Abstract
In the literature, most authors use the Harris (13) or the Merle d’Aubigne and Postel (MAP) score systems (17). These so called “universal scores” allow for a good appreciation of the clinical results, since they both rely on criteria that are easily reproducible and show few errors of appreciation between the different authors (which however is only true for the non-modified scores, which, in our opinion, should exclusively be applied). We rely on these two original methods for our own evaluations.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2007 Springer-Verlag France, Paris
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
(2007). Clinical Results. In: Le Béguec, P., Sieber, HP. (eds) Revision of Loose Femoral Prostheses. Springer, Paris. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-2-287-39629-8_14
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-2-287-39629-8_14
Publisher Name: Springer, Paris
Print ISBN: 978-2-287-39626-7
Online ISBN: 978-2-287-39629-8
eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)