Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Prise en charge rééducative. Quoi de neuf?

  • Chapter
Plexus brachial Actualités et perspectives

  • 335 Accesses

Résumé

Ce chapitre est consacré à l’actualité dans la rééducation des atteintes traumatiques du système nerveux périphérique. Nous avons réalisé une revue de la littérature non systématique de ces quatre dernières années (nerve injury rehabilitation). Nous n’avons pas retenu les articles concernant les aspects particuliers qui font déjà l’objet de chapitres spécifiques dans cet ouvrage (évaluation clinique, échelles d’évaluation, exploration électro physiologique, imagerie, chirurgie, douleur, appareillage et toxine botulique). Nous n’avons pas limité la revue à la seule rééducation des lésions du plexus brachial car il existe peu d’articles mais nous avons élargi aux lésions nerveuses périphériques d’origine traumatique en nous intéressant particulièrement aux thérapeutiques par le mouvement.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Références

  1. Agata N, Sasai N, Inoue-Miyazu M et al. (2009) Repetitive stretch suppresses denervation-induced atrophy of soleus muscle in rats. Muscle Nerve 39(4): 456–62

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Udina E, Puigdemasa A, Navarro X (2011) Passive and active exercise improve regeneration and muscle reinnervation after peripheral nerve injury in the rat. Muscle Nerve 43(4): 500–9

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Cunha NB, Ilha J, Centenaro LA et al. (2011) The effects of treadmill training on young and mature rats after traumatic peripheral nerve lesion. Neurosci Lett 501(1): 15–9

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. English AW, Cucoranu D, Mulligan A, Sabatier M (2009) Treadmill training enhances axon regeneration in injured mouse peripheral nerves without increased loss of topographic specificity. J. Comp Neurol 517(2): 245–55

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Bobinski F, Martins DF, Bratti T et al. (2011) Neuroprotective and neuroregenerative effects of low-intensity aerobic exercise on sciatic nerve crush injury in mice. Neuroscience 194: 337–48

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Teodori RM, Betini J, de Oliveira LS et al. (2011) Swimming exercise in the acute or late phase after sciatic nerve crush accelerates nerve regeneration. Neural Plast 783901

    Google Scholar 

  7. Dehail P, Duclos C, Barat M (2008) Electrical stimulation and muscle strengthening. Annales de Réadaptation et de Médecine Physique 51(6): 441–51

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Arakawa T, Katada A, Shigyo H et al. (2010) Electrical stimulation prevents apoptosis in denervated skeletal muscle. NeuroRehabilitation 27(2): 147–54

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Lim J-Y, Han TR (2010) Effect of electromyostimulation on apoptosis-related factors in denervation and reinnervation of rat skeletal muscles. Muscle Nerve 42(3): 422–30

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Gordon T, Udina E, Verge VMK, de Chaves EIP (2009) Brief electrical stimulation accelerates axon regeneration in the peripheral nervous system and promotes sensory axon regeneration in the central nervous system. Motor Control 13(4): 412–41

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Gordon T, Brushart TM, Chan KM (2008) Augmenting nerve regeneration with electrical stimulation. Neurol Res 30(10): 1012–22

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Lu M-C, Ho C-Y, Hsu S-F et al. (2008) Effects of electrical stimulation at different frequencies on regeneration of transected peripheral nerve. Neurorehabil Neural Repair 22(4): 367–73

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Lu M-C, Tsai C-C, Chen S-C et al. (2009) Use of electrical stimulation at different current levels to promote recovery after peripheral nerve injury in rats. J Trauma 67(5): 1066–72

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Gigo-Benato D, Russo TL, Geuna S et al. (2010) Electrical stimulation impairs early functional recovery and accentuates skeletal muscle atrophy after sciatic nerve crush injury in rats. Muscle & Nerve 41(5): 685–93

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Salmons S (2011) Is stimulation of denervated muscle contraindicated when there is potential for reinnervation? Muscle Nerve 43(2): 300

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Salmons S (2010) Is stimulation of denervated muscle contraindicated when there is potential for reinnervation? Muscle Nerve [Internet]. nov 16 [cité 2012 févr 6]; Consulté sur: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21082692

  17. Parizotto NA (2011) Is electrical stimulation a consolidated treatment for denervated muscles and functional recovery after nerve injuries? Muscle & Nerve 43(2): 299–300

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Asensio-Pinilla E, Udina E, Jaramillo J, Navarro X (2009) Electrical stimulation combined with exercise increase axonal regeneration after peripheral nerve injury. Exp Neurol 219(1): 258–65

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Mahmoudaliloo M, Bakhshipour A, Hashemi T et al. (2011) The correlation of cognitive capacity with recovery of hand sensibility after peripheral nerve injury of upper extremity. Neuro Rehabilitation 29(4): 373–9

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Rosén B, Lundborg G, Dahlin LB et al. (1994) Nerve repair: correlation of restitution of functional sensibility with specific cognitive capacities. J Hand Surg Br 19(4): 452–8

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Boender ZJ, Ultee J, Hovius SER (2010) Cognitive capacity: no association with recovery of sensibility by Semmes Weinstein test score after peripheral nerve injury of the forearm. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 63(2): 354–9

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Service de médecine physique et de réadaptation, Laboratoire HAVAE, EA6310, Hôpital J. Rebeyrol, CHU Limoges, 2, avenue Martin-Luther-King, 87042, Limoges Cedex, France

    J.-C. Daviet & J. Hamonet

  2. Service de médecine physique et de réadaptation, Hôpital J. Rebeyrol, CHU Limoges, 2, avenue Martin-Luther-King, 87042, Limoges Cedex, France

    J. Bordes & J.-Y. Salle

Authors
  1. J.-C. Daviet
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. J. Bordes
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. J. Hamonet
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. J.-Y. Salle
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to J.-C. Daviet .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2012 Springer-Verlag Paris

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Daviet, JC., Bordes, J., Hamonet, J., Salle, JY. (2012). Prise en charge rééducative. Quoi de neuf?. In: Plexus brachial Actualités et perspectives. Springer, Paris. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-2-8178-0334-0_8

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-2-8178-0334-0_8

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Paris

  • Print ISBN: 978-2-8178-0333-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-2-8178-0334-0

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation