Résumé
Les méthodes d’élastographie estiment la dureté (ou élasticité) des tissus ou bien leurs déplacements relatifs pour en fournir une image d’élasticité ou de déformation, information historiquement évaluée par la palpation d’élément important du diagnostic clinique. Néanmoins, l’élasticité évaluée par l’examen clinique dépend de l’opérateur, de la taille et du siège (profondeur) de la lésion ainsi que de la structure mammaire.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Références
Itoh A, Ueno E, Tohno E et al. (2006) Breast disease: clinical application of US elastography for diagnosis. Radiology 239: 341–350
Tanter M, Bercoff J, Athanasiou A et al. (2008). Quantitative assessment of breast lesion viscoelasticity: initial clinical results using supersonic shear imaging. Ultrasound Med Biol 34: 1373–1386
Tardivon A, El Khoury C, Thibault F, Wyler et al. (2007) Elastography of the breast: a prospective study of 122 lesions. J Radiol 88: 657–662
Zhi H, Ou B, Luo BM et al. (2007) Comparison of ultrasound elastography, mammography, and sonography in the diagnosis of solid breast lesions. J Ultrasound Med 26: 807–815
Moon WK, Huang C.S, Shen WC et al. (2009) Analysis of elastographic and B-mode features at sonoelastography for breast tumor classification. Ultrasound Med Biol 35: 1794–1802
Tardivon A, Delignette A, Lemery S et al. (2006) Ultrasound elastography: Results of a French multicentric prospective study about 345 breast lesions. Communication orale ECR Vienne 2–6 mars. Eur J Radiol Abstract B-344
Scaperrotta G, Ferranti C, Costa C et al. (2008) Role of sonoelastography in non-palpable breast lesions. Eur Radiol 18: 2381–2389
Leong LC, Sim LS, Lee YS et al. (2010) Prospective study to compare the diagnostic performance of breast elastography versus conventional breast ultrasound. Clin Radiol 65: 887–894
Sadigh G, Carlos RC, Neal CH, Dwamena BA (2012) Ultrasonographic differentiation of malignant from benign breast lesions: a meta-analytic comparison of elasticity and BIRADS scoring. Breast Cancer Res Treat 133: 23–35
Thomas A, Fischer T, Frey H et al. (2006) Real-time elastography-an advanced method of ultrasound: First results in 108 patients with breast lesions. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 28: 335–340
Athanasiou A, Tardivon A, Tanter M et al. (2010) Breast lesions: quantitative elastography with supersonic shear imaging—preliminary results. Radiology 256: 297–303
Evans A, Whelehan P, Thomson K et al. (2010) Quantitative shear wave ultrasound elastography: initial experience in solid breast masses. Breast Cancer Research 12: R10
Berg WA, Cosgrove DO, Doré CJ et al. (2012) BE1 Investigators Shear-wave elastography improves the specificity of breast US: the BE1 multinational study of 939 masses. Radiology 262: 435–449
Tourasse C, Dénier JF, Awada A et al. (2012) Elastography in the assessment of sentinel lymph nodes prior to dissection. Eur J Radiol [Epub ahead of print]
Tozaki M, Isobe S, Fukuma E (2011) Preliminary study of ultrasonographic tissue quantification of the breast using the acoustic radiation force impulse (ARFI) technology. Eur J Radiol 80: e182–187
Cosgrove DO, Berg WA, Doré CJ et al. (2012) Shear wave elastography for breast masses is highly reproducible. Eur Radiol 22: 1023–1032
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2013 Springer-Verlag France, Paris
About this paper
Cite this paper
Balu-Maestro, C. (2013). L’élastographie peut-elle modifier nos stratégies ?. In: Acquis et limites en sénologie / Assets and limits in breast diseases. Springer, Paris. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-2-8178-0396-8_4
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-2-8178-0396-8_4
Publisher Name: Springer, Paris
Print ISBN: 978-2-8178-0395-1
Online ISBN: 978-2-8178-0396-8