Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Évaluation des programmes de formation en simulation

  • Chapter
La simulation en santé De la théorie à la pratique

  • 1237 Accesses

Résumé

Quelle que soit sa méthode, son moment, sa finalité, l’évaluation a une place incontournable dans le processus d’enseignement. Elle permet de confirmer que les objectifs pédagogiques ont été atteints totalement, partiellement ou pas du tout. Cette évaluation du résultat de l’action pédagogique (produit) doit aujourd’hui être complétée avec la même rigueur par l’évaluation du moyen pédagogique qu’est la simulation (processus).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Références

  1. Kirkpatrick D (1967) Evaluation of Training. In: Craig R, Bittel L, eds. McGraw-Hill, New York, p 131–7

    Google Scholar 

  2. Kirkpatrick DL (1998) Evaluating Training Programs: The Four Levels. 2nd ed. Berrett-Koehler Publishers, Inc, San Francisco

    Google Scholar 

  3. Phillips JJ (1997) Return on investment in training and performance improvement programs. A step-by-step manual for calculating the financial return. Houston, TX: Gulf Publishing Ed

    Google Scholar 

  4. Russ-Eft D, Preskill H (2001) Evaluation in organizations: a systematic approach to enhancing learning performance and change. Basis Books, Cambridge, MA

    Google Scholar 

  5. Kraiger K (2002) Creating, Implementing and Managing Effective Training and Development. State-of-the-Art Lessons for Practice: Jossey-Bass, San Francisco

    Google Scholar 

  6. Haute Autorité de Santé (2012) Guide de bonnes pratiques en matière de simulatin en santé. HAS-Santé, Saint-Denis

    Google Scholar 

  7. Hutchinson L (1999) Evaluating and researching the effectiveness of educational interventions. BMJ. 318(7193): 1267–9

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Norman GR (2000) Reflections on BEME. Med Teach 22(2): 141–4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Norman G (2003) RCT = results confounded and trivial: the perils of grand educational experiments. Med Educ 37(7): 582–4

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Haynes AB, Weiser TG, Berry WR, et al. (2009) A surgical safety checklist to reduce morbidity and mortality in a global population. N Engl J Med 360(5): 491–9

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Cook DA, Hatala R, Brydges R, et al. (2011) Technology-enhanced simulation for health professions education: a systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA 306(9): 978–88

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Issenberg SB, McGaghie WC, Petrusa ER, et al. (2005) Features and uses of high-fidelity medical simulations that lead to effective learning: a BEME systematic review. Med Teach 27(1): 10–28

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Hammick M, Dornan T, Steinert Y (2010) Conducting a best evidence systematic review. Part 1: From idea to data coding. BEME Guide No 13. Med Teach 32(1): 3–15

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Yardley S, Dornan T (2012) Kirkpatrick’s levels and education “evidence”. Medical Education 46(1): 97–106

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. BEME. Best Evidence Medical Education coding sheet

    Google Scholar 

  16. Kneebone R, Kidd J, Nestel D, et al. (2002) An innovative model for teaching and learning clinical procedures. Med Educ 36(7): 628–34

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Weller J, Wilson L, Robinson B (2003) Survey of change in practice following simulation-based training in crisis management. Anaesthesia 58(5): 471–3

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Barsuk JH, Cohen ER, McGaghie WC, Wayne DB (2010) Long-term retention of central venous catheter insertion skills after simulation-based mastery learning. Academic Medicine 85(10): S9

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Barsuk JH, McGaghie WC, Cohen ER, et al. (2009) Simulation-based mastery learning reduces complications during central venous catheter insertion in a medical intensive care unit*. Critical care medicine. 37(10): 2697

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Blike GT, Christoffersen K, Cravero JP et al. (2005) A method for measuring system safety and latent errors associated with pediatric procedural sedation. Anesthesia & Analgesia 101(1): 48

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Barsuk JH, Cohen ER, Feinglass J, et al. (2009) Use of simulation-based education to reduce catheter-related bloodstream infections. Archives of Internal Medicine 169(15): 1420

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Cohen ER, Feinglass J, Barsuk JH, et al. (2010) Cost savings from reduced catheter-related bloodstream infection after simulation-based education for residents in a medical intensive care unit. Simulation in Healthcare 5(2): 98

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Holton EF (1996) The flawed four-level evaluation model Human Resource Development Quarterly 7: 5–21

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Alliger GM, Janak EA (1989) Kirkpatrick’s levels of training criteria: thirty years later. Personnel Psychology 42(2): 331

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. La lettre du conseil scientifique. INSERM. Juin 2012(9): 1–10

    Google Scholar 

  26. Dougherty D, Conway PH (2008) The ‘3T’s’ road map to transform US health care: the ‘how’ of high-quality care. JAMA 299(19): 2319–21

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. McGaghie WC (2010) Medical education research as translational science. Sci Transi Med 2(19): 19cm8

    Google Scholar 

  28. McGaghie WC, Draycott TJ, Dunn WE, et al. (2011) Evaluating the impact of simulation on translational patient outcomes. Simul Healthc 6 Suppl: S42–7

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Département d’anesthésie — CHRU de Tours, Département de psychologie, E.A. 2114, Université François-Rabelais de Tours, 2 bis Boulevard Tonnelé, 37000, Tours, France

    B. Chiron

  2. Department of Anesthesiology, The Ottawa Hospital Civic Campus, 1053 Carling Avenue Room B310, Ottawa, ON, K1Y 4E9, Canada

    S. Bromley

  3. Service de cardiologie, CHRU de Tours, 2 bis Boulevard Tonnelé, 37000, Tours, France

    A. Ros

  4. Service d’Anesthésiologie, Hôpitaux universitaires de Genève, Rue Gabrielle-Perret-Gentil 4, 1211, Genève 14, Switzerland

    G. Savoldelli

Authors
  1. B. Chiron
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. S. Bromley
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. A. Ros
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. G. Savoldelli
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to B. Chiron .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Centre de Compétences et de Simulation, l’Université d’Ottawa, Canada

    Sylvain Boet (Co-Directeur du Fellowship en Simulation et Éducation Médicale, Chercheur Sénior à l’Académie pour L’Innovation en Éducation Médicale (AIME) (Co-Directeur du Fellowship en Simulation et Éducation Médicale, Chercheur Sénior à l’Académie pour L’Innovation en Éducation Médicale (AIME)

  2. Hôpitaux Universitaires de Genève HUG, Rue Gabrielle-Perret-Gentil 4, 1211, Genève 14, Suisse

    Georges Savoldelli

  3. Pôle Anesthésie et réanimation, CHU et Université d’Angers, 4, rue Larrey, 49933, Angers Cedex 9, France

    Jean-Claude Granry

  4. Faculté de Médecine, l’Université d’Ottawa, Canada

    Sylvain Boet (Co-Directeur du Fellowship en Simulation et Éducation Médicale, Chercheur Sénior à l’Académie pour L’Innovation en Éducation Médicale (AIME) (Co-Directeur du Fellowship en Simulation et Éducation Médicale, Chercheur Sénior à l’Académie pour L’Innovation en Éducation Médicale (AIME)

  5. Institut de Recherche de l’Hôpital d’Ottawa, L’Hôpital d’Ottawa, 501 Chemin Smyth Road, Ottawa, Ontario, K1H 8L6, Canada

    Sylvain Boet (Co-Directeur du Fellowship en Simulation et Éducation Médicale, Chercheur Sénior à l’Académie pour L’Innovation en Éducation Médicale (AIME) (Co-Directeur du Fellowship en Simulation et Éducation Médicale, Chercheur Sénior à l’Académie pour L’Innovation en Éducation Médicale (AIME)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Springer-Verlag Paris

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Chiron, B., Bromley, S., Ros, A., Savoldelli, G. (2013). Évaluation des programmes de formation en simulation. In: Boet, S., Savoldelli, G., Granry, JC. (eds) La simulation en santé De la théorie à la pratique. Springer, Paris. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-2-8178-0469-9_29

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-2-8178-0469-9_29

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Paris

  • Print ISBN: 978-2-8178-0468-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-2-8178-0469-9

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation