Skip to main content

Procédures opérationnelles standards (POS)

  • Chapter
Précis d’hématologie et d’oncologie
  • 754 Accesses

Résumé

Déf.: Insertion d’une aiguille dans la cavité pleurale afin d’évacuer le liquide pleural.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Réf.

  1. Antunes G, Neville E. Management of malignant pleural effusions. Thorax 2000;55:981–983

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Bass J, White DA. Thoracocentesis in patients with hematologic malignancy: yield and safely. Chest 2005;127:2101–2105

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Erasmus JJ, Goodman PC, Patz EF. Management of malignant pleural effusions and pneumothorax. Radiol Clin North Am 2000;38:375–383

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Ferrer J, Roldan J. Clinical management of the patient with pleural effusion. Eur J Radiol 2000;34:76–86

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Tassi GF, Cardillo G, Marchetti GP et al. Diagnostic and therapeutic management of malignant pleural effusion. Ann Oncol 2006;17(suppl 2):ii11–12

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Réf.

  1. Antony VB, Loddenkemper R, Astoul P et al. Management of malignant pleural effusions. Eur Respir J 2001;18:402–419

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Antunes G, Neville E. Management of malignant pleural effusions. Thorax 2000;55:981–983

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Dikensoy O, Light RW. Alternative widely available, inexpensive agents for pleurodesis. Curr Opin Pulm Med2005;11:340–344

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Janssen JP, Collier G, Astoul P et al. Safety of pleurodesis with talc poudrage in malignant pleural effusion: aprospective cohort study. Lancet 2007;369:1535–1539

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Pollak JS. Malignant pleural effusions: treatment with tunneled long-term drainage catheters. Curr Opin Pulm Med 2002;8:302–307

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Shaw P, Agarwal R. Pleurodesis for malignant pleural effusions. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2004;CD002916

    Google Scholar 

  7. West SD, Davies RJ, Lee YC. Pleurodesis for malignant pleural effusions. Curr Opin Pulm Med 2004;10:305–310

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Réf.

  1. Adam RA, Adam YG. Malignant ascites. J Am Coll Surg 2004;198:999–1011

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Becker G, Galandi D, Blum HE. Malignant ascites: systematic review and guideline for treatment. Eur J Cancer 2006;42:589–597

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Covey AM. Management of malignant pleural effusions and ascites. J Support Oncol 2005;3:169–173

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Parsons SL, Watson SA, Steele RJ. Malignant ascites. Br J Surg 1996;83:6–14

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Runyon BA. Care of patients with ascites. N Engl J Med 1994;330:337–342

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Réf.

  1. Bain BJ. Bone marrow biopsy morbidity and mortality. Br J Haematol 2003;121:949–951

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Eikelboom JW. Bone marrow biopsy in cytopenic or anticoagulated patients. Br J Haematol 2005;129:562–563

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Hodges A, Koury MJ. Needle aspiration and biopsy in the diagnosis and monitoring of bone marrow diseases. Clin Lab Sci 1996;9:349–353

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Hyun BH, Stevenson AJ, Hanau CA. Fundamentals of bone marrow examination. Hematol Oncol Clin North Am 1994;8:651–663

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Parapia LA. Trepanning or threphines: a history of bone marrow biopsy. Br J Haematol 2007;139:14–19

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Wang J, Weiss LM, Chang KL et al. Diagnostic utility of bilateral bone marrow examination. Cancer 2002;94:1522

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Réf.

  1. Bain BJ. Diagnosis from the blood smear. N Engl J Med 2005;353:498–507

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Gulati GL, Hyun BH. Blood smear examination. Hematol Oncol Clin North Am 1994;8:631–650

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Riley RS, Hogan TF, Pavot DR et al. Performing a bone marrow examination. J Clin Lab Anal 2004;18:70–90

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Réf.

  1. Blaney SM, Poplack DG. New cytotoxic drugs for intrathecal administration. J Neurooncol 1998;38:219–223

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Chamberlain MC. Neoplastic meningitis. J Clin Oncol 2005;23:3605–3613

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Mercadante S. Controversies over spinal treatment in advanced cancer patients. Support Care Cancer 1998;6:495–502

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Roos KL. Lumbar puncture. Semin Neurol 2003;23:105–114

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Réf.

  1. Boersma RS, Jie KSG Verbon A et al. Thrombotic and infectious complications of central venous catheters in patients with hematological malignancies. Ann Oncol 2008;19:433–442

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Freytes CO. Indications and complications of intravenous devices for chemotherapy. Curr Opin Oncol 2000;12:303–307

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Higgs ZJC, Macafee DAL, Braithwaite BD et al. The Seldinger technique: 50 years on. Lancet 2005;366:1407–1409

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Kuter DJ. Thrombolic complications of central venous catheters in patients. Oncologist 2004;9:207–216

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Lee AY, Levine MN, Butler G et al. Incidence, risk factors and outcomes of catheter-related thrombosis in adult patients with cancer. J Clin Oncol 2006;24:1404–1408

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Lubelcheck RJ, Weinstein RA. Strategies for preventing catheter-related bloodstream infections: the role of new technologies. Crit Care Med 2006;34:905–907

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Vescia S, Baumgärtner AK, Jacobs VR et al. Management of venous port systems in oncology: a review of current evidence. Ann Oncol 2008;19:9–15

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Verso M, Agnelli G. Venous thromboembolism associated with long-term use of central venous catheters in cancer patients. J Clin Oncol 2003;21:3665–3675

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Réf.

  1. Chien JW. Making the most of blood cultures. Tips for optimal use of this time-honored test. Postgrad Med 1998;104:119–124, 127

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. De Marie S. New developments in the diagnosis and management of invasive fungal infections. Haematologica 2000;85:88–93

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Lamy B, Roy P, Carret G et al. What is the relevance of obtaining multiple blood samples for culture? A comprehensive model to optimize the strategy for diagnosing bacteremia. Clin Infect Dis 2002;35:842–850

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Mylotte JM, Tayara A. Blood cultures: clinical aspects and controversies. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis 2000;19:157–163

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Weinstein MP. Current blood culture methods and systems: clinical concepts, technology, and interpretation of results. Clin Infect Dis 1996;23:40–46

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2011 Springer-Verlag France, Paris

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Engelhardt, R., Engelhardt, A., Gärtner, F., Mielke, S., Frank, U., Bertz, H. (2011). Procédures opérationnelles standards (POS). In: Précis d’hématologie et d’oncologie. Springer, Paris. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-2-287-99342-8_10

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-2-287-99342-8_10

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Paris

  • Print ISBN: 978-2-287-99341-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-2-287-99342-8

Publish with us

Policies and ethics