Skip to main content

Other On/Off Control Case Studies

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
The BOXES Methodology
  • 556 Accesses

Abstract

Chapters 5 and 6 illustrate that the BOXES methodology works very well in prolonging the duration of motion of a freely hinged pole that is attached to a constantly moving cart driven by a theoretically instantly reversible motor. The algorithm reads the state variables and issues one of two possible control signals connected to the motor control system thus enforcing right/left motion. There are many other dynamic systems that are controlled in a bang-bang fashion and consequently, candidates for the BOXES methodology. This chapter describes three case studies focusing on applications in which the BOXES system learns to switch a process variable on or off based on a signature table that is populated by appropriate learning laws. The applications described in this chapter are a fedbatch bioreactor, a trash to steam plant, and a system that learns to reverse a tractor trailer.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Quiennec I, Dahhou B & Sevely Y. (1991) Theoretical and Experimental Results in Optimisation of Fedbatch Fermentation Processes. J. Systems Engineering, 1(1): 31–40.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Constantinides A, Spencer JP. & Gaden EL. (1970) Optimization of Batch Fermentation Processes. II. Optimum Temperature Profiles for Batch Penicillin Fermentations. Biotechnol Bioeng. 12: 1081–1098.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Calam CT. & Russell DW. (1973) Microbial Aspects of Fermentation Process Development. J. Appl. Chem. Biotechnol. 23: 225–237.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Williams D, Yousefpour P & Wellington MH. (1986) On-line Adaptive Control of a Fedbatch Fermentation of Saccharomyces Cerevisiae. J. Biotechnol & Bioengineering. XXVII:631–645.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Rosenbrock, HH., (1960) An Automatic Method for Finding the Greatest or Least Value of a Function. Compu J. 3 (3): 175–184.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Ghose TK, Tyagi RD (1979).Rapid Ethanol Fermentation of Cellulose Hydrolsate. Product and Substrate Inhibition and Optimization of Fermentor Design. Biotechnol Bioeng. 21:1401–1420.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Russell DW (1991) Further Studies in AI Augmented Process Control. Annual Review in Automatic Programming.Vol: 16(1): 75–79.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Nguyen, DH and Widrow, B (1990) Neural Networks for Self-learning Control Systems. IEEE Control Systems Magazine. April: 19–23

    Google Scholar 

  9. Woodcock N et al. (1991) Fuzzy BOXES as an Alternative of Neural Networks for Difficult Control Problems. Applications of Artificial Intelligence in Engineering VI. Rzevski and Adey RA (eds) CML. 903–919.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Wieland AP (1991) Evolving Neural Network Controllers for Unstable Systems. Proc. IJCNN-91 Seattle International Joint Conference on Neural Networks. Vol II: 667–673.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2012 Springer-Verlag London

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Russell, D.W. (2012). Other On/Off Control Case Studies. In: The BOXES Methodology. Springer, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-84996-528-6_9

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-84996-528-6_9

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, London

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-84996-527-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-84996-528-6

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics