933104.2014.1002648.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt, S. J. (2010). Queering social studies: The role of social studies in normalizing citizens and sexuality in the common good. Theory & Research in Social Education, 38, 314–335. https://doi.org/10.1080/00933104.2010.10473429.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Segall, A. (1999). Critical history: Implications for history/social studies education. Theory & Research in Social Education, 27, 358–374.

    Google Scholar 

  • Segall, A. (2006a). What is the purpose of teaching a discipline, anyway? The case of history. In A. Segall, E. E. Heilman, & C. H. Cherryholmes (Eds.), Social studies—The next generation: Re-searching in the postmodern (pp. 125–140). New York: Peter Lang.

    Google Scholar 

  • Segall, A. (2006b). Critical social studies: Where are we now and where do we go from here? In A. Segall, E. E. Heilman, & C. H. Cherryholmes (Eds.), Social studies—The next generation: Re-searching in the postmodern (pp. 247–250). New York: Peter Lang.

    Google Scholar 

  • Segall, A. (2012). Exploring the pedagogical nature of historical texts: Implications for classroom teaching. HSSE Online: Research and Practice in Humanities & Social Studies Education, 1(1), 27–33.

    Google Scholar 

  • Segall, A. (2013). Revitalizing critical discourses in social education: Opportunities for a more complexified (un) knowing. Theory & Research in Social Education, 41(4), 476–493.

    Google Scholar 

  • Segall, A., & Heilman, E. E. (2006). Preface. In A. Segall, E. E. Heilman, & C. H. Cherryholmes (Eds.), Social studies—The next generation: Re-searching in the postmodern (pp. VII–IX). New York: Peter Lang.

    Google Scholar 

  • Segall, A., Heilman, E. E., & Cherryholmes, C. H. (Eds.). (2006). Social studies—The next generation: Re-searching in the postmodern. New York: Peter Lang.

    Google Scholar 

  • Segall, A., & Helfenbein, R. J. (2008). Research on K-12 geography education. Handbook of research in social studies education (p. 259). New York: Rutledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seixas, P. (2000). Schweigen! Die kinder! Or, does postmodern history have a place in the schools? In P. N. Steams, P. Seixas, & S. Wineburg (Eds.), Knowing, teaching and learning history (pp. 19–37). New York: New York University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shinew, D. (2006). Citizenship and belonging: Constructing “a sense of place and a place that makes sense”. In A. Segall, E. Heilman, & C. Cherryholmes (Eds.), Social studies—The next generation: Re-searching in the postmodern (pp. 77–94). New York: Peter Lang.

    Google Scholar 

  • Slattery, P. (2013). Curriculum development in the postmodern era: Teaching and learning in an age of accountability (3rd ed.). New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, R. W. (1996). Schooling and the formation of male students’ gender identities. Theory & Research in Social Education, 24(1), 54–70.

    Google Scholar 

  • Soja, E. W. (1989). Postmodern geographies: The reassertion of space in critical social theory. New York: Verso.

    Google Scholar 

  • Soja, E. W. (1996). Thirdspace: Journeys to Los Angeles and other real-and-imagined places. Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spivak, G. C. (1993). Outside in the teaching machine. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stanley, W. B. (1985). Social reconstructionism for today’s social education. Social Education, 49(5), 384–389.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stanley, W. B. (1992). Curriculum for utopia: Social reconstructionism and critical pedagogy in the postmodern era. Albany: SUNY Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stanley, W. B., & Nelson, J. (2013). A memorial to Cleo Cherryholmes, founding editor of TRSE. Theory & Research in Social Education, 41(4), 437.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sumara, D., & Davis, B. (1999). Interrupting heteronormativity: Toward a queer curriculum theory. Curriculum Inquiry, 29(2), 191–208.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taubman, P. (2009). Teaching by numbers: Deconstructing the discourse of standards and accountability in education. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Terry, J. (1991). Theorizing deviant historiography. Differences: A Journal of Feminist Cultural Studies, 3(2), 55–74.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trofanenko, B. (2006). The public museum and identity: Or, the question of belonging. In A. Segall, E. Heilman, & C. Cherryholmes (Eds.), Social studies—The next generation: Re-searching in the postmodern (pp. 95–110). New York: Peter Lang.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trofanenko, B. (2010). The educational promise of public history museum exhibits. Theory and Research in Social Education, 38(2), 270–284.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trofanenko, B. (2011). On difficult history displayed: The pedagogical challenges of interminable learning. Museum Management and Curation, 26(5), 481–495.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trofanenko, B. (2013). Introduction: Coming to the table to talk. Museum Management & Curatorship, 28(3), 251–254.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trofanenko, B. (2015). On the museum as a practiced place: Or, reconsidering museums and history education. In R. Sandwell & A. von Heyking (Eds.), Becoming a history teacher in Canada: Sustaining practices in historical thinking and knowing. Toronto, ON: University of Toronto Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trofanenko, B. (2016). Public pedagogy in a museum: CMIP21, for example. In V. Gosselin & P. Livingstone (Eds.), Museums and historical consciousness. Vancouver, BC: University of British Columbia Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tuck, E., & McKenzie, M. (2015). Place in research: Theory, methodology, and methods (Vol. 9). New York and London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tucker, J., & Evans, A. (1996). The challenge of a global age. In B. Massialas & R. Allen (Eds.), Crucial issues in teaching social studies K-12 (pp. 181–218). Belmont, CA: Wadsworth Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Turner-Vorbeck, T. A. (2005). Expanding multicultural education to include family diversity. Multicultural Education, 13(2), 6–10.

    Google Scholar 

  • Turner-Vorbeck, T. A. (2006). Representations of family in curriculum: A poststructural analysis. In A. Segall, E. Heilman, & C. Cherryholmes (Eds.), Social studies—The next generation: Re-searching in the postmodern (pp. 153–170). New York: Peter Lang.

    Google Scholar 

  • Turner-Vorbeck, T. A., & Marsh, M. M. (Eds.). (2008). Other kinds of families: Embracing diversity in schools. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vinson, K. D. (1999). National curriculum standards and social studies education: Dewey, Freire, Foucault, and the construction of a radical critique. Theory & Research in Social Education, 27(3), 296–328.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vinson, K. D. (2006). Social studies in the age of image: Surveillance-spectacle and the imperatives of ‘seeing’ citizenship education. In A. Segall, E. Heilman, & C. Cherryholmes (Eds.), Social studies—The next generation: Re-searching in the postmodern (pp. 27–36). New York: Peter Lang.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vinson, K. D., & Ross, E. W. (2003). Image and education: Teaching in the face of new disciplinarity. New York: Peter Lang.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vinson, K. D., & Ross, E. W. (2007). Education and the new disciplinarity: Surveillance, spectacle, and the case of SBER. In E. W. Ross & R. Gibson (Eds.), Neoliberalism and education reform (pp. 59–86). New York, NY: Hampton Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vinson, K. D., & Ross. E. W. (2012). Rethinking citizenship: A theory and practice of contemporary critical education. London, England: Continuum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walker, T. L. (2006). Adventures in metropolis: Popular culture in social studies. In A. Segall, E. Heilman, & C. Cherryholmes (Eds.), Social studies—The next generation: Re-searching in the postmodern (pp. 171–188). New York: Peter Lang.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walker, T. L. (2010). The red pill: Social studies, media texts, and literacies. Learning, Media and Technology, 35(1), 1–14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walker, T. L., & Taylor, C. M. (2014). A collaborative autoethnographic search for authenticity amidst the “fake real”. The Qualitative Report, 19(25), 1.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walker, T. L., & Taylor, C. M. (2015). Collaborative autoethnography: The method is the message. In C. White (Ed.), Critical Qualitative Research in Social Education (pp. 61–78). Greenwich, CT: Information Age Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Warner, M.(1993). Fear of a queer planet: Queer politics and social theory. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weil, S. (1949/2002). The need for roots. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Werner, W. (2002). Reading visual texts. Theory & Research in Social Education, 30(3), 401–428.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wexler, P. (1985). Social change and the practice of social education. Social Education, 49(5), 390–394.

    Google Scholar 

  • White, C., & Walker, T. (2007). Tooning in: Essays on popular culture and education. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • White, C., & Walker, T. (2012). Media and popular culture. In W. B. Russell (Ed.), Contemporary social studies: An essential reader (pp. 441–466). Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Woodson, A. N. (2016). We’re just ordinary people: Messianic master narratives and Black youths’ civic agency. Theory & Research in Social Education, 44(2), 184–211. https://doi.org/10.1080/00933104.2016.1170645.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ashwani Kumar .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Kumar, A. (2019). Postmodern Turn in North American Social Studies Education: Considering Identities, Contexts, and Discourses. In: Curriculum in International Contexts. Curriculum Studies Worldwide. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-01983-9_7

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-01983-9_7

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-01982-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-01983-9

  • eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics