Skip to main content

Feeding Genetic Heterogeneity via a Smart Mutation Operator in the Memetic Phase Retrieval Approach

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Toward a Science Campus in Milan (CDIP 2017)

Included in the following conference series:

  • 257 Accesses

Abstract

A memetic algorithm is a stochastic optimization method obtained by hybridizing an evolutionary approach with common deterministic optimization procedures. The recently introduced Memetic Phase Retrieval (MPR) approach exploits this synergy to face the so-called phase retrieval problem in Coherent Diffraction Imaging (CDI). Here we focus on the development of a smart mutation genetic operator; our aim is the improvement of MPR performance by continually feeding with relevant information the genetic heritage of the population of candidate solutions. Remarkably, statistical tests on synthetic CDI data performed using MPR enhanced via a smart mutation operator reveal a smaller reconstruction error with respect to an MPR implementation supplied with a blind random mutation only.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. D. Sayre, Some implications of a theorem due to Shannon. Acta Crystallogr. 5(6), 843 (1952)

    Google Scholar 

  2. C. Fienup, J. Dainty, Phase retrieval and image reconstruction for astronomy. in Image Recovery: Theory and Application (1987), pp. 231–275

    Google Scholar 

  3. L. De Caro, E. Carlino, F.A. Vittoria, D. Siliqi, C. Giannini, Keyhole electron diffractive imaging (KEDI). Acta Crystallogr. Sect. A 68, 687–7026 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Y. Shechtman, Y.C. Eldar, O. Cohen, H.N. Chapman, J. Miao, M. Segev, Phase retrieval with application to optical imaging: a contemporary overview. IEEE Signal Process. Mag. 32(3), 87–109 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  5. L. De Caro, E. Carlino, D. Siliqi, C. Giannini, Coherent diffractive imaging: from nanometric down to picometric resolution, in Handbook of Coherent-Domain Optical Methods (Springer, 2013), pp. 291–314

    Google Scholar 

  6. M. Altarelli, R. Brinkmann, M. Chergui, W. Decking, B. Dobson, S. Düsterer, G. Grübel, W. Graeff, H. Graafsma, J. Hajdu et al., The European X-ray free-electron laser, in Technical Design Report, DESY 97 (2006), pp. 1–26

    Google Scholar 

  7. S. Marchesini, Invited article: a unified evaluation of iterative projection algorithms for phase retrieval. Rev. Sci. Instrum. 78(1), 011301 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  8. J.R. Fienup, Phase retrieval algorithms: a comparison. Appl. Opt. 21(15), 2758–2769 (1982)

    Google Scholar 

  9. J.R. Fienup, C.C. Wackerman, Phase-retrieval stagnation problems and solutions. J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 3(11), 1897–1907 (1986)

    Google Scholar 

  10. A. Colombo, D.E. Galli, L. De Caro, F. Scattarella, E. Carlino, Facing the phase problem in coherent diffractive imaging via memetic algorithms. Sci. Rep. 7(42236) (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  11. D.E. Goldberg, Genetic Algorithms in Search, Optimization and Machine Learning, 1st edn. (Addison-Wesley Longman Publishing Co. Inc., Boston, MA, USA, 1989). ISBN: 0201157675

    Google Scholar 

  12. P. Moscato et al., On evolution, search, optimization, genetic algorithms and martial arts: towards memetic algorithms, in Caltech Concurrent Computation Program, C3P Report (1989), p. 826

    Google Scholar 

  13. R. Storn, K. Price, Differential evolution—A simple and efficient heuristic for global optimization over continuous spaces. J. Glob. Optim. 11(4), 341–359 (1997)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We acknowledge L. De Caro, E. Carlino and F. Scattarella for useful discussions. This work was supported by the NOXSS PRIN (2012Z3N9R9) project. We acknowledge the CINECA and Regione Lombardia LISA award LI05p-PUMAS, the CINECA ISCRA–C award IMAGES and the CINECA ISCRA–B award MEMETICO for the availability of high performance computing resources and support.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Alessandro Colombo .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Mauri, M., Galli, D.E., Colombo, A. (2018). Feeding Genetic Heterogeneity via a Smart Mutation Operator in the Memetic Phase Retrieval Approach. In: Bortignon, P., Lodato, G., Meroni, E., Paris, M., Perini, L., Vicini, A. (eds) Toward a Science Campus in Milan. CDIP 2017. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-01629-6_15

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics